A Doctrinal Study of Trademark Infringement in India’s Keyword Economy
  • Author(s): Poonam Sharma
  • Paper ID: 1716471
  • Page: 1937-1940
  • Published Date: 20-04-2026
  • Published In: Iconic Research And Engineering Journals
  • Publisher: IRE Journals
  • e-ISSN: 2456-8880
  • Volume/Issue: Volume 9 Issue 10 April-2026
Abstract

This paper examines how keyword advertising has unsettled established trademark law in India, and what courts have done about it. Search engine marketing now sits at the centre of digital commerce, but the legal concepts designed to govern trademark use — particularly "commercial use" and "likelihood of confusion" — were not built with invisible algorithmic triggers in mind. The study traces the shift in Indian jurisprudence from the rigid, visibility-driven approach in Consim Info to the functional approach established in Google v. DRS Logistics. Drawing on Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the safe harbour provisions under Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000, it identifies a clear judicial movement toward the "informed user" standard. The paper ends by proposing a regulatory approach that gives trademark owners meaningful protection without closing the keyword market to fair competition.

Keywords

Keyword Advertising, Trademark Infringement, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Initial Interest Confusion, Intermediary Liability, Section 79 IT Act, Google Ads Jurisprudence, Digital Marketing Law India.

Citations

IRE Journals:
Poonam Sharma "A Doctrinal Study of Trademark Infringement in India’s Keyword Economy" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 1937-1940 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716471

IEEE:
Poonam Sharma "A Doctrinal Study of Trademark Infringement in India’s Keyword Economy" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10) https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716471