International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713331

1713331 Vol 9 · Issue 7 Download Paper

Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression

Adehi Unekwu Mary Nweze Nwaze Obini Umoh Offiong Effiong Maijama?a Bilkisu

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Meta-analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Reproductive and familial factors are known to influence breast cancer risk, but their effects vary across studies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of selected covariates on breast cancer risk using a Knapp?Hartung adjusted random-effects meta-regression. Methods: A random-effects meta-regression analysis was conducted using data from 60 samples. The model assessed the associations between breast cancer risk and age at menarche, history of breastfeeding, age at menopause, and family history of cancer. The Knapp?Hartung adjustment was applied to account for uncertainty in between-study variance. All statistical analyses were performed using R software. Results: Ever breastfed was significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (coefficient = ?0.4135, p = 0.001), Menopause (coefficient = 0.1082, p = 0.024) and family history of cancer (coefficient = 0.2435, p = 0.015) were significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk. Menarche demonstrated a positive but borderline significant association with breast cancer risk (coefficient = 0.1116, p = 0.063). Conclusion: Breastfeeding appears to confer a protective effect against breast cancer, whereas menopause and family history of cancer are associated with elevated risk. These findings emphasize the importance of reproductive and familial factors in breast cancer risk evaluation and prevention strategies.

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Meta-Regression, Knapp?Hartung Adjustment, Ever Breastfed Menopause, Menarche, Family History of Breast Cancer

References

[1] Cancer Research UK. (2020). Breast cancer risk factors. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/risk-factors

[2] Colditz, G. A., Bohlke, K., & Berkey, C. S. (2006). Breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(3), 229–241.

[3] Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. (2012). Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118,964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. The Lancet Oncology, 13(11), 1141–1151. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23084519/

[4] European Journal of Medical Research. (2022). Breast cancer risk factors in Iranian women: Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://eurjmedres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40001-022-00952-0

[5] Goswami, S., et al. (2023). Association of reproductive risk factors and breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-023-11049-0

[6] Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2004). Controlling heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 23(24), 3663–3679.

[7] Indian Journal of Cancer. (2023). Association of hormonal and reproductive risk factors. https://journals.lww.com/indianjcancer/fulltext/2023/60010/association_of_hormonal_and_reproductive_risk.2.aspx

[8] IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Borm, G. F., & Goeman, J. J. (2014). The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis: A tutorial. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

[9] Jackson, D., Law, M., & Rücker, G. (2017). The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns? Statistics in Medicine, 36(30), 4690–4701. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7411

[10] Kelly, K. M., Dean, J., Comulada, S. W., & Lee, S.-J. (2010). Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Breast, 20(3), 734–742.

[11] Key, T. J., Verkasalo, P. K., & Banks, E. (2001). Epidemiology of breast cancer. The Lancet Oncology, 2(3), 133–140.

[12] Knapp, G., & Hartung, J. (2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22(17), 2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1482

[13] Li, L., Zhang, Q., Zhu, L., Zeng, G., Huang, H., Zhuge, J., et al. (2022, December 22). Screen time and depression risk: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.

[14] Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.

[15] Lyons, L. (2003). Meta-analysis: Across research domains.

[16] Manson, J. E., Rowan, C. T., Stefanick, M. L., Aragaki, A. K., Rossouw, J. E., Ross, P. L., et al. (2013). Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA.

[17] Marcucci, R. (1980). A meta-analysis of research of teaching mathematical problem solving (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(06A).

[18] NCBI Bookshelf. (2012). Breast cancer – Risk factors. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546553/

[19] PubMed. (2019). Reproductive and lifestyle factors related to breast cancer risk: Evidence from population studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31069183/

[20] Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J. D., França, G. V. A., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., et al. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490.

[21] Wikipedia. (2025). Meta-regression. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-regression

How to cite this paper

Adehi Unekwu Mary, Nweze Nwaze Obini, Umoh Offiong Effiong, Maijama?a Bilkisu "Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 7 2026 Page 246-253 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331
Adehi Unekwu Mary, Nweze Nwaze Obini, Umoh Offiong Effiong, Maijama?a Bilkisu "Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331
Adehi Unekwu Mary, Nweze Nwaze Obini, Umoh Offiong Effiong, Maijama?a Bilkisu (2026). Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331
Adehi Unekwu Mary, Nweze Nwaze Obini, Umoh Offiong Effiong, Maijama?a Bilkisu "Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331
@article{1713331,
      author = {Adehi Unekwu Mary, Nweze Nwaze Obini, Umoh Offiong Effiong, Maijama?a Bilkisu},
      title = {Investigating The Effects of The Model Covariates on Breast Cancer Risk Using the Knapp-Hartung Adjusted Random-Effects Meta-Regression},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {246-253},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713331.pdf},
      abstract = {Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Reproductive and familial factors are known to influence breast cancer risk, but their effects vary across studies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of selected covariates on breast cancer risk using a Knapp?Hartung adjusted random-effects meta-regression.
Methods: A random-effects meta-regression analysis was conducted using data from 60 samples. The model assessed the associations between breast cancer risk and age at menarche, history of breastfeeding, age at menopause, and family history of cancer. The Knapp?Hartung adjustment was applied to account for uncertainty in between-study variance. All statistical analyses were performed using R software.
Results: Ever breastfed was significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (coefficient = ?0.4135, p = 0.001), Menopause (coefficient = 0.1082, p = 0.024) and family history of cancer (coefficient = 0.2435, p = 0.015) were significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk. Menarche demonstrated a positive but borderline significant association with breast cancer risk (coefficient = 0.1116, p = 0.063).
Conclusion: Breastfeeding appears to confer a protective effect against breast cancer, whereas menopause and family history of cancer are associated with elevated risk. These findings emphasize the importance of reproductive and familial factors in breast cancer risk evaluation and prevention strategies.
},
      keywords = {Breast Cancer, Meta-Regression, Knapp?Hartung Adjustment, Ever Breastfed Menopause, Menarche, Family History of Breast Cancer},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713331}
  }