Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713612
Impact of Partnering as a Procurement Method on Construction Project Delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria.
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Construction Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713612
Abstract
The construction industry continues to experience persistent challenges related to cost overruns, time delays, quality shortfalls, and safety risks, thereby necessitating the adoption of more collaborative procurement approaches. This study examined the impact of partnering as a procurement method on construction project delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria, using cost, time, quality, and safety as key performance indicators. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, and data were obtained from 676 respondents comprising consultants, contractors, and clients, selected from a population of 1,808 construction stakeholders through stratified random and purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, which achieved a Cronbach?s Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.81. Descriptive statistics, Relative Importance Index, and one-way Analysis of Variance were used for data analysis. The results showed that partnering had a high positive impact on all performance indicators, with group mean RII values of 0.805 for cost, 0.804 for time, 0.806 for quality, and 0.808 for safety. The highest-ranked effects included improved value-for-money outcomes (RII = 0.819), enhanced communication leading to faster workflow (RII = 0.816), improved construction quality through shared accountability (RII = 0.819), and improved site safety through joint planning (RII = 0.816). One-way ANOVA results indicated no statistically significant difference in the effects of partnering across cost, time, quality, and safety performance indicators (F = 1.729, p = 0.192), suggesting a relatively uniform influence of partnering on overall project delivery performance. The study concluded that partnering is an effective and holistic procurement method capable of simultaneously improving cost efficiency, time performance, construction quality, and safety outcomes in construction projects. It recommended increased adoption of partnering by public and private sector clients in Enugu State to enhance sustainable and high-performing construction project delivery.
Keywords
Partnering, procurement method, construction project delivery, cost, time, quality, safety, Enugu State.
References
[1] Abdul, A. A., Mat, M. M., Wan, A. R., Nasid, M. S., Ali, K. N., & Mohdzainordin, M. N. (2006). Procurement methods in construction projects: A comparative study. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(4), 287– 292.
[2] Ali, M., Paulos, S., Ole, H., Bjørn, A., & Ola, L. (2018). Partnering in construction: Prospects and challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 829 –842. https://
[3] Al-Amoudi, O. S. B. (2011). Factors affecting the selection of procurement methods in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 11(2), 75–89. https:// 1
[4] Allan Lowe Partnering and Scorecards Inc. (2019). Partnering best practices and scorecards. Sydney, Australia: Allan Lowe Consulting.
[5] Ashworth, A., & Hogg, K. (2007). Willis’s practice and procedure for the quantity surveyor (12th ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
[6] Awodele, O. A. (2012). Procurement systems and project performance in Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17(2), 85–98.
[7] Awodele, O. A., & Ogunsemi, D. R. (2018). Application of partnering principles in Nigerian construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(4), 401–415. https://
[8] Carr, P. G., Polkinghorn, B., La, R., & La, M. (2010). Partnering in construction: A practical guide. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(2), 92–100. https:// 5541.0000017
[9] Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., & Ho, K. S. K. (2010). Partnering in construction: Critical success factors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 71 –83. https:// 5479.0000011
[10] Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., & Chim, P. S. (2006). How relational contracting is applied in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), 846–854. https:// 9364(2006)132:8(846)
[11] Colledge, B. (2005). Relational contracting: Creating value beyond the project. Sydney, Australia: Construction Industry Institute Australia.
[12] Construction Industry Institute. (1991). In search of partnering excellence. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
[13] Dainty, A., Moore, D., & Murray, M. (2021). Communication in construction: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
[14] Ekung, S., Odesola, I., & Olatunji, S. (2013). Contractor involvement and procurement selection. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(1), 55–69.
[15] Eriksson, P. E. (2008). Procurement effects on cooperation in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(4), 387 –403. https://
[16] Eriksson, P. E. (2010). Partnering: What is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? Construction Management and Economics, 28(9), 905 –917. https://
[17] Francom, T. C., Asmar, M. E., & Ariaratnam, S. T. (2014). Evaluation of alternative project delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(4), 04013070. https:// 7862.0000803
[18] Hong, Y., Chan, D. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., & Yeung, J. F. Y. (2011). Relationship contracting in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), 997– 1007. https:// 7862.0000361
[19] Hughes, W., Hillebrandt, P., & Greenwood, D. (2021). Procurement in the construction industry (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
[20] Jon, B. (2019). Partnering as a procurement strategy in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 385–397. https://
[21] Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Irani, Z., & Sharif, A. M. (2012). Participatory action research approach to construction procurement. Construction Management and Economics, 30(2), 95 –107. https://
[22] Naoum, S. (2003). An overview into the concept of partnering. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 71 –76. https://
[23] Nwachukwu, C., Okeke, S., & Eze, E. (2023). Assessment of partnering utilization in construction projects in Enugu State. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 7(1), 45–58.
[24] Ofori, G. (2020). Construction in developing countries. London, England: Routledge.
[25] Ogunsanmi, O. E., & Bamisile, A. (1997). Factors affecting the selection of procurement systems. Journal of Construction Procurement, 3(2), 1–13.
[26] Ojo, S. O., & Aina, O. O. (2010). Procurement methods and project performance in Nigeria. Civil Engineering Dimension, 12(1), 1–7. https://
[27] Oyedele, L. O. (2013). Analysis of procurement selection criteria. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(12), 04013035. https:// 7862.0000754
[28] Popic, Z., & Moselhi, O. (2014). Project delivery systems selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(5), 04014017. https:// 7862.0000836
[29] Rahman, M. M., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). Joint risk management through partnering. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 245 –252. https://
[30] Rowlinson, S., & Cheung, Y. K. F. (2004). Partnering and alliancing in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(2), 91 –100. https://
[31] Samaraweera, A. (2013). Applicability of partnering in public sector projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(2), 175–188. https:// 02-2013-0008
[32] The National Academies of Sciences. (2009). Advancing project management practices in government. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[33] Thomas, S. R., & Thomas, H. R. (2008). Integrated teamwork and value creation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), 692 –700. https:// 9364(2008)134:9(692 )
[34] William, J. (1994). Partnering for success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
How to cite this paper
@article{1713612,
author = {Anoruo Longinus Obilo, Okoye Peter Uchenna, Okongwu Michael Ikechukwu, Uche Innocent Chidebelu},
title = {Impact of Partnering as a Procurement Method on Construction Project Delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria.},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {7},
pages = {1528-1536},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713612.pdf},
abstract = {The construction industry continues to experience persistent challenges related to cost overruns, time delays, quality shortfalls, and safety risks, thereby necessitating the adoption of more collaborative procurement approaches. This study examined the impact of partnering as a procurement method on construction project delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria, using cost, time, quality, and safety as key performance indicators. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, and data were obtained from 676 respondents comprising consultants, contractors, and clients, selected from a population of 1,808 construction stakeholders through stratified random and purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, which achieved a Cronbach?s Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.81. Descriptive statistics, Relative Importance Index, and one-way Analysis of Variance were used for data analysis. The results showed that partnering had a high positive impact on all performance indicators, with group mean RII values of 0.805 for cost, 0.804 for time, 0.806 for quality, and 0.808 for safety. The highest-ranked effects included improved value-for-money outcomes (RII = 0.819), enhanced communication leading to faster workflow (RII = 0.816), improved construction quality through shared accountability (RII = 0.819), and improved site safety through joint planning (RII = 0.816). One-way ANOVA results indicated no statistically significant difference in the effects of partnering across cost, time, quality, and safety performance indicators (F = 1.729, p = 0.192), suggesting a relatively uniform influence of partnering on overall project delivery performance. The study concluded that partnering is an effective and holistic procurement method capable of simultaneously improving cost efficiency, time performance, construction quality, and safety outcomes in construction projects. It recommended increased adoption of partnering by public and private sector clients in Enugu State to enhance sustainable and high-performing construction project delivery.},
keywords = {Partnering, procurement method, construction project delivery, cost, time, quality, safety, Enugu State.},
month = {January},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713612}
}