Excellence in Public Service Delivery

References

[1] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.

[2] ISO. ISO 23592:2021 Service excellence — Principles and model. International Organization for Standardization. 2021.

[3] ISO. ISO/TS 23686:2022 Service excellence — Measurement of public service excellence — Principles and model for public service organizations. International Organization for Standardization. 2022.

[4] Osborne SP, et al. Value creation in the public service ecosystem: an integrative framework. Public Administration Review. 2022. doi:10.1111/puar.13474.

[5] Cui T, et al. Conceptualizing the elements of value in public services. Public Management Review. 2023. doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2226676.

[6] Virtanen P, et al. Public value creation mechanisms in the context of politics: an integrated conceptual framework. Public Management Review. 2024. doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2268111.

[7] OECD. Serving Citizens: Measuring the Performance of Services in OECD Countries. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2022.

[8] OECD. An updated OECD framework on drivers of trust in public institutions to meet current and future challenges. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2021.

[9] OECD. Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy. OECD Publishing. 2022.

[10] Latupeirissa JJP, et al. Transforming public service delivery: a comprehensive review of digital transformation projects and their effects on local governments. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2818. doi:10.3390/su16072818.

[11] Haug N, et al. Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a review and research agenda. Public Management Review. 2024. doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917.

[12] Asmawanti-S D, et al. Literature review of government digital services based on public value theory and citizen perspectives. Cogent Social Sciences. 2025. doi:10.1080/23311975.2025.2518494.

[13] OECD. Innovative Capacity of Governments: A Systemic Framework. OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. 2022.

[14] Selten F, et al. Managing algorithms for public value. Government Information Quarterly. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.

[15] Damschroder LJ, et al. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0). Implementation Science. 2022. doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.

[16] Buyannemekh B, et al. Understanding value of digital service delivery by governments: evidence from a national survey. Government Information Quarterly. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101935.

[17] Das-Doyle C, Tõnurist P. The state of play and prospects for measuring innovation in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2023. doi:10.1787/dca76af0-en.

[18] Alves JN, et al. Digital Public Service Quality (PS-DigQual): a multidimensional framework. Digital Government: Research and Practice / DGO Proceedings. 2025.

[19] Systematic literature review of lean management in local government organisations. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2024;16(1):1–28.

[20] Aljuwaied M, et al. Lean thinking and resource efficiency in the design of public services. Results in Engineering. 2024; (article).

[21] Bos H, et al. After the initial start of co-production: a narrative review of shifts in co-production orientation. Sustainability. 2025;17(3):971. doi:10.3390/su17030971.

[22] Wang H, et al. Co-production during crises: a strategy to mitigate crisis impacts. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 2025. doi:10.1080/10967494.2025.2479045.

[23] Public value management in digital transformation: a scoping review. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2024;37(7):845–868.

[24] Abuzanjal A, et al. Service innovation challenges in government entities: evidence from UAE. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024;9:100158.

[25] OECD. Global Trends in Government Innovation 2023. OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. 2023.

[26] OECD. Insights from the 2021 OECD Trust Survey. Public Administration Review / Sage. 2024.

[27] Benlahcene A, et al. Citizens’ e-participation through e-government services: a review. Cogent Social Sciences. 2024. doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2415526.

[28] McCulloch C, et al. Innovative capacity of governments: a systemic framework (report). OECD. 2022.

[29] Elder H, et al. Using the EPIS framework to describe implementation in public health agencies. Implementation Science Communications. 2023.

[30] OECD. AI in public service design and delivery: Governing with artificial intelligence (report chapter). OECD. 2025.

@article{1715216,
      author = {Suhail Adel Abdo Sarhan},
      title = {Excellence in Public Service Delivery},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {9},
      pages = {1298-1308},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1715216.pdf},
      abstract = {The concept of excellence in public service delivery has moved from a focus on speed and cost, as exclusive measures of public service delivery, to a broader and all-encompassing concept that includes the capacity for co-creating public value, trust, and managing volatility. From 2020 to 2025, the state has experienced a series of shocks and increased demands for digital-first, inclusive, and transparent public service delivery. During the period, research has been conducted in the following areas that are related and integral to each other, namely, public value and ecosystem thinking that redefines public value beyond customer satisfaction; service excellence and quality management that articulates principles, models, and measurement systems; digital transformation and algorithmic governance that reshape the channel and processes of public service delivery; and operational excellence, co-production, and innovation capacity that translate strategy into sustained performance. This paper synthesizes the research evidence of the last five years and develops an integrative framework of public service excellence that is applicable for public services that experience the logistics of public service delivery, such as transport, border control, urban permitting, and regulatory interactions. Using the PRISMA 2020 reporting guideline as an outlining framework for the systematic review process [1], this paper establishes a mapping of the evidence on how public service excellence is achieved in public service design and measurement and governance. The synthesis of the evidence indicates that public services that achieve public service excellence always involve the design of the citizen’s journey and public service delivery discipline (Lean and standard work), measurement of public service performance within the logic of public service to serve citizens that balances access, responsiveness, and quality [7], and understanding trust as an output of reliability, fairness, and integrity and openness [8, 9]. Digital channels for public value increase with public service quality and the reliability of information provided. Digital channels are seen to increase inequalities among citizens due to digital divide and the opaqueness of algorithms used [10–12]. A blueprint for public service excellence maturity is proposed to link public service excellence standards [2, 3] to innovation capacity [13] and algorithmic governance of public value [14].},
      keywords = {Public Service Delivery; Service Excellence; Public Value; Citizen Experience; Digital Government; Co‑Production; Lean; Innovation Capacity; Trust; Governance.},
      month = {March},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I9-1715216}
  }