Advances in Operating System Integration Improving Productivity in Business Environments

References

[1] Abollado, J.R., Shehab, E. and Bamforth, P., 2017. Challenges and benefits of digital workflow implementation in aerospace manufacturing engineering. Procedia CIRP, 60, pp.80-85.

[2] Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R. and Jardim-Goncalves, R., 2016. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in industry, 79, pp.64-76.

[3] Ahmed, E., Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I.A.T., Khan, I., Ahmed, A.I.A., Imran, M. and Vasilakos, A.V., 2017. The role of big data analytics in Internet of Things. Computer Networks, 129, pp.459-471.

[4] Ali, Z. and Nicola, H., 2018. Accelerating Digital Transformation: Leveraging Enterprise Architecture and AI in Cloud-Driven DevOps and DataOps Frameworks.

[5] Anders, A., 2016. Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), pp.224-261.

[6] Anwar, M.J., Gill, A.Q. and Beydoun, G., 2018, January. A review of information privacy laws and standards for secure digital ecosystems. In ACIS 2018-29th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.

[7] Appio, F.P., Cimino, M.G., Lazzeri, A., Martini, A. and Vaglini, G., 2018. Fostering distributed business logic in Open Collaborative Networks: an integrated approach based on semantic and swarm coordination. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), pp.589-616.

[8] Archer-Brown, C. and Kietzmann, J., 2018. Strategic knowledge management and enterprise social media. Journal of knowledge management, 22(6), pp.1288-1309.

[9] Asch, M., Moore, T., Badia, R., Beck, M., Beckman, P., Bidot, T., Bodin, F., Cappello, F., Choudhary, A., De Supinski, B. and Deelman, E., 2018. Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to convergence-toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 32(4), pp.435-479.

[10] Baktir, A.C., Ozgovde, A. and Ersoy, C., 2017. How can edge computing benefit from software-defined networking: A survey, use cases, and future directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), pp.2359-2391.

[11] Bennett, C.J., 2018. The European General Data Protection Regulation: An instrument for the globalization of privacy standards?. Information Polity, 23(2), pp.239-246.

[12] Biørn-Hansen, A., Grønli, T.M. and Ghinea, G., 2018. A survey and taxonomy of core concepts and research challenges in cross-platform mobile development. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), pp.1-34.

[13] Buhalis, D. and Leung, R., 2018. Smart hospitality Interconnectivity and interoperability towards an ecosystem. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 71, pp.41-50.

[14] Bui, N., Cesana, M., Hosseini, S.A., Liao, Q., Malanchini, I. and Widmer, J., 2017. A survey of anticipatory mobile networking: Context-based classification, prediction methodologies, and optimization techniques. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1790-1821.

[15] Bukhari, T.T., Oladimeji, O.Y.E.T.U.N.J.I., Etim, E.D. and Ajayi, J.O., 2018. A Conceptual Framework for Designing Resilient Multi-Cloud Networks Ensuring Security, Scalability, and Reliability Across Infrastructures. IRE Journals, 1(8), pp.164-173.

[16] Buyya, R., Srirama, S.N., Casale, G., Calheiros, R., Simmhan, Y., Varghese, B., Gelenbe, E., Javadi, B., Vaquero, L.M., Netto, M.A. and Toosi, A.N., 2018. A manifesto for future generation cloud computing: Research directions for the next decade. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 51(5), pp.1-38.

[17] Christou, G., 2016. Cybersecurity in the European Union: Resilience and adaptability in governance policy. Springer.

[18] Colombo, A.W., Karnouskos, S., Kaynak, O., Shi, Y. and Yin, S., 2017. Industrial cyberphysical systems: A backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 11(1), pp.6-16.

[19] Cook, N., 2017. Enterprise 2.0: How social software will change the future of work. Routledge.

[20] Eluwole, O.T., Udoh, N., Ojo, M., Okoro, C. and Akinyoade, A.J., 2018. From 1G to 5G, what next?. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 45(3).

[21] Falotico, E., Vannucci, L., Ambrosano, A., Albanese, U., Ulbrich, S., Vasquez Tieck, J.C., Hinkel, G., Kaiser, J., Peric, I., Denninger, O. and Cauli, N., 2017. Connecting artificial brains to robots in a comprehensive simulation framework: the neurorobotics platform. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 11, p.2.

[22] Feldman, G., Shah, H., Chapman, C. and Amini, A., 2016. Technological, Organisational, and Environmental drivers for enterprise systems upgrade. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), pp.1636-1655.

[23] Haani, V. and Ananya, D., 2018. Shifting Paradigms in Cyber Defense: A 2015 Perspective on Emerging Threats in Cloud Computing and Mobile-First Environments. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 2(6), pp.1711-1731.

[24] Heilig, L., Schwarze, S. and Voß, S., 2017. An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports.

[25] Hwang, J., Bai, K., Tacci, M., Vukovic, M. and Anerousis, N., 2016. Automation and orchestration framework for large-scale enterprise cloud migration. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 60(2-3), pp.1-1.

[26] Javed, F., Afzal, M.K., Sharif, M. and Kim, B.S., 2018. Internet of Things (IoT) operating systems support, networking technologies, applications, and challenges: A comparative review. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), pp.2062-2100.

[27] Kaur, K., Sharma, D.S. and Kahlon, D.K.S., 2017. Interoperability and portability approaches in inter-connected clouds: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(4), pp.1-40.

[28] Kranz, J.J., Hanelt, A. and Kolbe, L.M., 2016. Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change–the case of on‐premise and cloud‐computing software. Information systems journal, 26(5), pp.477-517.

[29] Kurtzer, G.M., Sochat, V. and Bauer, M.W., 2017. Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute. PloS one, 12(5), p.e0177459.

[30] Kusznier, J., Dang, X.T. and Khan, M.A., 2017. Cloud computing: The flexible future. In 5G Radio Access Networks (pp. 85-114). CRC Press.

[31] Laszewski, T., Arora, K., Farr, E. and Zonooz, P., 2018. Cloud Native Architectures: Design high-availability and cost-effective applications for the cloud. Packt Publishing Ltd.

[32] Laszewski, T., Arora, K., Farr, E. and Zonooz, P., 2018. Cloud Native Architectures: Design high-availability and cost-effective applications for the cloud. Packt Publishing Ltd.

[33] Lee, S., Choi, J., Kim, J., Cho, B., Lee, S., Kim, H. and Kim, J., 2017, June. FACT: Functionality-centric access control system for IoT programming frameworks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (pp. 43-54).

[34] Li, C.Z., Zhong, R.Y., Xue, F., Xu, G., Chen, K., Huang, G.G. and Shen, G.Q., 2017. Integrating RFID and BIM technologies for mitigating risks and improving schedule performance of prefabricated house construction. Journal of cleaner production, 165, pp.1048-1062.

[35] Mallachiev, K.M., Pakulin, N.V. and Khoroshilov, A.V., 2016. Design and architecture of real-time operating system. Труды Института системного программирования РАН, 28(2), pp.181-192.

[36] Mishra, M., Sidoti, D., Avvari, G.V., Mannaru, P., Ayala, D.F.M., Pattipati, K.R. and Kleinman, D.L., 2017. A context-driven framework for proactive decision support with applications. IEEE Access, 5, pp.12475-12495.

[37] Montasari, R., Hosseinian-Far, A. and Hill, R., 2018. Policies, innovative self-adaptive techniques and understanding psychology of cybersecurity to counter adversarial attacks in network and cyber environments. Cyber criminology, pp.71-93.

[38] Mulder, D.J., 2018. We Are Just Expected to Know How: Unpacking Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs about Technology Integration. Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2018, p.115.

[39] Navarro, L.F.M., 2017. Investigating the influence of data analytics on content lifecycle management for maximizing resource efficiency and audience impact. Journal of Computational Social Dynamics, 2(2), pp.1-22.

[40] Nazir, O. and Islam, J.U., 2017. Enhancing organizational commitment and employee performance through employee engagement: An empirical check. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(1), pp.98-114.

[41] Oliveira, F., Suneja, S., Nadgowda, S., Nagpurkar, P. and Isci, C., 2017. A cloud-native monitoring and analytics framework. IBM Research Division Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Tech. Rep. RC25669 (WAT1710-006), p.119.

[42] Panetto, H., Zdravkovic, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Romero, D., Cecil, J. and Mezgár, I., 2016. New perspectives for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Computers in industry, 79, pp.47-63.

[43] Pattaranantakul, M., He, R., Song, Q., Zhang, Z. and Meddahi, A., 2018. NFV security survey: From use case driven threat analysis to state-of-the-art countermeasures. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), pp.3330-3368.

[44] Salkin, C., Oner, M., Ustundag, A. and Cevikcan, E., 2017. A conceptual framework for Industry 4.0. In Industry 4.0: managing the digital transformation (pp. 3-23). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[45] Seetharamatantry, H., Murulidhar, N.N. and Chandrasekaran, K., 2017. Implications of Legacy Software System Modernization-A Survey in a Changed Scenario. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(7).

[46] Sharma, P., 2017. Kranti Nation: India and the fourth industrial revolution. Pan Macmillan.

[47] Sharma, S., 2017. The DevOps adoption playbook: a guide to adopting DevOps in a multi-speed IT enterprise. John Wiley & Sons.

[48] Spring, M., Hughes, A., Mason, K. and McCaffrey, P., 2017. Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management, 49, pp.6-19.

[49] Srai, J.S., Kumar, M., Graham, G., Phillips, W., Tooze, J., Ford, S., Beecher, P., Raj, B., Gregory, M., Tiwari, M.K. and Ravi, B., 2016. Distributed manufacturing: scope, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 54(23), pp.6917-6935.

[50] Tagarev, T., Sharkov, G. and Stoianov, N., 2017. Cyber security and resilience of modern societies: A research management architecture. Information & Security, 38, pp.93-108.

[51] Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S. and Sabella, D., 2017. On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1657-1681.

[52] Thabo, N. and Nomvula, K., 2018. Cloud-Native HCM: Redefining Workforce Management for a Distributed Workforce. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 2(4), pp.3112-3124.

[53] Thomas, G.A., Botha, R.A. and Greunen, D.V., 2018. A Virtual-Community-Centric Architecture to Support Coordination in a Large Scale Distributed Environment: A Case Study of the South African Public Sector.

[54] Tsalakanidou, F., 2018. Requirements for data crawling, integration and anonymization.

[55] Turulja, L. and Bajgoric, N., 2018. Information technology, knowledge management and human resource management: Investigating mutual interactions towards better organizational performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(2), pp.255-276.

[56] Weichhart, G., Molina, A., Chen, D., Whitman, L.E. and Vernadat, F., 2016. Challenges and current developments for sensing, smart and sustainable enterprise systems. Computers in Industry, 79, pp.34-46.

[57] Weiß, P., Zolnowski, A., Warg, M. and Schuster, T., 2018. Service dominant architecture: conceptualizing the foundation for execution of digital strategies based on SD logic.

[58] Wry, T. and Zhao, E.Y., 2018. Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organization Science, 29(3), pp.507-528.

[59] Yadav, S., 2017. The hybrid cloud kickstart: Accelerating business transformation with UNIX and Linux. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(6), pp.77-83.

[60] Zoya, F., 2016. From Raw Data to Insight: A Deep Dive into Qlik Sense and QlikView’s Powerful ETL Capabilities.

@article{1712548,
      author = {Okeke Obinna ThankGod, Ugwu-Oju Ukamaka Mary, Nwankwo Constance Obiuto},
      title = {Advances in Operating System Integration Improving Productivity in Business Environments},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {9},
      pages = {432-444},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712548.pdf},
      abstract = {Advances in operating system (OS) integration are redefining productivity dynamics within modern business environments by delivering more seamless, intelligent, and secure digital ecosystems. As organizations increasingly operate across distributed teams, multi-device infrastructures, and cloud-centric workflows, integrated OS architectures play a pivotal role in harmonizing applications, data, and user interactions. These systems transcend traditional device management by enabling unified interfaces, cross-platform synchronization, and automated coordination of tasks and resources significantly reducing operational fragmentation and enhancing workflow continuity. A major advancement lies in the deep integration of cloud services at the OS level, allowing businesses to benefit from real-time file synchronization, persistent user environments, and interoperable application ecosystems. This ensures that employees can transition effortlessly between devices and locations without disruption. Additionally, OS-level API frameworks and standardized communication protocols enable diverse enterprise applications to interact fluidly, eliminating manual data transfers and improving decision accuracy. Artificial intelligence further strengthens OS integration by providing adaptive scheduling, automated maintenance, predictive performance optimization, and enhanced security intelligence. AI-driven system monitoring minimizes downtime, while adaptive resource allocation improves responsiveness and supports high-demand business operations. Enhanced security integration featuring identity management, encryption, and real-time threat analytics creates a more resilient digital environment while reducing administrative complexity. Virtualization and containerization embedded within modern OS platforms also expand operational flexibility, enabling scalable deployment of enterprise applications and supporting rapid development and testing cycles. This accelerates innovation and ensures consistent performance across heterogeneous environments. Collectively, these advances position OS integration as a critical driver of business productivity, enabling organizations to achieve greater agility, operational efficiency, and collaborative capability. As digital ecosystems continue evolving, integrated operating systems will remain central to building resilient, adaptive, and high-performance business infrastructures.},
      keywords = {Operating System Integration, Business Productivity, Cloud Synchronization, Cross-Platform Interoperability, AI-Driven Automation, Virtualization, Enterprise Security, Digital Workflows, System Performance, Collaboration.},
      month = {March},
  }