Home / Current Issue / Paper 1715315
Hydrostatic Load Response Analysis of A Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Water Tank
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Hydrostatic Analysis of RC Water Tanks
Abstract
Water storage structures play a vital role in municipal, industrial, and domestic water supply systems. The present project focuses on the analysis and design of a rectangular reinforced cement concrete (RCC) water tank using STAAD Pro software, in accordance with relevant Indian Standard codes such as IS 3370 and IS 456:2000. The study emphasizes the structural behavior of a ground-resting rectangular tank subjected to hydrostatic water pressure, soil pressure, self-weight, and other loading conditions.The design methodology incorporates both theoretical calculations and computer-based structural analysis to evaluate bending moments, shear forces, stresses, and deflections. A three-dimensional finite element model of the tank was developed in STAAD Pro, and results obtained from software analysis were compared with manual design procedures to ensure accuracy and safety. The tank dimensions considered are 12 m × 4 m × 2.5 m with a wall thickness of 400 mm. The study concludes that limit state method provides an economical and efficient design compared to the working stress method. The integration of software tools significantly reduces computational effort and improves design reliability, ensuring structural safety and serviceability of the water tank.
Keywords
Rectangular Water Tank, RCC Design, STAAD Pro, IS 3370, Hydrostatic Pressure, Finite Element Analysis, Limit State Method, Liquid Retaining Structures.
References
[1] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000 – Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, New Delhi, India, 2000.
[2] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 3370 (Part I–IV):2009 – Concrete Structures for Storage of Liquids – Code of Practice, New Delhi, India, 2009.
[3] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875 (Part 1–5):1987 – Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures, New Delhi, India, 1987.
[4] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1893 (Part 2):2014 – Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures – Liquid Retaining Tanks, New Delhi, India, 2014.
[5] P. Dayaratnam, Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing, 2000.
[6] V. N. Vazirani and M. M. Ratwani, Concrete Structures, New Delhi, India: Khanna Publishers, 1990.
[7] R. K. Bansal, Theory of Structures, New Delhi, India: Laxmi Publications, 2005.
[8] S. U. Pillai and D. Menon, Reinforced Concrete Design, New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill Education, 2012.
[9] N. Krishna Raju, Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design, New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers, 2010.
[10] M. L. Gambhir, Reinforced Concrete Design, New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India, 2008.
[11] R. Hulse and B. Mosley, Reinforced Concrete Design, London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
[12] B. C. Punmia, A. K. Jain, and A. K. Jain, RCC Designs, New Delhi, India: Laxmi Publications, 2009.
[13] M. Bhandari and K. D. Singh, “Economic design of water tank of different shapes with reference to IS 3370-2009,” Int. J. Modern Eng. Res., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1–6, Dec. 2014.
[14] R. S. Lodhi, A. Sharma, and V. Garg, “Design of Intze tank in perspective of revision of IS 3370,” Int. J. Scientific Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1193–1197, Sept. 2014.
[15] N. K. Meshram and P. S. Pajgade, “Comparative study of water tank using limit state method and working stress method,” Int. J. Res. Advent Technol., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 45–50, Aug. 2014.
[16] A. Wad, N. G. Gore, P. J. Salunke, and V. G. Sayagavi, “Cost optimization of rectangular RCC underground tank,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 85–89, July 2014.
[17] M. N. Gandhi and A. Rajan, “Necessity of dynamic analysis of elevated water storage structure using different bracing,” Int. J. Res. Advent Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 100–105, Feb. 2014.
[18] R. Sameer, A. R. Mundhada, and S. Metkar, “Comparison of RCC and prestressed concrete circular water tanks,” Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 120–125, Dec. 2012.
[19] C. N. Patel and H. S. Patel, “Optimum diameter of tapered elevated RC water tank staging,” Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 98–104, Dec. 2012.
[20] R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 8th ed., Boston, MA, USA: Pearson Education, 2012.
[21] Bentley Systems, STAAD.Pro V8i Technical Reference Manual, Exton, PA, USA: Bentley Systems Inc., 2016.
[22] C. K. Wang and C. G. Salmon, Reinforced Concrete Design, 6th ed., New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 2007.
[23] J. G. MacGregor and J. K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, 2012.
[24] B. Mosley, J. Bungey, and R. Hulse, Reinforced Concrete Design to Eurocode 2, London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
[25] A. M. Neville and J. J. Brooks, Concrete Technology, 2nd ed., London, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2010.
How to cite this paper
@article{1715315,
author = {G. Sai Shruthi, R Sannidhi, N Sai Vinayak, B Lokesh Babu, M Manikanta; P Lingam},
title = {Hydrostatic Load Response Analysis of A Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Water Tank},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {9},
pages = {1411-1416},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1715315.pdf},
abstract = {Water storage structures play a vital role in municipal, industrial, and domestic water supply systems. The present project focuses on the analysis and design of a rectangular reinforced cement concrete (RCC) water tank using STAAD Pro software, in accordance with relevant Indian Standard codes such as IS 3370 and IS 456:2000. The study emphasizes the structural behavior of a ground-resting rectangular tank subjected to hydrostatic water pressure, soil pressure, self-weight, and other loading conditions.The design methodology incorporates both theoretical calculations and computer-based structural analysis to evaluate bending moments, shear forces, stresses, and deflections. A three-dimensional finite element model of the tank was developed in STAAD Pro, and results obtained from software analysis were compared with manual design procedures to ensure accuracy and safety. The tank dimensions considered are 12 m × 4 m × 2.5 m with a wall thickness of 400 mm. The study concludes that limit state method provides an economical and efficient design compared to the working stress method. The integration of software tools significantly reduces computational effort and improves design reliability, ensuring structural safety and serviceability of the water tank.},
keywords = {Rectangular Water Tank, RCC Design, STAAD Pro, IS 3370, Hydrostatic Pressure, Finite Element Analysis, Limit State Method, Liquid Retaining Structures.},
month = {March},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I9-1715315}
}