Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716228
Enhancing Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity through Corporate Governance: Implications for Saudi Vision 2030 Transformation
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Corporate Governance
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716228
Abstract
Leadership succession is a critical determinant of organizational sustainability, particularly in economies undergoing large-scale transformation such as Saudi Arabia. Within the strategic framework of Saudi Vision 2030, organizations are expected to demonstrate strong governance, institutional resilience, and leadership continuity to support long-term national development objectives. However, succession planning in many organizations remains fragmented and insufficiently integrated into corporate governance structures, leading to leadership gaps, operational disruptions, and strategic misalignment. This study examines the role of corporate governance in enhancing leadership succession and ensuring organizational continuity in transformation-driven environments. Drawing on agency theory, stewardship theory, and resource dependency theory, the research analyzes how governance mechanisms—including board oversight, nomination committees, and leadership development systems—contribute to effective succession planning. A qualitative research approach is employed, utilizing multi-case analysis of global and Saudi-based organizations to identify governance practices that support leadership continuity. The study proposes a governance-driven succession framework that integrates strategic oversight, risk management, and leadership development to strengthen organizational resilience. The findings provide practical implications for policymakers, boards, and executives seeking to align succession planning with governance systems to support sustainable transformation under Vision 2030.
Keywords
Corporate Governance; Leadership Succession; Organizational Continuity; Saudi Vision 2030; Strategic Transformation; Board Governance; Executive Transition; Risk Management; Leadership Development; Institutional Resilience
References
[1] Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196772
[2] Aguilera, R. V., et al. (2025). Toward an updated corporate governance framework in a changing global environment. Business & Society.
[3] Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2015). Inside the family firm: Succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju042
[4] Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2011). The leadership pipeline. Jossey-Bass.
[5] Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
[6] Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership. Oxford University Press.
[7] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
[8] Jindal, P., & Shaikh, M. (2021). Talent retention and succession planning. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2021.26.2.6
[9] Klugah, G. E. (2025). Succession issues and organizational performance. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2551282
[10] Li, Z., Mustapha, M., Hassan, A. F., & Saidin, S. (2024). Corporate governance and succession planning performance. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2024-0412
[11] Qawasmeh, S. J. A. (2022). Succession planning and corporate governance in family firms. DBA Thesis.
[12] Renuka, V. V., & Marath, B. (2023). Governance structure and succession success. Rajagiri Management Journal.
[13] Susilo, S., & Winarto, O. P. (2023). Succession planning and sustainability. Scaffolding Journal, 5(3), 490–518. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i3.3448
[14] Ugoani, J. (2020). Succession planning and organizational sustainability. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6(2), 30–41
[15] Hafnidah, N. (2025). Leadership succession and organizational resilience. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
[16] Kipara, K. J. (2026). Succession planning and long-term sustainability. OPUS HR Journal
[17] Thakur, A. (2022). Modern succession planning trends. OPUS HR Journal
[18] OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing
[19] PwC. (2022). CEO succession planning report. PwC
[20] McKinsey & Company. (2021). Leadership transitions and organizational performance. McKinsey & Company
[21] KPMG. (2020). Corporate governance and board effectiveness survey. KPMG
[22] Harvard Business Review. (2020). CEO succession and leadership continuity strategies
[23] Chigudu, D., et al. (2020). Leadership and governance for organizational sustainability.
[24] Mubarik, M. S., & Kiruja, E. (2017). Succession planning and firm performance. Journal of Leadership and Governance
[25] Ceja, L., et al. (2011). Governance mechanisms and family business succession. Journal of Family Business Strategy
[26] Groysberg, B., & Bell, D. (2014). Governance and leadership transitions. Harvard Business Review
[27] Keys to High-Impact Corporate Governance. (2024). Keys to High-Impact Corporate Governance. Business Expert Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1716228,
author = {Ali Kasa},
title = {Enhancing Leadership Succession and Organizational Continuity through Corporate Governance: Implications for Saudi Vision 2030 Transformation},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {1252-1260},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716228.pdf},
abstract = {Leadership succession is a critical determinant of organizational sustainability, particularly in economies undergoing large-scale transformation such as Saudi Arabia. Within the strategic framework of Saudi Vision 2030, organizations are expected to demonstrate strong governance, institutional resilience, and leadership continuity to support long-term national development objectives. However, succession planning in many organizations remains fragmented and insufficiently integrated into corporate governance structures, leading to leadership gaps, operational disruptions, and strategic misalignment. This study examines the role of corporate governance in enhancing leadership succession and ensuring organizational continuity in transformation-driven environments. Drawing on agency theory, stewardship theory, and resource dependency theory, the research analyzes how governance mechanisms—including board oversight, nomination committees, and leadership development systems—contribute to effective succession planning. A qualitative research approach is employed, utilizing multi-case analysis of global and Saudi-based organizations to identify governance practices that support leadership continuity. The study proposes a governance-driven succession framework that integrates strategic oversight, risk management, and leadership development to strengthen organizational resilience. The findings provide practical implications for policymakers, boards, and executives seeking to align succession planning with governance systems to support sustainable transformation under Vision 2030.},
keywords = {Corporate Governance; Leadership Succession; Organizational Continuity; Saudi Vision 2030; Strategic Transformation; Board Governance; Executive Transition; Risk Management; Leadership Development; Institutional Resilience},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716228}
}