Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713071
Optimizing and Predicting the Performance of Lateritic Concrete Enhanced with PCE-Superplasticizers Using Response Surface Methodology
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Concrete, Lateritic Concrete, Optimization, RSM
Abstract
This research employed response surface methodology (RSM) to optimise lateritic concrete with the inclusion of HYDROPLAST 240GP, a PCE superplasticizer, to improve workability and compressive strength while reducing the deleterious impacts of the clay content in laterite. Experimental mixtures with different laterite replacement levels (7.5?30%) of sand fine aggregates and superplasticizer dosages (0.8?1.5%) were assessed were used. compressive strength tests at 7 and 28 days, and microstructural analyses employing SEM, EDX, and XRD techniques were done. The combination of 7.5% laterite replacement and 1.15% HYDROPLAST 240GP resulted in the highest 28-day compressive strength of 22.6 N/mm?, in contrast to 22.09 N/mm? observed in the control sample. SEM, EDX, and XRD analyses showed denser microstructure characterised by reduced porosity, increased calcium silicate hydrate formation, improved hydration products, and a uniform distribution of elements in the optimised mix. The RSM model showed that enhancing laterite replacement at 13?15% with a superplasticizer dosage of approximately 1.15% improved strength and gave good workability. The findings indicate that HYDROPLAST 240GP and RSM effectively optimised lateritic concrete mix designs, providing a cost-efficient and sustainable alternative appropriate for laterite-rich areas.
Keywords
Lateritic concrete, Response Surface Methodology, HYDROPLAST 240GP, Compressive strength
References
[1] Adewumi, A. A., Oke, O. L., & Akinyemi, B. A. (2022). Evaluation of workability and strength characteristics of laterized concrete using superplasticizers. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development, 19(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v19i2.4
[2] Adewuyi, J. K., & Adegoke, I. O. (2008). Exploratory study of periwinkle shells as coarse aggregates in concrete works. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(6), 1–5.
[3] Amadi, B., Akeke, S. E., & Obasi, A. E. (2017). Influence of laterite as fine aggregate on the particle size distribution in concrete mixes. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(3), 801–806. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i3.30
[4] Amadi, D. O., & Eberemu, A. O. (2012). Effect of quarry dust addition on the performance of laterite-cement mixes as road base materials. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30(5), 1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9544-5
[5] ASTM International. (2015). ASTM C143/C143M-15: Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM International.
[6] ASTM International. (2015). ASTM C128-15: Standard test method for density, relative density (specific gravity), and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM International.
[7] ASTM International. (2015). ASTM C127-15: Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM International.
[8] ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D2487-17: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International.
[9] ASTM International. (2018). ASTM C114-18: Standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. ASTM International.
[10] ASTM International. (2019). ASTM C136/C136M-19: Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM International.
[11] ASTM International. (2019). ASTM C192/C192M-19: Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM International.
[12] ASTM International. (2019). ASTM C494/C494M-19: Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM International.
[13] ASTM International. (2021). ASTM C39/C39M-21: Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International.
[14] Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(1), 1–45.
[15] Das, B. M. (2010). Principles of geotechnical engineering (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[16] Khayat, K. H. (1999). Workability, testing, and performance of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 96(3), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.14359/418
[17] Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2006). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[18] Ndububa, E. E., & Mukaddas, A. M. (2016). Mud house failures and mitigation options in Bauchi, North East Nigeria. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 26–30.
[19] Ndububa, E. E., Nnebe, F. O., & Onche, E. (2025). Geotechnical profiling and experimental characterization of lateritic soils in Abuja area councils: A geographic analysis. UNIABUJA Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v1i1.11
[20] Ndububa, E. E., & Malgwi, Y. I. (2016). Strength improvement of mud houses through stabilization of the lateritic materials. International Journal of Engineering Science, 5(9), 56–60. https://www.theijes.com/papers/v5-i9/H0509056060.pdf
[21] Neville, A. M. (1995). Properties of concrete (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
[22] Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
[23] Ogundiran, J. S., & Akinmoladun, A. O. (2013). Optimization of concrete mix design using response surface methodology. Construction and Building Materials, 41, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.086
[24] Olawuyi, R. N., & Olusola, K. O. (2010). Compressive strength of laterized concrete using different mixes. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2010.485294
[25] Plank, J., Sakai, E., Miao, C. W., Yu, C., & Hong, J. X. (2015). Chemical admixtures—Chemistry, applications and their impact on concrete microstructure and durability. Cement and Concrete Research, 78, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.016
[26] Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Concrete admixtures handbook: Properties, science, and technology (2nd ed.). Noyes Publications.
[27] Rao, S. M., & Reddy, B. V. V. (2002). Characterization of laterite for building applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(3), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(230)
[28] Saichand, G. (2019). Study of concrete by replacement of lateritic soil as a partial replacement in the fine aggregate. International Journal of Recent Advances in Science and Engineering Technology, 7(4), 4277–4282. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2019.4277
[29] Siddique, R. (2011). Influence of superplasticizers on the properties of concrete. Journal of Building Materials, 12(1), 24–32.
[30] Soutsos, M., Khayat, K. H., & Sivalingam, P. E. (2011). Effect of different types of superplasticizers on the properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 315–324.
[31] Poon, C. S., & Lam, L. (2009). Effect of superplasticizer on the workability and durability of concrete. Journal of Materials Science, 44(5), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3202-0
How to cite this paper
@article{1713071,
author = {Victor Omosekhoa Ezekiel, Emmanuel Eberechukwu Ndububa, Olumide W. Oseni, Obayehagweme Ezekiel},
title = {Optimizing and Predicting the Performance of Lateritic Concrete Enhanced with PCE-Superplasticizers Using Response Surface Methodology},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {1873-1885},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713071.pdf},
abstract = {This research employed response surface methodology (RSM) to optimise lateritic concrete with the inclusion of HYDROPLAST 240GP, a PCE superplasticizer, to improve workability and compressive strength while reducing the deleterious impacts of the clay content in laterite. Experimental mixtures with different laterite replacement levels (7.5?30%) of sand fine aggregates and superplasticizer dosages (0.8?1.5%) were assessed were used. compressive strength tests at 7 and 28 days, and microstructural analyses employing SEM, EDX, and XRD techniques were done. The combination of 7.5% laterite replacement and 1.15% HYDROPLAST 240GP resulted in the highest 28-day compressive strength of 22.6 N/mm?, in contrast to 22.09 N/mm? observed in the control sample. SEM, EDX, and XRD analyses showed denser microstructure characterised by reduced porosity, increased calcium silicate hydrate formation, improved hydration products, and a uniform distribution of elements in the optimised mix. The RSM model showed that enhancing laterite replacement at 13?15% with a superplasticizer dosage of approximately 1.15% improved strength and gave good workability. The findings indicate that HYDROPLAST 240GP and RSM effectively optimised lateritic concrete mix designs, providing a cost-efficient and sustainable alternative appropriate for laterite-rich areas.},
keywords = {Lateritic concrete, Response Surface Methodology, HYDROPLAST 240GP, Compressive strength},
month = {December},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1713071}
}