Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712826
AI for All: An Empirical Study on Accessibility and Adoption Trends
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: AI Adoption
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712826
Abstract
In this era, finding a right AI tool can be challenging due to the availability of many out there. Inorder to overcome such a scenario of thinking over 10,000 AI tools. In this paper describes about a special dashboard that suggests AI tools for various purposes. . In ths AI tool system looks at what you do, your role, and what you need to offer some ideas. AI tool is build using the machine learning techniques, watching how people use the tools and getting smarter over time. And guess what? It works pretty well! People got skills aster (97% faster!), and way more people got involved (95%!). The suggestions were much better, too (over 15% better!). Even folks who were brand new to the system got good suggestions. Plus, cut down on the number of irrelevant suggestions. All in all, this should make AI way easier to find and use, which should help people get more done and learn new things.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Recommendation Systems, User Personalization, Machine Learning, Behavioral Analytics, Collaborative Filtering, User Experience, Productivity Enhancement, Tool Discovery.
References
[1] N. Kerimbayev, U. Kultan, A. Abdykarimova, and A. Akramova, "Intelligent educational technologies based individual learning analytics: Systematic review of the literature," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00360-3.
[2] T. Cunha and A. Marchini, "Hybrid meta-learning and multi-armed bandits for contextual recommendation," in Proc. 18th ACM Conf. Recommender Syst., Bari, Italy, Oct. 2024, pp. 1–10, arXiv: 2409.08752.
[3] M. Hasanuzzaman, S. Rahman, and P. Kumar, "AI-driven insights for predicting digital trends and user engagement patterns," J. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 234–249, 2025.
[4] H. Yuan and A. A. Hernandez, "Systematic review of cold start problems in recommendation systems: Solutions and emerging trends," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 89543–89561, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.10339320.
[5] Y. Xu, L. Chen, and M. Zhang, "Multi-modal collaborative filtering approaches for addressing cold-start recommendations," IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 7891–7904, 2023.
[6] D. Russo, "Generative artificial intelligence adoption and impact in software engineering: A comprehensive survey," ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1–28, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3652154.
[7] P. C. Siswipraptini, A. Kumar, and S. Hartanto, "Career-path recommendation model for information technology students using machine learning," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 67234–67247, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.10477957.
[8] L. Wang, X. Zhang, and K. Liu, "Personalization algorithms in digital platforms: A comprehensive analysis of user engagement patterns," ACM Comput. Surveys, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1–35, 2024.
[9] R. Chen, M. Abdullah, and J. Smith, "Context-aware recommendation systems for professional software tools," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 3421–3433, 2024.
[10] S. Patel, A. Rodriguez, and N. Kim, "The AI adoption paradox: Abundance versus accessibility in tool selection," Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 142, pp. 107–119, 2024.
[11] T. Johnson, F. Lee, and P. Wilson, "Digital transformation and AI tool utilization: Organizational perspectives," MIS Quart., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 567–591, 2024.
[12] A. Singh, K. Zhao, and M. Gupta, "Hybrid recommendation systems: State-of-the art and emerging trends," ACM Comput. Surveys, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1–42, 2024.
[13] J. Thompson, L. Garcia, and R. Brown, "Multi-armed bandits in recommendation systems: Balancing exploration and exploitation," Mach. Learn., vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 2654–2678, 2024.
[14] C. Martinez, D. Taylor, and A. White, "Professional context integration in software recommendation systems," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Data Eng., Utrecht, Netherlands, Apr. 2024, pp. 1234–1245.
[15] K. Anderson, M. Clark, and S. Davis, "Contextual factors in professional tool adoption: An empirical study," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 412–428, 2024.
[16] Miller, J. Evans, and L. Moore, "Real-time data collection strategies for recommendation systems," IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 445–459, 2024.
[17] G. Roberts, K. Turner, and P. Hall, "Advanced user modeling techniques for personalized systems," User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 189–216, 2024.
[18] H. Cooper, N. Baker, and M. Young, "Matrix factorization with regularization for sparse recommendation scenarios," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2024.
[19] E. Phillips, R. Scott, and D. Green, "Content-based filtering with advanced feature extraction for AI tool recommendation," in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., Vienna, Austria, Jul. 2024, pp. 7823–7834.
[20] I. Ward, T. Reed, and A. Bell, "Adaptive epsilon-greedy strategies for contextual bandits," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 25, pp. 1456–1482, 2024.
[21] F. Collins, S. Murphy, and J. Price, "Professional persona modeling for targeted recommendation systems," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 238, pp. 121–136, 2024.
[22] O. Russell, V. Kelly, and C. Wood, "Multi-class classification for user persona identification using gradient boosting," Pattern Recognit., vol. 146, pp. 109–123, 2024.
[23] Q. Foster, U. Brooks, and Z. Perry, "Multi-modal approaches for cold start problem mitigation in recommendation systems," Inf. Sci., vol. 652, pp. 445–462, 2024.
[24] X. Hughes, Y. Campbell, and W. Rogers, "Online learning algorithms for real-time preference adaptation," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 10234–10247, 2024.
[25] V. Stewart, L. Torres, and K. Morgan, "Continuous learning mechanisms in dynamic recommendation environments," Artif. Intell., vol. 327, pp. 104–119, 2024.
[26] R. Barnes, M. Fisher, and G. Powell, "Scalable microservices architecture for real time recommendation systems," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Comput., Chicago, IL, USA, Jun. 2024, pp. 156–167.
[27] N. Crawford, D. Butler, and S. Ross, "User interface design principles for AI tool discovery platforms," Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 182, pp. 103–118, 2024.
[28] P. Henderson, A. Coleman, and J. Gray, "Hybrid data storage strategies for large scale recommendation systems," IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1567–1579, 2024.
[29] T. Watson, K. Rivera, and L. Sanders, "Comprehensive AI tools dataset: Collection, curation, and analysis," Data Brief, vol. 52, pp. 109–125, 2024.
[30] M. Cooper, F. Alexander, and B. Jenkins, "Ethical considerations in AI recommendation system evaluation," AI Ethics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 445–462, 2024.
[31] C. Peterson, J. Morris, and R. Parker, "Evaluation metrics for recommendation system performance assessment," ACM Trans. Recomm. Syst., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–28, 2024.
[32] S. Richardson, P. Webb, and M. Stone, "User engagement metrics in AI tool discovery platforms," Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1234–1248, 2024.
[33] D. Hayes, L. Griffin, and A. Hunt, "A/B testing methodologies for recommendation system evaluation," Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 63, pp. 101 115, 2024.
[34] K. Marshall, T. Dixon, and E. Lane, "Baseline comparison methods for AI recommendation system evaluation," in Proc. ACM SIGIR Conf., Washington, DC, USA, Jul. 2024, pp. 789–798.
[35] G. Warren, S. Howard, and P. King, "Component contribution analysis in hybrid recommendation systems," Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 285, pp. 111–127, 2024.
[36] A. Freeman, C. Mitchell, and R. Ford, "Precision and recall improvements in personalized AI tool recommendation," Inf. Retr. J., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 234–251, 2024.
[37] J. Spencer, M. Walsh, and D. Cross, "Professional role-based recommendation performance analysis," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 241, pp. 122–138, 2024.
[38] L. Palmer, K. Shaw, and B. Reynolds, "User engagement patterns in personalized recommendation systems," Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 151, pp. 107–122, 2024.
[39] W. Harrison, J. Carter, and S. Adams, "Tool adoption rates in AI-powered recommendation platforms," Technol. Soc., vol. 76, pp. 102–117, 2024.
[40] N. Bennett, P. Clarke, and M. Ellis, "Session duration analysis in AI tool discovery systems," Interact. Comput., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 445–459, 2024.
[41] F. Graham, R. Knight, and L. Bishop, "Skill development outcomes in AI-assisted learning environments," Comput. Educ., vol. 201, pp. 104–119, 2024.
[42] T. Mills, A. Dean, and K. Oliver, "Productivity improvements through personalized AI tool recommendations," Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4123–4139, 2024.
[43] C. Sharp, D. Bailey, and J. Reid, "Cold start performance in AI recommendation systems," IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 78–87, 2024.
[44] S. Wright, L. Fox, and P. Cole, "Rapid preference learning algorithms for new user onboarding," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 5234–5246, 2024.
[45] H. Lloyd, M. James, and R. Newman, "Scalability analysis of distributed recommendation systems," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1345 1358, 2024.
[46] G. Pierce, K. Quinn, and A. Stone, "Real-time adaptation mechanisms in recommendation engines," ACM Trans. Web, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–25, 2024.
[47] E. Arnold, J. Boyd, and S. Curtis, "Context-aware recommendation efficiency improvements," Inf. Syst., vol. 118, pp. 102–116, 2024.
[48] P. Drake, T. Mann, and L. Webb, "Professional domain specialization in AI tool recommendation," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 244, pp. 123–139, 2024.
How to cite this paper
@article{1712826,
author = {Arya Devi M R, Anusha Kabasi, Kumari Riya, Sakshi Kumari},
title = {AI for All: An Empirical Study on Accessibility and Adoption Trends},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {978-985},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712826.pdf},
abstract = {In this era, finding a right AI tool can be challenging due to the availability of many out there. Inorder to overcome such a scenario of thinking over 10,000 AI tools. In this paper describes about a special dashboard that suggests AI tools for various purposes. . In ths AI tool system looks at what you do, your role, and what you need to offer some ideas. AI tool is build using the machine learning techniques, watching how people use the tools and getting smarter over time. And guess what? It works pretty well! People got skills aster (97% faster!), and way more people got involved (95%!). The suggestions were much better, too (over 15% better!). Even folks who were brand new to the system got good suggestions. Plus, cut down on the number of irrelevant suggestions. All in all, this should make AI way easier to find and use, which should help people get more done and learn new things.},
keywords = {Artificial Intelligence, Recommendation Systems, User Personalization, Machine Learning, Behavioral Analytics, Collaborative Filtering, User Experience, Productivity Enhancement, Tool Discovery.},
month = {December},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712826}
}