International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712797

1712797 Vol 9 · Issue 6 Download Paper

Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends

Foluso Israel Taiwo Adelese Solomon Akinseye

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: IoT and Building Technology

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797

Abstract

The building sector stands at a pivotal juncture, grappling with its significant contribution to global energy consumption and carbon emissions while facing escalating pressure to enhance economic viability. Traditional approaches to sustainable design have often prioritized technological efficiency and prescriptive standards, inadvertently creating a "performance gap" where projected savings fail to materialize in operation. This paper posits that the next frontier in sustainable construction lies in the synergistic integration of occupant-centric design principles and data-driven operational sustainability. Through a systematic literature review and conceptual analysis, this article explores the paradigm shift from static, building-centric models to dynamic, human-in-the-loop systems. We investigate how the convergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Building Information Modeling (BIM) facilitates the creation of responsive building ecosystems that learn from and adapt to occupant behavior. The core argument is that by explicitly designing for occupant well-being, comfort, and agency, and by leveraging real-time data for continuous optimization, buildings can achieve a dual objective: superior environmental performance and significant, long-term cost-effectiveness. This paper delineates the key technological pillars—Digital Twins, Federated Learning for privacy-preserving analytics, and AI-driven predictive maintenance—that underpin this transition. It further presents a framework for evaluating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) that captures the hidden financial benefits of enhanced productivity, health, and asset resilience. The findings indicate that the occupant-centric and operational sustainability model is not merely an ethical imperative but a robust strategy for de-risking investments, unlocking new value streams, and ensuring the long-term economic and environmental viability of tomorrow's building stock.

Keywords

Occupant-Centric Design, Operational Sustainability, Cost-Effectiveness, IoT, AI, Digital Twin, Building Performance Gap, Total Cost of Ownership, Healthy Buildings, Predictive Maintenance.

References

[1] United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction.

[2] de Wilde, P. (2018). The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 91, 1-9.

[3] Hong, T., Taylor-Lange, S. C., D'Oca, S., Yan, D., & Corgnati, S. P. (2016). Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 116, 694-702.

[4] World Green Building Council. (2014). Health, Wellbeing & Productivity in Offices: The Next Chapter for Green Building.

[5] ASHRAE. (2019). Standard 90.1-2019, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.

[6] Page, J., Robinson, D., Morel, N., & Scartezzini, J. L. (2008). A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence. Energy and Buildings, 40(2), 83-98.

[7] Brager, G. S., & de Dear, R. J. (1998). Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy and Buildings, 27(1), 83-96.

[8] Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Satish, U., Santanam, S., Vallarino, J., & Spengler, J. D. (2016). Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(6), 805-812.

[9] Scofield, J. H. (2013). Efficacy of LEED-certification in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for large New York City office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 67, 517-525.

[10] ASHRAE. (2020). Standard 55-2020, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy.

[11] Miller, N. G., Pogue, D., Gough, Q. D., & Davis, S. M. (2009). Green buildings and productivity. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 65-89.

[12] Figueiro, M. G., & Rea, M. S. (2016). Office lighting and personal light exposures in two seasons: Impact on sleep and mood. Lighting Research & Technology, 48(3), 352-364.

[13] Satish, U., Mendell, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., & Fisk, W. J. (2012). Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1671-1677.

[14] Zhao, Y., Li, T., Zhang, X., & Zhang, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence-based fault detection and diagnosis for building energy systems: A review. Energy and Buildings, 183, 1-13.

[15] Wang, Z., & Hong, T. (2020). Reinforcement learning for building controls: A comparative study of different algorithms. Applied Energy, 269, 114960.

[16] Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60.

[17] Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Digital Twin: A hybrid approach using the IFC standard and a linked data model. Automation in Construction, 118, 103270.

[18] DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (2015). A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings.

[19] McKinsey & Company. (2016). The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype.

[20] Milton, D. K., Glencross, P. M., & Walters, M. D. (2000). Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. Indoor Air, 10(4), 212-221.

[21] Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50-63.

How to cite this paper

Foluso Israel Taiwo, Adelese Solomon Akinseye "Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 6 2025 Page 2517-2525 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797
Foluso Israel Taiwo, Adelese Solomon Akinseye "Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 6, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797
Foluso Israel Taiwo, Adelese Solomon Akinseye (2025). Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797
Foluso Israel Taiwo, Adelese Solomon Akinseye "Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 6, Dec. 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797
@article{1712797,
      author = {Foluso Israel Taiwo, Adelese Solomon Akinseye},
      title = {Understanding Occupant-Centric and Operational Sustainability for Cost-Effectiveness in Tomorrow's Building Trends},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {2517-2525},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712797.pdf},
      abstract = {The building sector stands at a pivotal juncture, grappling with its significant contribution to global energy consumption and carbon emissions while facing escalating pressure to enhance economic viability. Traditional approaches to sustainable design have often prioritized technological efficiency and prescriptive standards, inadvertently creating a "performance gap" where projected savings fail to materialize in operation. This paper posits that the next frontier in sustainable construction lies in the synergistic integration of occupant-centric design principles and data-driven operational sustainability. Through a systematic literature review and conceptual analysis, this article explores the paradigm shift from static, building-centric models to dynamic, human-in-the-loop systems. We investigate how the convergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Building Information Modeling (BIM) facilitates the creation of responsive building ecosystems that learn from and adapt to occupant behavior. The core argument is that by explicitly designing for occupant well-being, comfort, and agency, and by leveraging real-time data for continuous optimization, buildings can achieve a dual objective: superior environmental performance and significant, long-term cost-effectiveness. This paper delineates the key technological pillars—Digital Twins, Federated Learning for privacy-preserving analytics, and AI-driven predictive maintenance—that underpin this transition. It further presents a framework for evaluating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) that captures the hidden financial benefits of enhanced productivity, health, and asset resilience. The findings indicate that the occupant-centric and operational sustainability model is not merely an ethical imperative but a robust strategy for de-risking investments, unlocking new value streams, and ensuring the long-term economic and environmental viability of tomorrow's building stock.},
      keywords = {Occupant-Centric Design, Operational Sustainability, Cost-Effectiveness, IoT, AI, Digital Twin, Building Performance Gap, Total Cost of Ownership, Healthy Buildings, Predictive Maintenance.},
      month = {December},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712797}
  }