Embodied Worship and The Resilience of Aura: An Empirical Investigation at Sri Parthasarathy Swamy Temple, Chennai

References

[1] Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217–251). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1936)

[2] Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.

[3] Assmann, J. (2006). Religion and cultural memory. Stanford University Press.

[4] Benjamin, A. (2006). Aura and authenticity. Journal of Visual Culture, 5(1), 5–22.

[5] Benjamin, W. (1936). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 5(1), 40–68.

[6] Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations (H. Arendt, Ed.). Schocken Books.

[7] Benjamin, W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1936)

[8] Benjamin, W. (2002). Selected writings: Volume 3, 1935–1938. Harvard University Press.

[9] Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1996). Remediation. Configurations, 4(3), 311–358.

[10] Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.

[11] Chidester, D. (2000). Material terms for the study of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 68(2), 367–380.

[12] Couldry, N. (2000). The place of media power. Media, Culture & Society, 22(3), 355–371.

[13] Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

[14] Eck, D. L. (1981). Darśan: Seeing the divine image in India. History of Religions, 20(1), 1–27.

[15] Eisenlohr, P. (2011). Media and religious transformation. Social Anthropology, 19(1), 37–55.

[16] Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harcourt Brace.

[17] Fuller, C. J. (1986). Hindu ritual and its interpretations. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 20(2), 165–195.

[18] Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

[19] Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.

[20] Hansen, M. B. (2008). Benjamin’s aura. Critical Inquiry, 34(2), 336–375.

[21] Kittler, F. (1994). The history of communication media. New German Critique, 61, 165–180.

[22] Latour, B. (2001). Iconoclash, or is there a world beyond the image wars? Critical Inquiry, 27(3), 418–440.

[23] Meyer, B. (2011). Mediating absence—Effecting spiritual presence. Social Research, 78(4), 1029–1056.

[24] Morgan, D. (2008). The materiality of cultural construction. Religion, 38(1), 11–30.

[25] Pinney, C. (2002). Photos of the gods. History and Anthropology, 13(3), 201–226.

[26] Plate, S. B. (2010). Religion, art, and visual culture. Material Religion, 6(2), 226–245.

[27] Scannell, P. (1987). Media and communication. Sociology, 21(3), 377–390.

[28] Srinivas, M. N. (1956). Religion and society among the Coorgs. Journal of Asian Studies, 15(4), 481–495.

[29] Thomas, N. (2001). The aura of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 6(1), 15–34.

[30] Turner, V. (1983). Religious paradigms and political action. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 25(2), 221–244.

[31] Urban, H. B. (2005). The politics of aura in Hindu nationalism. The Journal of Religion, 85(3), 363–397.

@article{1714393,
      author = {S. R. Sharansrinivasan},
      title = {Embodied Worship and The Resilience of Aura: An Empirical Investigation at Sri Parthasarathy Swamy Temple, Chennai},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {2115-2117},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714393.pdf},
      abstract = {Walter Benjamin’s theory of aura proposes that mechanical reproduction diminishes the unique presence of an artwork by detaching it from its ritual and spatial context. While this thesis has been widely explored in literature, cinema, and visual art, empirical research within living religious spaces remains limited. This study investigates the persistence of aura in the sacred environment of Sri Parthasarathy Swamy Temple, Triplicane, Chennai. Using survey data collected from 48 devotees, the research analyzes perceptions of sacred presence, ritual engagement, collective devotion, and attitudes toward mediated worship. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, and relationships among variables were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation and chi-square tests. Findings indicate a significant negative correlation between aura perception and acceptance of mechanical reproduction (rₛ = −.53, p < .01) and a positive correlation between visit frequency and aura intensity (rₛ = .47, p < .01). Results demonstrate that embodied ritual participation sustains cult value despite technological mediation. The study empirically substantiates Benjamin’s aura-decay thesis while demonstrating the resilience of aura within contemporary devotional practice.},
      keywords = {Aura, Mechanical Reproduction, Ritual Presence, Cult Value, Sacred Space, Walter Benjamin},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714393}
  }