Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714430
Level of Community Participation in Participatory Forest Management in Muguga Forest, Kiambu, Kenya
Subject area: Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences · Area of research: Participatory Forest Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714430
Abstract
Participatory Forest Management emerged as a response to centralized forest governance systems that excluded local communities, often resulting in forest degradation and weakened local stewardship. This study assessed the role of communities in PFM in Muguga Forest, Kiambu County, Kenya. Specifically, it examined how local communities participate in forest governance and conservation activities. Descriptive survey approaches were adopted. Sampling was done using census approach where the target group, N=150 was surveyed, primary data were collected from 102 registered MERCFA members (68% response rate out of 150 active members) through questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and observation. Secondary data were obtained from institutional reports. Findings indicate that communities play central roles in tree planting, nursery establishment, forest patrols, environmental awareness creation, and regulated cut-and-carry grazing. They also engage in forest-based enterprises such as beekeeping and ecotourism. Although community participation has strengthened local stewardship and improved conservation awareness, forest recovery remains unstable due to financial constraints, weak enforcement, limited market access, and low youth engagement. The study concludes that sustainable PFM depends on empowered community roles, equitable benefit-sharing, and strong institutional support under the Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016).
Keywords
Participatory Forest Management, Community Participation, Community Forest Association (CFA), Muguga Environmental Research Community Forest Association (MERCFA), Participatory Forest Management Plans
References
[1] Blomley, T., & Ramadhani, H. (2006). Going to scale with Participatory Forest Management: early lessons from Tanzania. International Forestry Review, 8(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.8.1.93. Accessed on 20th November 2025
[2] Chisika, S., & Yeom, C. (2024a). The Implication of the Changing Forest Management Paradigms in Formulating Forestry Policies in Kenya. FORESTIST. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2024.23040. Accessed on 15th March 2025.
[3] Edward, J. N., Mwendwa, P. K., & Kimeu, R. M. (2024). Dynamics of Participatory Forest Management (PFM) activities by Community Forest Association (CFA) and Implications on Conservation of Iveti Forest in Machakos County, Kenya. Cedred.org. http://cedred.org/jais/index.php/issues. Accessed on 9th August 2025.
[4] FAO. (2020a). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753en .Accessed on 5th February 2025
[5] FAO. (2020b). The State of the World’s Forests 2020. FAO and UNEP. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en. Accessed on 5th February 2025
[6] Farthing, L. (2024, May). Fewer wildfires, great biodiversity: what is the secret to the success of Mexico’s forests? The Guardian; The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/may/01/fewer-wildfires-great-biodiversity-what-is-the-secret-to-the-success-of-mexicos-forests? Accessed on 13th February 2025
[7] Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. https://www.ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/29095/1/Frederick%20J%20Gravetter_2017.pdf. Accessed on 15th August 2025
[8] Kimiri, K. L., Ming’ate, F. L. M., & Kioko, E. M. (2023). Community Forest Associations Boundaries and Sustainable Forest Management in Loita Forest, Narok County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Geographical Research, 6(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2023/v6i4200. Accessed on 30th September 2025.
[9] Koech, C. K., Ongugo, P. O., M T E Mbuvi, & Maua, J. O. (2009). Community Forest Associations in Kenya: challenges and opportunities. Kenya Forestry Research Institute. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362619710_Community_Forest_Associations_in_Kenya_challenges_and_opportunities. Accessed on 24th October 2025.
[10] Matiku, P., Caleb, M., & Callistus, O. (2013). The Impact of Participatory Forest Management on Local Community Livelihoods in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Conservation and Society, 11(2), 112–129. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26393104. Accessed on 10th December 2025.
[11] Mbeche, R., Ateka, J., Herrmann, R., & Grote, U. (2021). Understanding forest users’ participation in participatory forest management (PFM): Insights from Mt. Elgon Forest ecosystem, Kenya. Forest Policy and Economics, 129, 102507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102507. Accessed on 20th December 2025.
[12] Mutune, J. M., & Lund, J. F. (2016). Unpacking the impacts of “participatory” forestry policies: Evidence from Kenya. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.004. Accessed on 9th May 2025.
[13] Mwangi, E., Mogoi, J., Ongugo, P., Obonyo, E., & Oeba, V. (2021). Communities, property rights and forest decentralisation in Kenya: Early lessons from participatory forestry management. Conservation and Society, 10(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.97490. Accessed on 15th May 2025.
[14] Okumu, B., & Muchapondwa, E. (2020). Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations. Forest Policy and Economics, 113(102122), 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102122. Accessed on 15th October 2025.
[15] Saigal, S. (2003). Improving forest governance: Experience of Joint Forest Management in India. Social Change, 33(2-3), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570303300303. Accessed on 22nd May 2025.
[16] Siedlecki, S. (2020, January). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods | Request PDF. ResearchGate; www.researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338300876_Understanding_Descriptive_Research_Designs_and_Methods. Accessed on 22nd May 2025.
[17] Tenge, F. M., & Morara, J. (2020). Impact of participatory forest management on rural livelihoods and forest conservation in Kenya: A case of Upper Imenti Forest. Juniperpublishers.com. https://juniperpublishers.com/ijesnr/IJESNR.MS.ID.556119.php. Accessed on 3rd December 2025.
[18] Tito, M., Ndalilo, L. A., Matiku, P., & Gacheru, P. (2023, December 14). participatory forest management in kenya lessons learned after twenty years of implementation (1997 to 2018). Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376516201_participatory_forest_management_in_kenya_lessons_learned_after_twenty_years_of_implementation_1997_to_2018. Accessed on 10th December 2025.
[19] Xu, J., White, A., & Lele, U. (2010). China’s Forest Tenure Reforms Impacts and implications for choice, conservation, and climate change. https://rightsandresources.org/wp-content/uploads/China-long-report-final-LP-edit-Jan20.pdf. Accessed on 10th May 2025.
How to cite this paper
@article{1714430,
author = {Kiprono Gloria Jeptoo, Mireri Caleb},
title = {Level of Community Participation in Participatory Forest Management in Muguga Forest, Kiambu, Kenya},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {8},
pages = {2118-2123},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714430.pdf},
abstract = {Participatory Forest Management emerged as a response to centralized forest governance systems that excluded local communities, often resulting in forest degradation and weakened local stewardship. This study assessed the role of communities in PFM in Muguga Forest, Kiambu County, Kenya. Specifically, it examined how local communities participate in forest governance and conservation activities. Descriptive survey approaches were adopted. Sampling was done using census approach where the target group, N=150 was surveyed, primary data were collected from 102 registered MERCFA members (68% response rate out of 150 active members) through questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and observation. Secondary data were obtained from institutional reports. Findings indicate that communities play central roles in tree planting, nursery establishment, forest patrols, environmental awareness creation, and regulated cut-and-carry grazing. They also engage in forest-based enterprises such as beekeeping and ecotourism. Although community participation has strengthened local stewardship and improved conservation awareness, forest recovery remains unstable due to financial constraints, weak enforcement, limited market access, and low youth engagement. The study concludes that sustainable PFM depends on empowered community roles, equitable benefit-sharing, and strong institutional support under the Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016).},
keywords = {Participatory Forest Management, Community Participation, Community Forest Association (CFA), Muguga Environmental Research Community Forest Association (MERCFA), Participatory Forest Management Plans},
month = {February},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714430}
}