Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713253
Evaluating Material Recovery Systems and Barriers to Zero-Waste Adoption in Construction Sites
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Construction Engineering and Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713253
Abstract
The construction industry is a major contributor to solid waste generation, making effective Material Recovery Systems (MRS) essential for advancing zero-waste construction practices. This study evaluated the effectiveness of material recovery systems and examined the barriers to zero-waste adoption in a private construction company in Cabanatuan City, Philippines. A quantitative descriptive?correlational research design was employed, involving 30 purposively selected employees who responded to a validated five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the level of MRS effectiveness and perceived barriers, while Pearson?s product?moment correlation analysis was conducted at a 0.05 level of significance. Results revealed a high level of Material Recovery System effectiveness (M = 3.64, SD = 0.74) and a moderate level of barriers to zero-waste adoption (M = 3.00, SD = 0.81). Correlation analysis showed a significant positive relationship between MRS effectiveness and zero-waste adoption (r = 0.58, p < .01), and a significant negative relationship between barriers and zero-waste adoption (r = ?0.46, p < .05). The findings indicate that strengthening material recovery practices can reduce implementation barriers and enhance zero-waste adoption in construction projects, highlighting the importance of management support, employee training, and systematic recovery processes.
Keywords
Material Recovery Systems, Zero-Waste Adoption, Construction Waste Management, Sustainability
References
[1] Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O. (2017). Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 118, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.007 [Crossref]
[2] Ajayi, S. O., & Oyedele, L. O. (2018). Waste-efficient materials procurement for construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 127–141.
[3] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Crossref]
[4] Baldwin, A., Poon, C. S., Shen, L. Y., Austin, S. A., & Wong, I. (2009). Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings. Waste Management, 29(1), 226–232.
[5] Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. H. (2006). A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48(1), 86–98.
[6] Bhandari, K., Tiwari, A., & Dhakal, S. (2025). Barriers to circular economy implementation in the construction sector of developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 138212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.138212 [Crossref]
[7] Chen, Z. (2024). Sustainable construction waste management: Challenges and opportunities for developing economies. Sustainability, 16(3), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031024 [Crossref]
[8] Chen, Z., Li, H., Wong, J. K. W., & Wang, H. (2024). Evaluating construction waste recovery and zero-waste pathways using circular economy principles. Waste Management, 173, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.01.012 [Crossref]
[9] De Burca, S. (2023). Zero-waste strategies in construction project management. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(6), 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2035417 [Crossref]
[10] Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2001). Republic Act No. 9003: Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000.
[11] Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.
[12] Government of the Philippines. (2012). Republic Act No. 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012.
[13] Hussain, A., Ali, M., & Khan, R. (2022). Construction and demolition waste management: Global trends and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 314, 115038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115038 [Crossref]
[14] Kapica, R., Targowski, P., & Kulowski, A. (2024). Organizational and regulatory barriers to sustainable construction waste management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104873 [Crossref]
[15] Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery (4th ed.). Wiley.
[16] Lara, J., Gómez, R., & Villanueva, M. (2025). Advancing zero-waste construction through circular economy adoption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 203, 107012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107012 [Crossref]
[17] Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011). A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Management, 31(6), 1252–1260.
[18] Molla, A., Rahman, M., & Islam, S. (2025). Construction waste disposal practices and environmental impacts in Southeast Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(4), 5561–5574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31877-5 [Crossref]
[19] One Planet Network. (n.d.). Construction and buildings programme: Sustainable waste management. United Nations Environment Programme.
[20] Poon, C. S. (2017). Reducing construction waste through reuse and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, 1–5.
[21] Roper, K. O. (2024). Integrating zero-waste principles into construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(2), 04023121. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.0002045 [Crossref]
[22] United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Global status report for buildings and construction.
[23] Wadehra, S. (2024). Policy enforcement challenges in construction waste management. International Journal of Environmental Policy and Decision Making, 9(1), 44–59.
[24] Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Shen, L., & Skitmore, M. (2014). A prototype system dynamics model for assessing the sustainability of construction waste management. Waste Management, 34(12), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.015 [Crossref]
How to cite this paper
@article{1713253,
author = {Gianne Ver Jacinto, Shyrll Liwag, Helen Grace Odulio, Gie Ann Rose Ortilla, Marvin O. Mallari},
title = {Evaluating Material Recovery Systems and Barriers to Zero-Waste Adoption in Construction Sites},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {7},
pages = {23-27},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713253.pdf},
abstract = {The construction industry is a major contributor to solid waste generation, making effective Material Recovery Systems (MRS) essential for advancing zero-waste construction practices. This study evaluated the effectiveness of material recovery systems and examined the barriers to zero-waste adoption in a private construction company in Cabanatuan City, Philippines. A quantitative descriptive?correlational research design was employed, involving 30 purposively selected employees who responded to a validated five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the level of MRS effectiveness and perceived barriers, while Pearson?s product?moment correlation analysis was conducted at a 0.05 level of significance. Results revealed a high level of Material Recovery System effectiveness (M = 3.64, SD = 0.74) and a moderate level of barriers to zero-waste adoption (M = 3.00, SD = 0.81). Correlation analysis showed a significant positive relationship between MRS effectiveness and zero-waste adoption (r = 0.58, p < .01), and a significant negative relationship between barriers and zero-waste adoption (r = ?0.46, p < .05). The findings indicate that strengthening material recovery practices can reduce implementation barriers and enhance zero-waste adoption in construction projects, highlighting the importance of management support, employee training, and systematic recovery processes.},
keywords = {Material Recovery Systems, Zero-Waste Adoption, Construction Waste Management, Sustainability},
month = {January},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713253}
}