Internal Party Conflict and Democratic Governance in Nigeria, 2015–2022

References

[1] Agbesa, P. O., & Kieh, G. K. (2014). The state in Africa: Beyond the false starts. Third World Publishers.

[2] Ake, C. (1996). Is Africa democratizing? Malthouse Press.

[3] Atelhe, G. A., Abdullahi, M. C., & Alagh, T. (2019). Democracy, intra-party struggle and good governance in Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 154(4), 491-498.

[4] Council of Europe. (2022). Working with the Council of Europe: A practical guide for civil society.

[5] Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.

[6] Dike, E., & Madubueze, M. (2018). Internal party democracy and democratic consolidation in Nigeria. NG-Journal of Social Development, 7(1), 111-117.

[7] Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 369-384.

[8] Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Prentice Hall.

[9] IFES. (2015). Nigeria election results report.

[10] IFES. (2019). Nigeria general election report.

[11] INEC. (2022). Electoral Act 2022. Independent National Electoral Commission.

[12] Iroanusi, O. (2019). APC's loss of Zamfara state. Premium Times.

[13] Jinadu, A. (2011). Inter-party dialogue in Nigeria. Vanguard Newspaper.

[14] Joseph, R. (1991). Democracy and prebendal politics in Nigeria. Cambridge University Press.

[15] Kura, S. Y. (2011). Political parties and democracy in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 13(6), 268-298.

[16] Maiyo, J. (2009). Political parties and democratic development. African Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 45-60.

[17] Mbah, P. (2011). Party defections and democratic consolidation in Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 123(3), 491-498.

[18] Nnadozie, U. (2005). History of political parties in Nigeria. Enugu Press.

[19] Okoli, A. C. (2001). The political economy of intra-party opposition in Nigeria. Nnamdi Azikiwe University.

[20] Okoli, A. C., & Orinya, S. (2014). Political opportunism and crisis of governance in Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 3(7), 1477-1487.

[21] Randull, V., & Svasand, L. (1999). Party institutionalization and democratic development. Party Politics, 5(2), 231-245.

[22] Shale, V., & Matlosa, K. (2008). Managing intra-party and inter-party conflicts. UNDP.

[23] Umar, M. Z., & Kura, S. Y. (2004). Political parties and democratic governance in Nigeria. University Press.

[24] UNMIT. (2012). Democratic governance. United Nations Mission in Timor-Leste.

@article{1714993,
      author = {Jim Asonnam (Ph.D)},
      title = {Internal Party Conflict and Democratic Governance in Nigeria, 2015–2022},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {9},
      pages = {255-258},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714993.pdf},
      abstract = {Political parties play a central role in democratic governance by serving as vehicles for political participation, leadership recruitment, and policy articulation. However, the functioning of political parties in Nigeria has been characterized by persistent internal conflicts that undermine party cohesion and democratic governance. This study examines the impact of internal party conflict on democratic governance in Nigeria between 2015 and 2022. The study adopts David Easton's systems theory as its analytical framework and employs an ex-post facto research design using qualitative methods. Data were obtained from secondary sources such as academic journals, books, newspapers, and official electoral reports, while participant observation served as a supplementary source of primary information. Findings reveal that the absence of internal party democracy, political opportunism, and leadership struggles are major drivers of internal party conflict in Nigeria’s major political parties, particularly the People's Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC). The study further reveals that such conflicts weaken political institutions, distort governance processes, drain state resources, and undermine democratic consolidation. The paper concludes that strengthening internal party democracy and institutional discipline within political parties is essential for sustaining democratic governance in Nigeria. It recommends returning decision-making authority to party members, promoting internal discipline, and reducing judicial interference in party affairs.},
      keywords = {Political Party, Internal Party Conflict, Democratic Governance, Nigeria, Political Opportunism},
      month = {March},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I9-1714993}
  }