Regional Environmental Governance and the Transboundary Haze Problem in Southeast Asia

References

[1] ASEAN Secretariat. (2002). “ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution”. Association of Southeast Asian Nations, available at http://www.aseansec.org/agr_haze.pdf.

[2] Bennett, P. G. (1995). “Modelling decisions in international relations: game theory and beyond”. Mershon International Studies Review, 39(Supplement_1), 19-52.

[3] Bloomberg. (2013). “ASEAN leaders approve joint monitoring system to prevent haze”, October 10. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013- 10-10/asean-leadersapprove-joint-monitoring- system-to-prevent-haze

[4] Carmenta R, Zabala A, Trihadmojo B, Gaveau D, Salim MA and Phelps J. (2021). “Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia”. Global Environmental Change 67: 102154. https:// 4

[5] Ghani, F., Redzuan, N., Nasir, N., Salamat, M. (2017). “Review of Transboundary Haze Pollution Agreement 2002: Problems and Solutions”. Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture and Business (HLCB) Vol. 1: no. 1 (2017) -161.

[6] Guinness, H., Nurhayati, L, & Howes, S. (2016). “Indonesia, ASEAN and the Problem of Transboundary Haze”. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, February 2016.

[7] Ho, S. (2019). “By the Numbers: Economic Impact of Southeast Asia’s Haze”. Al Jazeera. Published on 13 September 2019.

[8] Howes, S., Agarwal, V., & Woolf, M. (2024). Growth, Inequality and the Environment: An Introduction. Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU.

[9] Jakarta Globe. (2009). "Malaysia, United States Offer Assistance as Riau Struggles with Fires". Published on 15 July, http://thejakartaglobe.com/national/malaysia- united-states-offerassistance-as-riau-struggles- with-fires/318329.

[10] Mai, L. (2023). “Extinguishing a Point of Contention: Examining Transboundary Haze in Southeast Asia”. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C. Published on 17 November 2023.

[11] Ohlin, J. D. (2012). “Nash equilibrium and international law”. European journal of international law, 23(4), 915-940.

[12] Purnomo, H, B Okarda, B Shantiko, R Achdiawan, A Dermawan, H Kartodihardjo, and A.A Dewayani. (2019). “Forest and Land Fires, Toxic Haze and Local Politics in Indonesia.” International Forestry Review, 486–500. https://

[13] Robertua, V., & Sigalingging, L. (2019). “Indonesia Environmental Diplomacy Reformed: Case studies of Greening ASEAN Way and Peat Restoration Agency”. Andalas Journal of International Studies, 8(1), 1-15.

[14] Snidal, D. (1985). “Coordination versus prisoners' dilemma: Implications for international cooperation and regimes”. American Political Science Review, 79(4), 923- 942.

[15] Sunchindah, A. (2015). “Transboundary Haze Pollution Problem in Southeast Asia: Reframing ASEAN’s Responses”, ERIA Discussion Paper Series, No.82.

[16] Tacconi, L., Jotzo, F. & Grafton, Q. (2008). “Local Causes, Regional Co-Operation and Global Financing for Environmental Problems: The Case of Southeast Asian Haze Pollution”. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, vol.8, no.1, pp.1- 16.

[17] Toha, K & Collier, W.L. (2015) “Land control, Governance and agrarian conflict in Indonesia”, Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, March 23-27, 2015, Washington DC.

[18] Werf, G. R , Dempewolf, J., Trigg, S., Randerson, J. T., Kasibhatla, P. S., Giglio, L., Murdiyarso, D. (2008). “Climate Regulation of Fire Emissions and Deforestation in Equatorial Asia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 20350 –55. https://

@article{1713676,
      author = {Vaibhav Pramod Karajgikar},
      title = {Regional Environmental Governance and the Transboundary Haze Problem in Southeast Asia},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {1502-1508},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713676.pdf},
      abstract = {Transboundary haze resulting from forest and peatland fires in Indonesia imposes substantial environmental, public health, and economic costs on Malaysia. Despite Indonesia?s formal ban on peatland conversion, weak financing, monitoring, and enforcement have limited effective compliance. This paper analyses the haze problem using a game theory framework, modelling Malaysia and Indonesia?s interactions as a ?Prisoner?s Dilemma? in which each state has incentives to underinvest in mitigation while free-riding on the efforts of others. Such strategic incentives produce a collectively suboptimal equilibrium, explaining the persistence of haze despite shared regional costs. The paper argues that the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution (ATHP) can mitigate this dilemma by altering payoffs through cooperation, monitoring, and repeated interaction. Strengthening the treaty?s accountability and compensation mechanisms, particularly via increased side payments from Malaysia and the international community, can reduce incentives to defect by lowering Indonesia?s compliance costs and increasing the benefits of cooperation. These resources can support joint monitoring, firefighting, peatland restoration, and livelihood alternatives for farmers, while empowering subnational enforcement. By institutionalizing cooperation and enabling credible commitments, the ATHP could transform the strategic environment from non-cooperation to sustained collaboration, offering a feasible pathway to reducing transboundary haze while respecting regional norms of sovereignty.},
      keywords = {ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution (ATHP), Collective Action Problem, Game Theory, International Environmental Cooperation, Prisoner?s Dilemma, Transboundary Haze Pollution (THP)},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713676}
  }