Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713399
The Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity: Path or Barrier to Sustainable Peace in the DRC-Rwanda Conflict
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Inter-State Conflict
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713399
Abstract
The Washington Accords, initially signed on June 27, 2025, between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, mark a significant United States-brokered effort to address one of Africa?s most protracted and deadliest conflicts in the Great Lakes region. The subsequent December 2025 incorporation of the Regional Economic Integration Framework (REIF) expanded the accords? economic scope but did not resolve the structural flaws, as evidenced by continued M23 offensives and implementation failures. This article examines the Washington Accords to assess its prospect for delivering peace in the conflict-affected areas. The elite pact theory and a qualitative analytical approach are employed, drawing on official documents, expert commentary, reports to provide theoretical and interpretive depth, particularly in relation to the strategic security and mineral interests of the externally brokered parties. The accord provided for troop withdrawal, joint security coordination, refugee repatriation, and economic integration, but its structure excludes major non-state armed actors, contains limited enforcement and verification mechanisms, and prioritizes external economic interests over local accountability and inclusion. The article establishes that if these shortcomings are not addressed, the accord risks long-term failure and may follow the same pattern as previous peace agreements in the region. It therefore recommends dialogue with armed groups and the local communities, robust and independent monitoring mechanisms, and governance reform that addresses the underlying political and economic drivers of the conflict as necessary conditions for transforming the Accord into a framework for sustained peace.
Keywords
Washington Accords, DRC-Rwanda conflict, Elite Pact, M23, peace agreement, Great Lakes, conflict resolution, REIF.
References
[1] African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (2013, July 24). Resolution on the Human Rights Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo - ACHPR/Res.241 (EXT.OS/XIV) 2013. https://achpr.au.int/en/node/706[](https://achpr.au.int/en/node/706)
[2] African Union. (2025, June 28). The Chairperson of the African Union Commission welcomes the signing of the peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda [Press release]. https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20250628/auc-chairperson-welcomes-signing-peace-agreement-between-drc-and-rwanda
[3] Agwanda, B., & Nyadera, I. N. (2025, January 6). Conflict and conflict resolution in the DRC: Why local approaches matter. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. https://www.fletcherforum.org/home/2025/1/6/conflict-and-conflict-resolution-in-the-drc-why-local-approaches-matter
[4] Al Jazeera. (2025, July 4). Rwanda president unsure if DRC peace deal will hold, warns against ‘tricks’. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/4/rwanda-president-unsure-if-drc-peace-deal-will-hold-warns-against-tricks
[5] Al Jazeera. (2025, June 19). DR Congo and Rwanda to sign peace agreement on June 27. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/19/dr-congo-and-rwanda-sign-draft-peace-agreement
[6] Al-Khulaifi, S. (2025, May 23). DRC’s conflict demands a new peace model rooted in inclusion and reform. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2025/5/23/drcs-conflict-demands-a-new-peace-model-rooted-in-inclusion-and-reform
[7] Amnesty International. (2024, October 29). Why is the Democratic Republic of Congo wracked by conflict? https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2024/10/why-is-the-democratic-republic-of-congo-wracked-by-conflict/
[8] Anadolu Agency. (2025, July 28). DR Congo’s president demands justice, accountability for crimes committed in country’s east. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/dr-congo-s-president-demands-justice-accountability-for-crimes-committed-in-country-s-east/3617719
[9] Bwija, K. (2026, January 3). Violent clashes between DRC forces, M23 group near key city. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/violent-clashes-between-drc-forces-m23-group-near-key-city/article70468489.ece
[10] Cascais, A. (2025, January 29). DR Congo: 'Diplomacy has failed'. DW. https://www.dw.com/en/diplomacy-failure-dr-congo-crisis/a-71449574
[11] Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, June 9). Violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Global Conflict Tracker. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violence-democratic-republic-congo
[12] European External Action Service. (2025, June 29). International Contact Group for the Great Lakes (ICG) on the Peace Agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda signed in Washington on 27 June 2025. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/international-contact-group-great-lakes-icg-peace-agreement-between-democratic-republic-congo-and_en
[13] Fu, C. (2025, December 12). Remarks on MONUSCO by Ambassador Fu Cong at the UN Security Council briefing. Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN. https://un.china-mission.gov.cn/eng/hyyfy/202512/t20251213_11772117.htm
[14] Human Rights Watch. (2002). The war within the war: Sexual violence against women and girls in Eastern Congo. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/drc/Congo0602-03.htm
[15] Nyaga, E. (2017). State crisis and the emergence of refugee warrior communities: A case of the Kivu region, Eastern Congo [Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi]. eRepository@UoN. https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/99537
[16] O'Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies (Vol. 4). Johns Hopkins University Press.
[17] Okoli, C., & Igbokwe, E. M. (2025). The African Union’s fading grip: Military coups and the erosion of peace and security. IRE Journals, 7(9), 108–116. https://www.irejournals.com/paper-details/1709184
[18] Plaut, M. (2025, June 28). Will Trump’s peace deal between Rwanda and Congo work? Almost certainly not. Martin Plaut. https://martinplaut.com/2025/06/28/will-trumps-peace-deal-between-rwanda-and-congo-work-almost-certainly-not/
[19] The Guardian. (2025, July 2). DRC, Rwanda sign historic peace deal marking regional hope. https://www.ippmedia.com/en/features/drc-rwanda-sign-historic-peace-deal-marking-regional-hope
[20] United Nations News. (2025, February 7). DR Congo: UN chief calls for urgent talks to end escalating violence in east. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/02/1160406
[21] United Nations Security Council. (1996, May 17). Security Council, 3660th meeting, provisional verbatim record (S/PV.3713). United Nations Official Document System. https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.3713
[22] United States Department of State. (2025, June 27). Peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda. https://www.state.gov/peace-agreement-between-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-the-republic-of-rwanda
[23] United States Department of State. (2025, December 4). Signing of the Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda [Press release]. https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/12/signing-of-the-washington-accords-for-peace-and-prosperity-between-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-rwanda
How to cite this paper
@article{1713399,
author = {Chinedu Okoli},
title = {The Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity: Path or Barrier to Sustainable Peace in the DRC-Rwanda Conflict},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {7},
pages = {577-583},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713399.pdf},
abstract = {The Washington Accords, initially signed on June 27, 2025, between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, mark a significant United States-brokered effort to address one of Africa?s most protracted and deadliest conflicts in the Great Lakes region. The subsequent December 2025 incorporation of the Regional Economic Integration Framework (REIF) expanded the accords? economic scope but did not resolve the structural flaws, as evidenced by continued M23 offensives and implementation failures. This article examines the Washington Accords to assess its prospect for delivering peace in the conflict-affected areas. The elite pact theory and a qualitative analytical approach are employed, drawing on official documents, expert commentary, reports to provide theoretical and interpretive depth, particularly in relation to the strategic security and mineral interests of the externally brokered parties. The accord provided for troop withdrawal, joint security coordination, refugee repatriation, and economic integration, but its structure excludes major non-state armed actors, contains limited enforcement and verification mechanisms, and prioritizes external economic interests over local accountability and inclusion. The article establishes that if these shortcomings are not addressed, the accord risks long-term failure and may follow the same pattern as previous peace agreements in the region. It therefore recommends dialogue with armed groups and the local communities, robust and independent monitoring mechanisms, and governance reform that addresses the underlying political and economic drivers of the conflict as necessary conditions for transforming the Accord into a framework for sustained peace.},
keywords = {Washington Accords, DRC-Rwanda conflict, Elite Pact, M23, peace agreement, Great Lakes, conflict resolution, REIF.},
month = {January},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713399}
}