Home / Current Issue / Paper 1715747
The Engineer’s Compass: Navigating Complexities in Plant Management
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Plant Management
Abstract
Industrial plants are complicated socio-technical systems where managers have to make tradeoffs between efficiency, reliability, safety and innovation in a state of uncertainty. Although the world is becoming more complex due to globalisation and digitalisation, there is no much integrative guidance on how engineers can manoeuvre these requirements. The paper proposes the Engineering Compass Model (ECM) conceptual framework, which places plant management as a multi-directional decision-making process in four orientations, namely, operational reliability, risk and safety governance, human and organisational coordination, and adaptive innovation. Using the knowledge of operations management, industrial engineering, organisational theory, and engineering ethics, the research identifies the significance of engineers as technical-organisational systems integrators. Finally, the paper outlines managerial implications of operational resilience and digital transformation and suggests a roadmap to empirical validation.
Keywords
plant management, engineering leadership, operational reliability, safety governance, Industry 4.0, socio-technical systems, engineering decision-making, dynamic capabilities, adaptive innovation
References
[1] Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020). Predictive maintenance in the 4th industrial revolution: Benefits, business opportunities, and managerial implications. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2958037
[2] Daradkeh, M. (2023). Navigating the complexity of entrepreneurial ethics: A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15(14), 11099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411099
[3] Dekker, S. (2017). Just culture: Restoring trust and accountability in your organization (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
[4] Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004
[5] Hollnagel, E. (2018). Safety-II in practice: Developing the resilience potentials. Routledge.
[6] Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
[7] Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
[8] Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576
[9] Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
[10] Tortorella, G. L., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975–2987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420
How to cite this paper
@article{1715747,
author = {Adejumo Oladele},
title = {The Engineer’s Compass: Navigating Complexities in Plant Management},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {9},
pages = {2978-2986},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1715747.pdf},
abstract = {Industrial plants are complicated socio-technical systems where managers have to make tradeoffs between efficiency, reliability, safety and innovation in a state of uncertainty. Although the world is becoming more complex due to globalisation and digitalisation, there is no much integrative guidance on how engineers can manoeuvre these requirements. The paper proposes the Engineering Compass Model (ECM) conceptual framework, which places plant management as a multi-directional decision-making process in four orientations, namely, operational reliability, risk and safety governance, human and organisational coordination, and adaptive innovation. Using the knowledge of operations management, industrial engineering, organisational theory, and engineering ethics, the research identifies the significance of engineers as technical-organisational systems integrators. Finally, the paper outlines managerial implications of operational resilience and digital transformation and suggests a roadmap to empirical validation.},
keywords = {plant management, engineering leadership, operational reliability, safety governance, Industry 4.0, socio-technical systems, engineering decision-making, dynamic capabilities, adaptive innovation },
month = {March},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I9-1715747}
}