Feed Form and Feed Source Effects on Growth and Laying Performance, Egg Quality, and Follicular Variables in Layer Chickens

References

[1] Abdollahi, M. R., Ravindran, V., & Svihus, B. (2013). Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 179(1–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.10.014

[2] Abdollahi, M. R., Ravindran, V., & Svihus, B. (2019). Physical processing of feed in relation to gastrointestinal tract development, gut health and performance of poultry. In Improving Gut Health in Poultry (pp. 31–57). Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.

[3] Adebiyi, O. A., Makinde, O. A., & Ironkwe, M. O. (2019). Effect of feed form and dietary nutrient density on performance of commercial layers in a tropical environment. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28(2), 342–350.

[4] Agunbiade, J. A., Adeyemi, O. A., Ashiru, O. M., Awojobi, H. A., Taiwo, A. A., Oke, D. B., & Adekunmisi, A. A. (2020). Replacement of fishmeal with maggot meal in cassava-based layers’ diets. Journal of Poultry Science, 44(3), 278–283.

[5] Ajayi, F. O., Bamidele, O., Hassan, W. A., Ogundu, U., Yakubu, A., Alabi, O. O., Akinsola, O. M., Sonaiya, E. B., & Adebambo, O. A. (2020). Production performance and survivability of six dual-purpose breeds of chicken under smallholder farmers’ management practices in Nigeria. Archives Animal Breeding, 63(2), 387–408.

[6] Alabi, O. O., Ajayi, F. O., Bamidele, O., Yakubu, A., Ogundu, E. U., Sonaiya, E. B., Ojo, M. A., Hassan, W. A., & Adebambo, O. A. (2020). Impact assessment of improved chicken genetics on livelihoods and food security of smallholder poultry farmers in Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32(5), 77.

[7] AOAC International. (2016). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (20th ed.). AOAC International.

[8] Gao, Z., Zhang, J., Li, F., Zheng, J., & Xu, G. (2021). Effect of oils in feed on the production performance and egg quality of laying hens. Animals, 11(12), 3482.

[9] Hartcher, K. M., & Jones, B. (2017). The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 73(4), 767–782.

[10] Haugh, R. R. (1937). The Haugh Unit for Measuring Egg Quality. The US Egg and Poultry Magazine, 45, 552–555, 572–573.

[11] Jafar-Nejad, S., Farhangi, M., Omrani, F., & Sharifi, S. D. (2021). Effect of feed form and nutrient density on growth performance, blood parameters, and intestinal traits in broiler breeder pullets. Poultry Science, 100(9), 101327.

[12] Johnson, A. L. (2015). Reproduction in the female. In C. G. Scanes (Ed.), Sturkie’s Avian Physiology (6th ed., pp. 635–665). Academic Press.

[13] Kiarie, E. G., & Mills, A. (2019). Role of feed processing on gut health and function in pigs and poultry: Conundrum of optimal particle size and hydrothermal regimens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 19.

[14] Kim, C. H., & Kang, H. K. (2022). Effects of energy and protein levels on laying performance, egg quality, blood parameters, blood biochemistry, and apparent total tract digestibility on laying hens in an aviary system. Animals, 12(24), 3513.

[15] Koçer, B., Bozkurt, M., Küçükyılmaz, K., Ege, G., Akşit, H., Orojpour, A., Topbaş, S., Tüzün, A. E., Bintaş, E., & Seyrek, K. (2016). Effects of particle sizes and physical form of the diet on performance, egg quality and size of the digestive organs in laying hens. European Poultry Science, 80.

[16] National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry (9th rev. ed.). National Academy Press.

[17] National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCI) (2017). Meteorological Station, NRCI, Umudike.

[18] Nworgu, F. C., & Ogungbenro, S. A. (2017). Assessment of the performance of layer chickens and economic evaluation of commercial versus farm-formulated feeds in humid tropics of Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 16(4), 147–154.

[19] Ogundeji, A. B., Osanyinlusi, O., & Adeoti, A. (2024). Feed cost optimisation of table egg production in Nigeria. Malaysian Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 1–15.

[20] Oso, A. O., Awoniyi, A. T., & Sobayo, R. A. (2019). Effect of pellet versus mash diets on performance, blood chemistry, and organ morphology of laying hens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51(5), 1137–1145.

[21] Park, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., & Choi, Y. (2025). Effects of feed form on eggshell quality and calcium metabolism in commercial laying hens. Poultry Science, 104(1), 103415.

[22] Renema, R. A., Robinson, F. E., & Zuidhof, M. J. (2018). Reproductive efficiency and metabolism of female broiler breeders as affected by genotype, feed allocation, and age at photostimulation. Poultry Science, 78(4), 479–491.

[23] Ricke, S. C., Dittoe, D. K., & Richardson, K. E. (2022). Application of microbial analyses to feeds and potential implications for poultry nutrition. Poultry Science, 101(5), 101784.

[24] Thomas, M., van Vliet, T., & van der Poel, A. F. B. (2018). Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 3. Contribution of feedstuff components. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 70(1–2), 59–78.

[25] Wan, Y., Ma, R., Khalid, A., Chai, L., Qi, R., Liu, W., Li, J., Li, Y., & Zhan, K. (2021). Effect of the pellet and mash feed forms on the productive performance, egg quality, nutrient metabolism, and intestinal morphology of two laying hen breeds. Animals, 11(3), 701.

[26] Yenice, G., Kaynar, O., Ileriturk, M., Hira, F., & Hayirli, A. (2025). Feed form and its effects on shell quality, nutrient utilization, and laying performance across the production cycle. Poultry Science, 104(3), 103621.

[27] You, J., Ellis, J. L., Tulpan, D., & Malpass, M. C. (2024). Recent advances and future technologies in poultry feed manufacturing. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 80(3), 643–655.

[28] Yunitasari, F., Jayanegara, A., & Ulupi, N. (2023). Performance, egg quality, and immunity of laying hens due to natural carotenoid supplementation: A meta-analysis. Food Science of Animal Resources, 43(2), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e76

[29] Zinn, R. A. (2004). A guide to feed mixing. University of California, Davis, Department of Animal Science.

@article{1716391,
      author = {Dr. Okafor, B. B., Prof. Ogbu, C. C., Prof. Udeh, N. E.},
      title = {Feed Form and Feed Source Effects on Growth and Laying Performance, Egg Quality, and Follicular Variables in Layer Chickens},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {2346-2358},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716391.pdf},
      abstract = {Feed form and source could influence feeding behaviour, feed intake, nutrient bioavailability, and productive performance of laying hens. This 40 weeks study evaluated the effects of feed form and feed source on production performance, egg quality traits, and follicular variables in layer chicks. Ninety day-old Isa Brown layer chicks were allocated to three dietary treatments in a completely randomized design namely, commercial pellet (CP), commercial mash (CM), and farm-mixed mash (FMM). Each treatment had three replicates of 10 chicks each. Data on growth and laying performance, egg quality, follicle type, number, and weight were analyzed using the independent samples t-test. Results showed that pellet-fed chicks had significantly higher hen-day egg production (HDEP) at weeks 17–20, 29–32, 33–36, and 37–40 (p ≤ 0.05), and greater egg weight in the later production phase. Pellet feed consistently supported superior Haugh unit scores, and albumen, and yolk heights. On the other hand, chicks fed farm-mixed mash experienced a late-cycle egg production decline (42.07 ± 1.21% HDEP at weeks 37–40 versus 72.15 ± 1.31% for chicks fed commercial mash; p < 0.001), which was also associated with a diminished pre-hierarchical follicle pool. It is concluded that pellet feed confers significant commercial advantages in laying performance and internal egg quality. While farm-mixed rations may offer some cost-benefits during rearing, this advantage may be eroded by late phase egg production decline. Farm mixing of feed for laying hens may therefore, be disadvantageous in the long run in layer programmes unless nutrition precision, quality, and adequacy is consistently maintained throughout the rearing and laying phase.},
      keywords = {Egg Quality, Feed Form, Feed Source, Follicular Variables, Layer Chickens, Production Performance.},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716391}
  }