Systemic Review of Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)

References

[1] Aguila-Obra, & Padilla. (2006). Organizational factors affecting technology adoption. Internet Research, 16(1), 94-110.

[2] Anis, Rahman, Alam, Nabil, & Hasan. (2014). Development of electronic voting machine with the inclusion of near field communication id cards, biometric fingerprint sensor, and pos printer. School of Engineering and Computer Science BRACU, 1-33.

[3] Aurora. (2009, July 18). Global Research: United State Voting Procedures. Retrieved from Thewe: http://www.thewe.cc/contents/more/archive/united_states_voting_procedures.html

[4] Ayeni, & Esan. (2018). The impact of ICT in the conduct of elections in Nigeria. Am J Compt Sci Inform Technol 6(1), 23-36.

[5] Ayo, Adebiyi, & Sofoluwe. (2012, May 8). E-Voting Implementation in Nigeria: The Success Factors. Retrieved from ePrint: Covenant University: http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/id/eprint/873

[6] Delaune, Kremer, & Ryan. (2010). Verifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols: A taster. Unpublished paper. School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, 1-43.

[7] Ducklin. (2018, July 29). 20 years ago today! What we can learn from the CIH virus. Retrieved from Naked Security: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/04/26/20-years-ago-today-what-we-can-learn-from-the-cih-virus/

[8] Esan, & Ayeni. (2007). E-voting in Nigeria: Barriers to full implementation. Journal of Computing Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 1-21.

[9] Gibson, Krimmer, Teague, & Pomares. (2016). A review of E-voting: the past, present, and future. Annals of Telecommunications, 23(11), 279-286.

[10] Infante, Rancer, & Womack. (1997). Building communication theory. Prospect Heights, III: Waveland Press, 17-22.

[11] Kalaichelvi, & Chandrasekaran. (2011). Design and analysis of the secured electronic voting protocol. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology,34(2), 23-46.

[12] Lipton, Sanger, & Shane. (2016, March 23). The perfect weapon: How Russian cyber power Invaded the U.S. Retrieved from NY Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/pol itics/ -hack-election-dnc.html

[13] Naveenraj, Arun, Gowtham, Laleth, Naveen, & Kumar. (2019). The biometric-based electronic voting system using Aadhar. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(65), 196-199.

[14] Norman. (2002). The psychology of everyday things, 2nd Edition. Illinois, USA: Northbrook.

[15] Ojo, & Ihemeje. (2019). Designing e-voting as an apparatus for combating election rigging: A Nigerian Model. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(3), 1–21.

[16] RifkiSuwandi, & Nasution. (2016). Okamoto-Uchiyama homomorphic encryption algorithm implementation in the E-voting system in IEEE Trans. International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) (pp. 2–16). Glassglow UK: IEEE.

[17] Sabo, Siti, Abdullah, & Rozita. (2015). Issue and challenges of the transition to e-voting technology in Nigeria. Journal of public policy and administration research, 5(4), 23–56.

[18] Sinha, & Singh. (2015). Securing mobile phone-based voting by integrating location services with an encryption algorithm . International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 23(1), 23-56.

[19] Uzedhe, & Okhaifoh. (2016). A technological framework for transparent E-voting solution In the Nigerian electoral system. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 35(3), 627–636.

[20] Van, Freeman, Van, Mitchell, James, Galvao, . . . Spiegelhalter. (2019). Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers, and science. Soc. open sci.6(1), 81-87.

[21] Wayne. (2019, November 1). Diffusion of innovation theory. Retrieved from SPHWEB: https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/SB/BehavioralChangeTheories/Behav ioralChangeTheories4.html

@article{1716273,
      author = {Ashibuogwu Kevin, Esomu Solomon, Danny Oriaran},
      title = {Systemic Review of Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {1381-1392},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716273.pdf},
      abstract = {The ever-evolving landscape of digital communications has sporadically interconnected people in various corners of the earth, ensuring optimal delivery of information. This rise in networking also led to increasing threats on network intrusion; leading to security incidents, data leaks, phishing attacks, etc. Thus, there is a need for intrusion detection and preventive systems to be actively deployed on networks for safe utilization of the numerous advantages of network systems. Intrusion detection systems when deployed actively monitors all incoming and outgoing network activities, scanning for improper network anomalies and when incongruities are detected, it sends alarms to network administrators. This type of intrusion system acts more like a passive monitoring system. An Intrusion Preventive System on the other hand, functions more as an Intrusion Detection System; however, with the added advantage that it prevents such anomalies from occurring in the first instance. This study gives an in-depth review of Intrusion Prevention Systems, detailing their various operations and how they can be deployed on active networks. },
      keywords = {Intrusion Prevention System; Systemic Review; Network Security},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716273}
  }