Project-Based Language Teaching in Kenya's Competency-Based Curriculum: Structural Alignment, Implementation Tensions, and a Design Framework

References

[1] Ackers, J., & Hardman, F. (2001). Classroom interaction in Kenyan primary schools. Compare, 31(2), 245–261.

[2] Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

[3] Beckett, G. H. (2002). Teacher and student evaluations of project-based instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 19(2), 52–66.

[4] Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language and content integration. ELT Journal, 59(2), 108–116.

[5] Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.

[6] Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

[7] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

[8] Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

[9] García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.

[10] Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

[11] Jonnaert, P., Masciotra, D., Barrette, J., Morel, D., & Mane, Y. (2007). From competency in the curriculum to competency in action. Prospects, 37(2), 187–203.

[12] Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press.

[13] Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.

[14] Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

[15] Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.

[16] Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.

[17] Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

[18] Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Hogrefe & Huber.

[19] Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261–277.

[20] Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

[21] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

[22] Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Hogrefe & Huber.

[23] Westera, W. (2001). Competences in education: A confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 75–88.

@article{1715988,
      author = {Monicah Onyancha},
      title = {Project-Based Language Teaching in Kenya's Competency-Based Curriculum: Structural Alignment, Implementation Tensions, and a Design Framework},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {689-696},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1715988.pdf},
      abstract = {Kenya's Competency-Based Curriculum articulates ambitious language education goals but provides language teachers with little methodological guidance on how to achieve them. The curriculum demands that learners develop integrated, demonstrable communicative competence through purposeful, collaborative activity — yet the pedagogical approaches available to most Kenyan teachers operate at the level of individual lessons and discrete tasks, which cannot generate the cumulative competency evidence the curriculum's assessment framework requires. This paper argues that project-based language teaching (PBLT) addresses this gap because its organising logic — extended inquiry, collaborative production, embedded assessment, authentic driving questions — corresponds to the curriculum's own structure of learning as a progression toward integrated competence. Drawing on communicative language teaching theory, sociocultural theory, and activity theory, the paper analyses the alignment between PBLT principles and competency-based curriculum design, examines the structural tensions that arise in Kenyan classroom implementation, and proposes the Competency-Anchored PBLT Framework (CA-PBLT) as a practical design tool. The paper concludes that the principal obstacles to PBLT implementation in Kenya are institutional rather than pedagogical, and identifies directions for empirical follow-up research.},
      keywords = {Project-Based Language Teaching, Competency-Based Curriculum, Kenya, Communicative Competence, Language Pedagogy, Curriculum Reform},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1715988}
  }