International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714692

1714692 Vol 6 · Issue 11 Download Paper

The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises

Zakaria Ferdous Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura Susmita Saha Mitun Roy

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Corporate Governance

DOI: 10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692

Abstract

The economic and geopolitical crises have become more systemic, causing disruptions that threaten the strategic sustainability, operational stability, and long-term survival of firms. This paper analyzes how corporate governance is a key tool in enhancing the resilience of firms in volatile environments. It defines resilience as a dynamic ability that is determined by governance systems, board efficiency, risk management practices, technological flexibility, and stakeholder-focused decision-making. The analysis combines the findings of the modern literature on the effects of crisis, digital transformation, supply chain disruption, strategic risk management, and stakeholder governance to substantiate how governance processes enhance the capacity of firms to predict shocks, absorb disruption, and rebound from adverse conditions. The article maintains that good governance leads to resilience in a variety of ways: strengthening strategic control and accountability, facilitating an informed and timely response in case of crisis, creating innovations and technological responsiveness, and aligning corporate response with larger stakeholder and sustainability expectations. It also points to the variability in governance response to economic and geopolitical crisis situations, and institutional and sectoral situations. The article builds on the knowledge of the role of corporate governance as not a simple compliance or structuring scheme, but a strategic and organizational resilience provider during times of deep uncertainty through the development of an integrative conceptual lens. The discussion also provides practical implications for boards, regulators, and other policymakers who aim to enhance the governance structure that can help create resilient and crisis-ready organizations.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Firm Resilience, Economic Crises, Geopolitical Crises, Board Effectiveness, Risk Management and Oversight, Stakeholder Governance

References

[1] Akram, K., Mamun, M. A., Raza, S. A., & Suleman, M. T. (2024). Global geopolitical crisis and tourism development in the USA. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(20), 3352–3368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2262709

[2] Andersen, T. J., Sax, J., & Giannozzi, A. (2022). Conjoint effects of interacting strategy-making processes and lines of defense practices in strategic Risk Management: An empirical study. Long Range Planning, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102164

[3] Ashraf, M., Choudhary, P., & Jaggi, J. (2024). Are Audit Committees Overloaded? Evidence from the Effect of Financial Risk Management Oversight on Financial Reporting Quality. Management Science, 70(12), 8414–8447. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00360

[4] Beasley, M., Branson, B., Pagach, D., & Panfilo, S. (2021). Are required SEC proxy disclosures about the board’s role in risk oversight substantive? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106816

[5] Chen, C., Pan, J., Liu, S., & Feng, T. (2023). Impact of digital capability on firm resilience: the moderating role of coopetition behavior. Business Process Management Journal, 29(7), 2167–2190. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2023-0095

[6] Cherfane, M., Boueri, M., Issa, E., Abdallah, R., Hamam, A., Sbeity, K., … Abi-Gerges, A. (2024). Unveiling the unseen toll: exploring the impact of the Lebanese economic crisis on the health-seeking behaviors in a sample of patients with diabetes and hypertension. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18116-6

[7] Cui, L., Wu, H., Wu, L., Kumar, A., & Tan, K. H. (2023). Investigating the relationship between digital technologies, supply chain integration and firm resilience in the context of COVID-19. Annals of Operations Research, 327(2), 825–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04735-y

[8] de Villiers, C., & Dimes, R. (2021). Determinants, mechanisms and consequences of corporate governance reporting: a research framework. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09530-0

[9] Haftel, Y. Z., & Nadel, B. (2024). Economic crises and the survival of international organizations. Review of International Organizations, 19(4), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09549-0

[10] Hatipoglu, E., Soytas, M. A., & Belaïd, F. (2023). Environmental consequences of geopolitical crises: The case of economic sanctions and emissions. Resources Policy, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104011

[11] Hernández-Hernández, J. A., Londoño-Pineda, A., Cano, J. A., & Gómez-Montoya, R. (2023). Stakeholder governance and sustainability in football: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18942

[12] Ho, V. H. (2012). Corporate governance as risk regulation in China: A comparative view of risk oversight, risk management, and accountability. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00002403

[13] Horstmeyer, D. (2020). Formation of a student managed investment fund: risk management and oversight. Managerial Finance, 46(5), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2018-0396

[14] Istrefi, V. (2020). Corporate governance in islamic financial institutions. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 9(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv9i2art5

[15] Johnson, K. (2011). Addressing Gaps in the Dodd-Frank Act: Directors’ Risk Management Oversight Obligations. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, (45.1), 55. https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.45.1.addressing

[16] Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(2), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1883

[17] Kyrdoda, Y., Balzano, M., & Marzi, G. (2023). Learn to survive crises: The role of firm resilience, innovation capabilities and environmental dynamism. Technology in Society, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102285

[18] Martinez-Jimenez, R., Hernández-Ortiz, M. J., & Cabrera Fernández, A. I. (2020). Gender diversity influence on board effectiveness and business performance. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0206

[19] Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024). Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584

[20] Naeem, M. A., Hamouda, F., Karim, S., & Vigne, S. A. (2023). Return and volatility spillovers among global assets: Comparing health crisis with geopolitical crisis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 87, 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.008

[21] Nguyen, Q., Kim, M. H., & Ali, S. (2024). Corporate governance and earnings management: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. International Review of Economics and Finance, 89, 775–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.084

[22] Pamungkas, I. D., Purwantoro, Sari, M. P., & Hersugondo. (2023). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance on Firm Value: The Case of Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.10

[23] Ran, R., Zhang, J., Yang, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). Can technological diversity drive firm resilience? Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Business Research, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114852

[24] SETYAHADI, R. R., & NARSA, I. M. (2020). Corporate Governance and Sustainability in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO12.885

[25] Sharma, A., & Borah, S. B. (2022). Covid-19 and Domestic Violence: an Indirect Path to Social and Economic Crisis. Journal of Family Violence, 37(5), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00188-8

[26] Silva, M., Resurrección, D. M., Antunes, A., Frasquilho, D., & Cardoso, G. (2020). Impact of economic crises on mental health care: a systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000641

[27] Smaili, N., Radu, C., & Khalili, A. (2023). Board effectiveness and cybersecurity disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 27(4), 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09637-6

[28] Valigholizadeh, A., & Karimi, M. (2016). Geographical explanation of the factors disputed in the Karabakh geopolitical crisis. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.07.001

[29] Wang, T., & Yang, B. (2023). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholders’ governance and idiosyncratic risk. Finance Research Letters, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104215

[30] Wattanatorn, W., & Padungsaksawasdi, C. (2022). The board effectiveness index and stock price crash risk. Managerial Finance, 48(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2021-0150

[31] Wijayanti, R., Diyanty, V., & Laela, S. F. (2020). Education strategy misfit, board effectiveness and Indonesian Islamic bank performance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(3), 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2017-0052

[32] Xu, Y., Jia, F., Wang, L., & Chen, L. (2024). Can digital transformation improve firm resilience to supply chain disruption? The role of diversification strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100952

[33] Yacoubian, L. J., & de Carvalho, G. H. F. (2025). Economic Freedom and Foreign Direct Investment: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis. CECCAR Business Review, 2025(9), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.37945/cbr.2025.09.06

[34] Ye, F., Ke, M., Ouyang, Y., Li, Y., Li, L., Zhan, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024). Impact of digital technology usage on firm resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. Supply Chain Management, 29(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2022-0480

[35] Zhao, P., & Zhao, T. (2025, March 1). The relationships between geopolitics and global critical minerals shipping: A literature review. Ocean and Coastal Management. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107559

How to cite this paper

Zakaria Ferdous, Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura, Susmita Saha, Mitun Roy "The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 6 Issue 11 2023 Page 1050-1062 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692
Zakaria Ferdous, Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura, Susmita Saha, Mitun Roy "The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 11, May. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692
Zakaria Ferdous, Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura, Susmita Saha, Mitun Roy (2023). The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 6(11). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692
Zakaria Ferdous, Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura, Susmita Saha, Mitun Roy "The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 11, May. 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692
@article{1714692,
      author = {Zakaria Ferdous, Kaniz FatemaTuz Zahura, Susmita Saha, Mitun Roy},
      title = {The Role of Corporate Governance in Enhancing Firm Resilience During Economic and Geopolitical Crises},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {11},
      pages = {1050-1062},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714692.pdf},
      abstract = {The economic and geopolitical crises have become more systemic, causing disruptions that threaten the strategic sustainability, operational stability, and long-term survival of firms. This paper analyzes how corporate governance is a key tool in enhancing the resilience of firms in volatile environments. It defines resilience as a dynamic ability that is determined by governance systems, board efficiency, risk management practices, technological flexibility, and stakeholder-focused decision-making. The analysis combines the findings of the modern literature on the effects of crisis, digital transformation, supply chain disruption, strategic risk management, and stakeholder governance to substantiate how governance processes enhance the capacity of firms to predict shocks, absorb disruption, and rebound from adverse conditions. The article maintains that good governance leads to resilience in a variety of ways: strengthening strategic control and accountability, facilitating an informed and timely response in case of crisis, creating innovations and technological responsiveness, and aligning corporate response with larger stakeholder and sustainability expectations. It also points to the variability in governance response to economic and geopolitical crisis situations, and institutional and sectoral situations. The article builds on the knowledge of the role of corporate governance as not a simple compliance or structuring scheme, but a strategic and organizational resilience provider during times of deep uncertainty through the development of an integrative conceptual lens. The discussion also provides practical implications for boards, regulators, and other policymakers who aim to enhance the governance structure that can help create resilient and crisis-ready organizations.},
      keywords = {Corporate Governance, Firm Resilience, Economic Crises, Geopolitical Crises, Board Effectiveness, Risk Management and Oversight, Stakeholder Governance},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I11-1714692}
  }