International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714683

1714683 Vol 9 · Issue 8 Download Paper

Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities

Mansi Pandey Anudeep Dwivedi

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Education

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683

Abstract

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes the integration of technology in teaching and learning to enhance accessibility, quality, and flexibility in higher education. Digital pedagogy, including online and blended learning, virtual labs, Learning Management Systems (LMS), MOOCs, and digital assessment tools, has become central to teacher education institutions, particularly in Tier-2 cities. This paper examines the extent of digital adoption in these institutions and its impact on student academic performance and engagement. Drawing upon both policy analysis and perception-based surveys, the study investigates how the availability of smart classrooms, recorded lectures, faculty digital training, and online learning platforms influence conceptual clarity, assignment completion, attendance, and overall academic outcomes. Additionally, it explores the implementation gap arising from infrastructural constraints, faculty readiness, and socio-economic factors. The study also contextualizes modern digital pedagogy with the traditional guru Kul system, highlighting that just as ancient education emphasized holistic development—moral, intellectual, and practical—effective digital teachers today must combine technical proficiency with pedagogical empathy to foster meaningful learning. The findings suggest that while NEP 2020 has accelerated digital adoption in Tier-2 teacher education institutions, achieving optimal academic engagement requires a balanced approach that integrates technology with human-centric teaching practices.

Keywords

Digital Pedagogy, NEP 2020, Teacher Education, Tier-2 Cities, Academic Engagement

References

[1] Aaradhi, V., & Chakraborty, D. (2024). EdTech applications and their adoption in Indian education sector – a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. HESWBL, 14(2), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2022-0192

[2] Ayanwale, M. A., et al. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3.

[3] Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2).

[4] Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review. Higher Education.

[5] Bhattacharya, I., & Sharma, K. (2007). India in the knowledge economy – an electronic paradigm. International Journal of Educational Management.

[6] Bond, M., et al. (2024). A meta-systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1).

[7] Cazden, C., et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1).

[8] Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: an empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate AI-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138.

[9] Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6.

[10] Deepika Chauhan (2025). Open educational practices and virtual learning readiness among B.Ed. trainees. Forum for Education Studies, 3(1). ojs.acad-pub.com

[11] Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4).

[12] Holmes, W., & Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence in education: practices, challenges, and debates. Taylor & Francis.

[13] Ilomäki, L., et al. (2023). Critical digital literacies at school level: a systematic review. Review of Education, 11(3).

[14] Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1).

[15] Kreber, C. (2015). Reviving the ancient virtues in the scholarship of teaching, with a slight critical twist. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3).

[16] Laupichler, M. C., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: a scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3.

[17] Luckin, R., et al. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3.

[18] Mariya, & Ansari, S. N. (2026). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education with Reference to Quality Enhancement, Challenges and Future Prospects. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1).

[19] Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). AI and education: a guidance for policymakers. UNESCO Publishing.

[20] Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.

[21] Nazaretsky, T., et al. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4).

[22] Ng, D. T. K., et al. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: an exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2.

[23] NITI Aayog. (2021). National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: #AIforAll. Government of India.

[24] Palmer, P. J. (2017). The Courage to Teach: Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher's Life. Jossey-Bass.

[25] Radhakrishnan, S. (1948). The Bhagavadgita. George Allen & Unwin.

[26] Southworth, J., et al. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4.

[27] Wang, X., et al. (2023). Preparing for AI-enhanced education: Conceptualizing and empirically examining teachers’ AI readiness. Computers in Human Behavior, 146.

How to cite this paper

Mansi Pandey , Anudeep Dwivedi "Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 8 2026 Page 1990-1996 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683
Mansi Pandey , Anudeep Dwivedi "Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683
Mansi Pandey , Anudeep Dwivedi (2026). Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683
Mansi Pandey , Anudeep Dwivedi "Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683
@article{1714683,
      author = {Mansi Pandey , Anudeep Dwivedi},
      title = {Digital Pedagogy under NEP 2020 and Student Academic Engagement: A Policy-Based Analytical Study of Teacher Education Institutions in Tier-2 Cities},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {1990-1996},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714683.pdf},
      abstract = {The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes the integration of technology in teaching and learning to enhance accessibility, quality, and flexibility in higher education. Digital pedagogy, including online and blended learning, virtual labs, Learning Management Systems (LMS), MOOCs, and digital assessment tools, has become central to teacher education institutions, particularly in Tier-2 cities. This paper examines the extent of digital adoption in these institutions and its impact on student academic performance and engagement. Drawing upon both policy analysis and perception-based surveys, the study investigates how the availability of smart classrooms, recorded lectures, faculty digital training, and online learning platforms influence conceptual clarity, assignment completion, attendance, and overall academic outcomes. Additionally, it explores the implementation gap arising from infrastructural constraints, faculty readiness, and socio-economic factors. The study also contextualizes modern digital pedagogy with the traditional guru Kul system, highlighting that just as ancient education emphasized holistic development—moral, intellectual, and practical—effective digital teachers today must combine technical proficiency with pedagogical empathy to foster meaningful learning. The findings suggest that while NEP 2020 has accelerated digital adoption in Tier-2 teacher education institutions, achieving optimal academic engagement requires a balanced approach that integrates technology with human-centric teaching practices.},
      keywords = {Digital Pedagogy, NEP 2020, Teacher Education, Tier-2 Cities, Academic Engagement},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714683}
  }