Comparative Evaluation of The Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridge Structures

References

[1] Agarwal, R., Dinesh, G., Nair, D., Patel, B. K., Verma, N. A., & Choudhury, B. N. (2019, May). Comparative study of reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete flexural elements: Sectional and structural properties. ResearchGate, 153–156.

[2] Ahmed, K. S., Habib, M. A., & Asef, M. F. (2021, December). Flexural response of stainless steel reinforced concrete beam. Structures, 34, 589–603.

[3] Angomas, F. (2009). The use of prestressed concrete in modern bridge design. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(3), 145–160.

[4] Burger, H., Tepho, T., Fischer, O., & Schramm, N. (2023). Performance assessment of existing prestressed concrete bridges utilizing distributed optical fiber sensors. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001986

[5] Calderone, A. J., Lehman, D. E., & Moehle, J. P. (2000). Behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns having varying aspect ratios and varying lengths of confinement (PEER Report No. 2000-08). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

[6] Chen, W., Li, J., & Zhao, T. (2021). Experimental study on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete for bridge structures.

[7] Choi, H., Park, H., & Lee, S. (2018). Efficient material utilization in prestressed concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(4), 04018019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001986

[8] De Domenico, D., et al. (2021). (Cited in file).

[9] Dolan, C. W., & Hamilton, H. R. (2018). Prestressed concrete: Building, design, and construction. Springer.

[10] Eurocode 2. (2004). Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings (EN 1992-1-1). European Committee for Standardization.

[11] arcia, H., Park, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Efficient material utilization in prestressed concrete bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 29(4), 210–223.

[12] Gilbert, R. I., & Mickleborough, N. C. (1990). Design of prestressed concrete. Springer.

[13] Hemalatha, K., James, C., Natrayan, L., & Swamynadh, V. (2021). Analysis of RCC T-beam and prestressed concrete box girder bridges super structure under different span conditions. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37, 1507–1516.

[14] Hiba, Z., & Branko, G. (2019). Applications of prestressed concrete in modern structures. Construction Materials Journal, 73(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conmat.2019.03.014

[15] Hsu, T. T. C. (1993). Unified theory of reinforced concrete. CRC Press.

[16] Izzet, A. F., & Abdulhameed, A. A. (2017). Prestressed concrete: A fundamental approach, ACI 318‐11 code philosophy & stresses limitations. ResearchGate, 1–5.

[17] Jadhav, R. B., & More, A. B. (2017). Time and cost comparison of PSC superstructure with RCC for river bridge. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(6), 1762–1765.

[18] Jyothirmayee, S., et al. (2024). A comparative study on design of commercial building using ETABS and STAAD Pro. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2779(1), 012035.

[19] Kim, H. T., Seong, D. J., & Shin, H. M. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of hollow reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridge columns. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.

[20] Kumar, A., & Malik, A. (2015). Methodology & materials for prestressed concrete. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 3(6), 190–192.

[21] Kurniawan, A. R. (2023). Comparative study on performance-based seismic design criteria for continuously reinforced concrete bridge. ResearchGate.

[22] Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2020). Spanning capabilities of prestressed concrete in bridge construction. International Journal of Bridge Engineering, 29(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1715889

[23] Lei, Y. (2023). Assessment of existing concrete bridges by load testing. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.

[24] Li, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Sustainable bridge maintenance and management: A review of recent developments.

[25] Li, S., Zhao, et al. (2020). (Cited in file.)

[26] Lin, T. Y., & Burns, N. H. (1981). Design of prestressed concrete structures (3rd ed.). Wiley.

[27] Liu, H., Li, J., Zhang, J., & Pang, D. (2022). Decision analysis of reinforcement schemes for prestressed concrete bridges. Buildings, 12(10), 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101771

[28] Liu, X., Li, J., Tsang, H. H., Wang, J., & Zhong, J. (2020). Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of unbonded prestressed RC columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(10), 04020152.

[29] Liu, Y., Pang, B., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Life-cycle maintenance strategy of bridges considering reliability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134740.

[30] Manisekar, R. (2020). Monitoring prestress in prestressed concrete bridges: Suggestions. Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, 51–54.

[31] Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2017). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[32] Mohammed, H. A. (2018–2020). Multiple works on reinforced and prestressed concrete. ResearchGate.

[33] Naaman, A. E. (2012). Prestressed concrete analysis and design: Fundamentals. Techno Press.

[34] Nilson, A. H., Darwin, D., & Dolan, C. W. (2010). Design of concrete structures (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[35] Ortiz, J. D., et al. (2023). FRP-reinforced/strengthened concrete: Durability and mechanical effects. Materials, 16(5), 1990.

[36] Pacheco-Torgal, F., Ding, Y., & Jalali, S. (2021). Durability and challenges in prestressed concrete structures. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 19(1), 85–95.

[37] Pal, D. (2023). Numerical study on dynamic response of integral bridges.

[38] Rafieizonooz, M., et al. (2024). Steel and composite prestressed tendons: A review. Heliyon, 10(11).

[39] Rahal, K. N. (2021). A unified approach to shear and torsion in RC. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 77(5), 691–703.

[40] Rajani, A., Gopika, D., Darshan, N., & Balaji, N. C. (2020). Comparative study of RC and PSC flexural elements. ResearchGate.

[41] Sabouni, A. R. (2023). Advances in reinforced concrete integrity and failure. In Advances in Structural Integrity and Failure.

[42] Shah, W. M., Shah, H. M., Scurtu, C. I., & Dragan, C. (2021). Performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frame structures. Journal of Building Performance.

[43] Sharma, A., & Kushwah, S. S. (2015). Comparative analysis of RC and PSC beams. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5(4), 2564–2566.

[44] Strauss, A., Bergmeister, K., et al. (2023). Through-life management of structures. ce/papers, 6(5), 627–634.

[45] Tong, T., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., & Yu, Q. (2016). Long-term performance of prestressed bridges under creep effects. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(10), 04016125.

[46] Transit New Zealand. (2001). Bridge inspection and maintenance manual.

[47] Wang, P., Li, Z., & Liu, Y. (2022). Design and construction of long-span PC bridges: A review.

[48] Wang, W. (2023). Mechanical research on reinforced concrete materials. Materials, 16(21), 6892.

[49] Zhang, J., Li, S., & Xin, Y. (2023). Seismic fragility analysis of prestressed bridges using ML techniques.

@article{1714349,
      author = {John Engbonye Sani, Khalifa G. Salihu, Ifeanyi A. Chukwujama, Thankgod O. Agbo},
      title = {Comparative Evaluation of The Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridge Structures},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {939-946},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714349.pdf},
      abstract = {This study presents a comparative evaluation of reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PSC) bridge systems using two representative case studies in Kaduna, Nigeria: the Queen Amina Flyover (RC) and the Arewa House Overpass (PSC). Structural design documents, material specifications, influence line deflection analysis, visual inspections, and stakeholder perspectives were used to assess span capability, reinforcement demand, concrete grade, serviceability performance, and long-term durability. Results show that PSC demonstrates superior structural efficiency, accommodating longer spans with reduced structural depth and significantly lower mid-span deflection due to prestressing-induced stiffness. PSC also utilized higher concrete grades (C40–C50), resulting in enhanced durability and improved resistance to surface cracking and environmental degradation compared to RC, which employed C30 concrete. Reinforcement density was substantially lower in PSC girders, highlighting improved material economy. Visual and qualitative assessments further confirmed PSC’s reduced deterioration and lower expected maintenance requirements. Despite these advantages, RC remains widely adopted due to lower initial cost, availability of local skills, and reduced technological demands. The overall findings indicate that PSC offers superior life-cycle performance, while RC remains suitable for short-span and budget-constrained applications in developing countries.},
      keywords = {Prestressed Concrete, Reinforced Concrete, Structural Performance, Serviceability and Deflection, Material Durability, Developing-Country Infrastructure},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714349}
  }