Empirical Validation of an Adaptive Spatial Hierarchical Bayesian SEIR Model for HIV Transmission Dynamics in Kenya

References

[1] Besag, J., York, J., & Mollié, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43(1), 1- 20. https://

[2] Blangiardo, M., & Cameletti, M. (2015). Spatial and spatio-temporal Bayesian models with R-INLA. John Wiley & Sons.

[3] Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), 1 -32. https://

[4] Cuadros, D. F., García-Ramos, A. L., & Tanser, F. (2017). Spatial epidemiology of HIV in rural South Africa. Spatial Demography, 5, 205 -224. https://

[5] Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

[6] Hallett, T. B., Ghys, P. D., & Bärnighausen, T. (2019). The future of HIV modelling: A more inclusive approach. The Lancet HIV, 6(12), e817-e819. https:// 3018(19)30345-8

[7] Hethcote, H. W. (2000). The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Review, 42(4), 599- 653. https://

[8] Jewell, B. L., Balzer, L. B., & Clark, T. D. (2022). Ensemble machine learning for HIV incidence prediction. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 89, 11-19.

[9] Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A, 115, 700- 721.

[10] Mwangi, J., Ng'ang'a, L., & Waruiru, W. (2019). Spatial heterogeneity in HIV prevalence: An analysis of the 2018 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0225315. https://

[11] National AIDS Control Council. (2022). Kenya HIV estimates report 2022. NACC.

[12] Odhiambo, J. N., Mwau, M., & Adipo, R. (2020). Spatial analysis of HIV prevalence in Kenya: Identifying hotspots for targeted interventions. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1- 12. https:// 08539-x

[13] Park, J., Kaufman, Z., & Rosenberg, E. (2021). Machine learning for HIV incidence prediction in Kenya. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 24, e25678.

[14] Rue, H., Riebler, A., Sørbye, S. H., Illian, J. B., Simpson, D. P., & Lindgren, F. K. (2017). Bayesian computing with INLA: A review. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 395 -421. https:// 060116-054045

[15] UNAIDS. (2023). Global HIV statistics 2023. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.

@article{1713792,
      author = {Mulati Omukoba Nyukuri},
      title = {Empirical Validation of an Adaptive Spatial Hierarchical Bayesian SEIR Model for HIV Transmission Dynamics in Kenya},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {2971-2977},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713792.pdf},
      abstract = {This study presents the empirical validation of an adaptive spatial hierarchical Bayesian SEIR model developed for modeling HIV transmission dynamics in Kenya. Using comprehensive HIV surveillance data from 15 strategically selected Kenyan counties spanning 2015-2024 (1,620 county-month observations), the model was validated through comparative analysis with benchmark approaches, sensitivity testing, and policy scenario evaluation. Data sources included the Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Health Information System, and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The validation framework employed multiple performance metrics including Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), correlation coefficients, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) for hotspot detection. Results demonstrated that the proposed model achieved superior predictive accuracy with 48% improvement in prediction errors (RMSE = 0.035) compared to non-spatial approaches and 22% improvement over static spatial models. Diebold-Mariano tests confirmed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) across all benchmark comparisons. Sensitivity analysis revealed transmission rate as the most influential parameter (first-order Sobol index = 0.34), while the model maintained robust performance with up to 20% missing data. The validated model identified substantial spatial heterogeneity in basic reproduction numbers ranging from 0.3 in Wajir to 3.2 in Homabay counties. These findings validate the model for evidence-based resource allocation, early warning systems for emerging transmission hotspots, and adaptive HIV program management in Kenya and similar resource-limited settings.},
      keywords = {HIV/AIDS Modeling, Bayesian Inference, Spatial Epidemiology, SEIR Model, Model Validation, Kenya},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713792}
  }