Misuse Of Criminal Law in India: A Comprehensive Study on IPC and BNS

References

[1] Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273.

[2] Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels, (2012) 5 SCC 661.

[3] Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684.

[4] D.K. Basu v. State of W.B., (1997) 1 SCC 416.

[5] Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303.

[6] Inder Chand Bagri v. State, SC (2025).

[7] Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 189.

[8] Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955.

[9] Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP, (2014) 2 SCC 1.

[10] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.

[11] Paramjeet Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, SC (2025).

[12] Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India, (2020) 4 SCC 727.

[13] Prakash Singh v. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 1.

[14] Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP, (2017) 8 SCC 821.

[15] S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India, (2022) SCC OnLine SC 900.

[16] Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694.

[17] State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335.

[18] Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra, (2018) 6 SCC 454.

[19] Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221.

[20] Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, (2005) 6 SCC 281.

[21] T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala, (2001) 6 SCC 181.

[22] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023 (effective 1 July 2024).

[23] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023.

[24] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, No. 47 of 2023.

[25] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

[26] Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

[27] Indian Penal Code, No. 45 of 1860.

[28] Information Technology Act, 2000.

[29] Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

[30] Bureau of Police Research and Development, Handbook on Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (2024).

[31] Law Commission of India, 243rd Report on Section 498A IPC (2012).

[32] Ministry of Home Affairs, New Criminal Laws Implementation Status (2026).

[33] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India Report 2024 (2025).

[34] National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India 2024 (2025).

[35] National Judicial Data Grid, https://njdg.ecourts.gov.in (last visited March 2026).

[36] Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs, 229th Report on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (November 2023).

[37] Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), Report on Criminalization of Civil Disputes (2024).

[38] J.D.M. Derrett, Religion, Law and the State in India (Faber & Faber, 1968).

[39] K.D. Gaur, Criminal Law: Cases and Materials (8th ed., 2024).

[40] P.S.A. Pillai, Criminal Law (15th ed., 2025).

[41] Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code (36th ed., 2023).

[42] R.V. Kelkar, Criminal Procedure (9th ed., 2023).

[43] S.N. Misra, Indian Penal Code (22nd ed., 2025).

[44] Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Criminal Law Reforms Critique (2025).

[45] World Bank, Ease of Doing Business India Report (2023).

[46] The Hindu, “BNS Implementation Challenges in UP Courts” (February 2026).

[47] Indian Express, “Police Reforms and BNS Critique” (December 2025).

[48] Times of India, “498A Misuse Patterns Post-BNS” (January 2026).

@article{1716466,
      author = {Anushree, Dr. Taru Mishra},
      title = {Misuse Of Criminal Law in India: A Comprehensive Study on IPC and BNS},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {2150-2157},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716466.pdf},
      abstract = {The misuse of criminal law in India stands as one of the most pressing challenges confronting the nation’s legal order, manifesting as the deliberate weaponisation of penal provisions under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and its successor, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), to advance personal vendettas, political agendas, and economic coercion rather than to vindicate genuine public wrongs. This paper undertakes a comprehensive doctrinal analysis of the principal forms of criminal law misuse, examining key provisions such as Sections 420, 498A, 153A, and 124A of the IPC alongside their BNS counterparts, with reference to landmark judicial decisions including Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, and Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP. The study traces the colonial origins of over-criminalisation through Lord Macaulay’s Indian Penal Code, evaluates the BNS reforms and their structural limitations, and assesses the socio-economic, constitutional, and institutional consequences of systemic misuse. The research identifies critical gaps in verification mechanisms, forensic infrastructure, and police accountability, and advances targeted recommendations for legislative, judicial, and administrative reform. The paper concludes that while the BNS offers meaningful procedural improvements, genuine transformation requires coordinated effort across legislative drafting, police culture, and judicial oversight to preserve the criminal justice system’s foundational legitimacy.},
      keywords = {Misuse of Criminal Law; Indian Penal Code; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Over-Criminalisation; Section 498A; Sedition; False FIRs; Judicial Safeguards; Police Reforms; Constitutional Rights.},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716466}
  }