International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716227

1716227 Vol 9 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030

Ali Kasa

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Corporate Governance Models

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227

Abstract

Leadership succession has become a critical strategic priority for organizations operating within dynamic and transformation-driven economies such as Saudi Arabia. Under the national agenda of Saudi Vision 2030, organizations are required to ensure leadership continuity, governance maturity, and institutional resilience to sustain long-term economic diversification and growth. Despite its importance, succession planning remains insufficiently integrated into corporate governance frameworks, often resulting in leadership gaps, operational disruption, and strategic misalignment. This study develops a comprehensive governance-based framework that embeds leadership succession within board-level oversight, risk governance, and strategic planning processes. Drawing on agency theory, stewardship theory, and resource dependency theory, the research examines how governance structures—particularly board composition, nomination committees, and executive evaluation systems—affect succession effectiveness in Saudi and global enterprises. A qualitative multi-case methodology is adopted to analyze governance practices in transformation-oriented organizations. The study proposes a Strategic Governance–Succession Integration Framework (SGSIF), which aligns leadership development, governance oversight, and risk management to ensure organizational continuity. The findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, boards, and executives seeking to institutionalize succession planning as a core governance function in support of Vision 2030 objectives.

Keywords

Corporate Governance; Leadership Succession; Organizational Continuity; Saudi Vision 2030; Board Effectiveness; Executive Transition; Strategic Governance; Risk Management; Leadership Development; Institutional Resilience

References

[1] Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196772

[2] Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2015). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju042

[3] Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2011). The leadership pipeline: How to build the leadership-powered company. Jossey-Bass.

[4] Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258

[5] Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.

[6] Hafnidah, N. (2025). Leadership succession and its impact on organizational resilience in engineering consulting firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.

[7] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

[8] Jindal, P., & Shaikh, M. (2021). Talent retention as a mediator between talent management and succession planning. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2021.26.2.6

[9] Kipara, K. J. (2026). Assessing the influence of succession planning on long-term organizational sustainability. OPUS HR Journal.

[10] Klugah, G. E. (2025). The mediating role of succession issues in organizational performance. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2551282

[11] Li, Z., Mustapha, M., Hassan, A. F., & Saidin, S. (2024). The influence of corporate governance on succession planning and organizational performance. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2024-0412

[12] Mukhama, S. (2024). Succession planning strategies to ensure leadership continuity. Walden University Dissertations.

[13] OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing.

[14] Shailer, G. (2018). Corporate governance. In Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_155-1

[15] Susilo, S., & Winarto, O. P. (2023). The influence of succession planning on organizational sustainability. Scaffolding Journal, 5(3), 490–518. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i3.3448

[16] Thakur, A. (2022). Succession planning trends in modern organizations. OPUS HR Journal, 13(1), 54.

[17] Ugoani, J. (2020). Management succession planning and organizational sustainability. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6(2), 30–41.

[18] Urassa, G. W. (2024). Implementation of succession planning in local government authorities. University of Dodoma.

[19] Schneider, J., Kuss, P., Abraham, R., & Meske, C. (2024). Governance of generative artificial intelligence for companies. arXiv preprint.

[20] Mirishli, S. (2025). Legal frameworks for ethical AI in corporate governance. arXiv preprint.

[21] Virtus Interpress. (2025). Linkages of talent management and succession planning in corporate organizations. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv21i1art1

[22] Harvard Business Review. (2020). CEO succession and leadership continuity strategies.

[23] PwC. (2022). CEO succession planning report.

[24] McKinsey & Company. (2021). Leadership transitions and organizational performance.

[25] KPMG. (2020). Corporate governance and board effectiveness survey.

[26] Keys to High-Impact Corporate Governance. (2024). Keys to High-Impact Corporate Governance. Business Expert Press.

How to cite this paper

Ali Kasa "Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 1242-1251 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227
Ali Kasa "Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227
Ali Kasa (2026). Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227
Ali Kasa "Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227
@article{1716227,
      author = {Ali Kasa},
      title = {Corporate Governance Models for Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity: A Strategic Framework for Saudi Vision 2030},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {1242-1251},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716227.pdf},
      abstract = {Leadership succession has become a critical strategic priority for organizations operating within dynamic and transformation-driven economies such as Saudi Arabia. Under the national agenda of Saudi Vision 2030, organizations are required to ensure leadership continuity, governance maturity, and institutional resilience to sustain long-term economic diversification and growth. Despite its importance, succession planning remains insufficiently integrated into corporate governance frameworks, often resulting in leadership gaps, operational disruption, and strategic misalignment.
This study develops a comprehensive governance-based framework that embeds leadership succession within board-level oversight, risk governance, and strategic planning processes. Drawing on agency theory, stewardship theory, and resource dependency theory, the research examines how governance structures—particularly board composition, nomination committees, and executive evaluation systems—affect succession effectiveness in Saudi and global enterprises. A qualitative multi-case methodology is adopted to analyze governance practices in transformation-oriented organizations. The study proposes a Strategic Governance–Succession Integration Framework (SGSIF), which aligns leadership development, governance oversight, and risk management to ensure organizational continuity. The findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, boards, and executives seeking to institutionalize succession planning as a core governance function in support of Vision 2030 objectives.
},
      keywords = {Corporate Governance; Leadership Succession; Organizational Continuity; Saudi Vision 2030; Board Effectiveness; Executive Transition; Strategic Governance; Risk Management; Leadership Development; Institutional Resilience},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716227}
  }