International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713391

1713391 Vol 9 · Issue 7 Download Paper

Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions

Leena Albalooshi Bedoor Alomran Anwar Almofleh Mohamed Alseddiqi Osama Najam

Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences  ·  Area of research: Biological Affects

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391

Abstract

Purpose: This review aims to examine the biological effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exposure in healthcare professionals working with high-field MRI systems (1.5 Tesla and above). By synthesizing current evidence, it seeks to inform future safety guidelines and highlight potential risks associated with cumulative, long-term exposure among MRI technicians and radiologists. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on studies published from 2000 to 2024. Databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) were queried using key terms such as ?MRI exposure,? ?occupational health,? and ?high-field MRI.? Studies were evaluated based on methodological rigor, relevance to occupational settings, and reported biological effects. The search aimed to identify both short-term and long-term physiological impacts of repeated MRI exposure. Results: Although short-term MRI exposure is generally safe, healthcare workers consistently operating high-field MRI systems may experience transient sensory disturbances (e.g., vertigo, nausea) and possible long-term physiological effects. Findings suggest an elevated concern for cumulative exposure, yet conclusive evidence on the magnitude and nature of these risks remains limited due to variability in study designs and outcomes. Conclusion: While MRI technology plays a pivotal role in diagnostic medicine, ongoing research is needed to clarify the occupational hazards for healthcare professionals exposed to high-field environments. Improved monitoring, standardized safety protocols, and comprehensive longitudinal studies are recommended to ensure the continued safe use of MRI in clinical settings

Keywords

Electromagnetic Fields; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRI Safety

References

[1] Al Khudairi, O. A., Alasiri, R. S. A., Al Saiary, S. O. S., Al-Shalail, G. A., Hadi, S. M. A., Alyami, S. H. H., & Al Shreeh, N. H. (2023). Radiation In Diagnostic Imaging: An In-Depth Examination. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 10(5), 118-124.

[2] Spagnuolo, G., & Soltani, P. (2024). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in digital dentistry: The start of a new era. Prosthesis, 6(4), 798-802.

[3] Ibrayeva, L., Grebeneva, O., Shadetova, A., Rybalkina, D., Minbayeva, L., Bacheva, I., & Alekseyev, A. (2021). Effect of non-ionizing radiation on the health of medical staff of magnetic resonance imaging rooms. Journal of clinical medicine of Kazakhstan, 18(4), 16-22.

[4] Blamire, A. M. (2008). The technology of MRI—the next 10 years? The British journal of radiology, 81(968), 601-617.

[5] Aljahdali, S., Azim, G., Zabani, W., Bafaraj, S., Alyami, J., & Abduljabbar, A. (2024). Effectiveness of radiology modalities in diagnosing and characterizing brain disorders. Neurosciences Journal, 29(1), 37-43.

[6] Hussain, S., Mubeen, I., Ullah, N., Shah, S. S. U. D., Khan, B. A., Zahoor, M., ... & Sultan, M. A. (2022). Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical field: a review. BioMed research international, 2022(1), 5164970.

[7] Ashby, K., Adams, B. N., & Shetty, M. (2020). Appropriate magnetic resonance imaging ordering.

[8] Ghadimi, M., & Sapra, A. (2019). Magnetic resonance imaging contraindications.

[9] Hartwig, V., Giovannetti, G., Vanello, N., Lombardi, M., Landini, L., & Simi, S. (2009). Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 6(6), 1778-1798.

[10] Mittendorff, L., Young, A., & Sim, J. (2022). A narrative review of current and emerging MRI safety issues: What every MRI technologist (radiographer) needs to know. Journal of medical radiation sciences, 69(2), 250-260.

[11] Formica, D., & Silvestri, S. (2004). Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomedical engineering online, 3, 1-12.

[12] Schenck, J. F. (2005). Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 87(2-3), 185-204.

[13] Kangarlu, A., & Robitaille, P. M. L. (2000). Biological effects and health implications in magnetic resonance imaging. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance: An Educational Journal, 12(5), 321-359.

[14] Sammet, S. (2016). Magnetic resonance safety. Abdominal radiology, 41, 444-451.

[15] Glans, A., Wilén, J., Lindgren, L., Björkman- Burtscher, I. M., & Hansson, B. (2022). Health effects related to exposure of static magnetic fields and acoustic noise—comparison between MR and CT radiographers. European Radiology, 32(11), 7896-7909.

[16] Grant, A., Metzger, G. J., Van de Moortele, P. F., Adriany, G., Olman, C., Zhang, L., ... & Uğurbil, K. (2020). 10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function. Magnetic resonance imaging, 73, 163-176.

[17] Cavin, I. D., Glover, P. M., Bowtell, R. W., & Gowland, P. A. (2007). Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 26(5), 1357- 1361.

[18] Heinrich, A., Szostek, A., Meyer, P., Reinhard, I., Gilles, M., Paslakis, G., ... & Nees, F. (2014). Women are more strongly affected by dizziness in static magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Neuroreport, 25(14), 1081- 1084.

[19] Saito, N., Hirano, T., & Kuwatsuru, R. (2024). Risk factors for imaging abnormalities in patients with dizziness complaints: an algorithm for ordering brain imaging. Clinical Radiology.

[20] Kabra, R., Robbie, H., & Connor, S. E. J. (2015). Diagnostic yield and impact of MRI for acute ischaemic stroke in patients presenting with dizziness and vertigo. Clinical Radiology, 70(7), 736-742.

[21] Saber Tehrani, A. S., Kattah, J. C., Mantokoudis, G., Pula, J. H., Nair, D., Blitz, A., ... & Newman-Toker, D. E. (2014). Small strokes causing severe vertigo: frequency of false-negative MRIs and nonlacunar mechanisms. Neurology, 83(2), 169-173.

[22] Zanotti, G., Ligabue, G., & Gobba, F. (2015). Subjective symptoms and their evolution in a small group of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) operators recently engaged. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 34(3), 262-264.

[23] Touitou, Y., Djeridane, Y., Lambrozo, J., Camus, F., & Selmaoui, B. (2013). Long-term (up to 20 years) effects of 50-Hz magnetic field exposure on immune system and hematological parameters in healthy men. Clinical biochemistry, 46(1-2), 59-63.

[24] Zanotti, G., Ligabue, G., & Gobba, F. (2015). Subjective symptoms and their evolution in a small group of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) operators recently engaged. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 34(3), 262-264.

[25] Ladd, M. E., Bachert, P., Meyerspeer, M., Moser, E., Nagel, A. M., Norris, D. G., ... & Zaiss, M. (2018). Pros and cons of ultra-high- field MRI/MRS for human application. Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 109, 1-50.

[26] Schenck, J. F. (2000). Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 12(1), 2-19.

[27] Expert Panel on MR Safety: Kanal, E., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., Borgstede, J. P., Bradley Jr, W. G., ... & Hernandez, D. (2013). ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 37(3), 501-530.

[28] Formica, D., & Silvestri, S. (2004). Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomedical engineering online, 3, 1-12.

[29] Huss, A., Özdemir, E., Schaap, K., & Kromhout, H. (2021). Occupational exposure to MRI-related magnetic stray fields and sleep quality among MRI–Technicians-A cross- sectional study in the Netherlands. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 231, 113636.

[30] Feychting, M. (2005). Health effects of static magnetic fields—a review of the epidemiological evidence. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 87(2-3), 241- 246.

[31] Touitou, Y., Djeridane, Y., Lambrozo, J., Camus, F., & Selmaoui, B. (2013). Long-term (up to 20 years) effects of 50-Hz magnetic field exposure on immune system and hematological parameters in healthy men. Clinical biochemistry, 46(1-2), 59-63.

[32] National Research Council (US) Committee on the Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Biologic Systems. (1997). Possible health effects of exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields (Executive summary). National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2327 27/

[33] Scientific Committee on Emerging Newly Identified Health Risks. (2015). Opinion on potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 36(6), 480-484.

[34] Moon, J. H. (2020). Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children. Clinical and experimental pediatrics, 63(11), 422.

[35] Schüz, J. (2011). Exposure to extremely low- frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer: update of the epidemiological evidence. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 107(3), 339-342.

[36] Schüz, J., & Erdmann, F. (2016). Environmental exposure and risk of childhood leukemia: an overview. Archives of medical research, 47(8), 607-614.

[37] London, S. J., Thomas, D. C., Bowman, J. D., Sobel, E., Cheng, T. C., & Peters, J. M. (1991). Exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia. American journal of epidemiology, 134(9), 923-937.

[38] Fatahi, M., Reddig, A., Friebe, B., Reinhold, D., & Speck, O. (2017). MRI and genetic damage: an update. Current Radiology Reports, 5, 1-7.

[39] Ghahremani, S., Shiroudbakhshi, K., Salimi Kordasiabi, A. H., FiroozBakht, M., Hosseinzadegan, M., Ashrafinia, F., & Rahafard, S. (2020). Exposure to magnetic fields and childhood leukemia: An overview of meta-analysis. International Journal of Pediatrics, 8(5), 11361-11365.

How to cite this paper

Leena Albalooshi, Bedoor Alomran, Anwar Almofleh, Mohamed Alseddiqi, Osama Najam "Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 7 2026 Page 458-470 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391
Leena Albalooshi, Bedoor Alomran, Anwar Almofleh, Mohamed Alseddiqi, Osama Najam "Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391
Leena Albalooshi, Bedoor Alomran, Anwar Almofleh, Mohamed Alseddiqi, Osama Najam (2026). Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391
Leena Albalooshi, Bedoor Alomran, Anwar Almofleh, Mohamed Alseddiqi, Osama Najam "Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391
@article{1713391,
      author = {Leena Albalooshi, Bedoor Alomran, Anwar Almofleh, Mohamed Alseddiqi, Osama Najam},
      title = {Effects of Exposure to Magnetic Fields in MRI: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {458-470},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713391.pdf},
      abstract = {Purpose: This review aims to examine the biological effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exposure in healthcare professionals working with high-field MRI systems (1.5 Tesla and above). By synthesizing current evidence, it seeks to inform future safety guidelines and highlight potential risks associated with cumulative, long-term exposure among MRI technicians and radiologists.
Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on studies published from 2000 to 2024. Databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) were queried using key terms such as ?MRI exposure,? ?occupational health,? and ?high-field MRI.? Studies were evaluated based on methodological rigor, relevance to occupational settings, and reported biological effects. The search aimed to identify both short-term and long-term physiological impacts of repeated MRI exposure.
Results: Although short-term MRI exposure is generally safe, healthcare workers consistently operating high-field MRI systems may experience transient sensory disturbances (e.g., vertigo, nausea) and possible long-term physiological effects. Findings suggest an elevated concern for cumulative exposure, yet conclusive evidence on the magnitude and nature of these risks remains limited due to variability in study designs and outcomes.
Conclusion: While MRI technology plays a pivotal role in diagnostic medicine, ongoing research is needed to clarify the occupational hazards for healthcare professionals exposed to high-field environments. Improved monitoring, standardized safety protocols, and comprehensive longitudinal studies are recommended to ensure the continued safe use of MRI in clinical settings
},
      keywords = {Electromagnetic Fields; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRI Safety},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713391}
  }