Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716494
The Impact of Remote Work on Employee Engagement and Productivity: A Systematic Review
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: HRM & OB
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716494
Abstract
Remote work proliferated all over the world since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and thus has fundamentally changed the way organizations work, collaborate, and measure performance. This is a systematic review that summarized studies on the effects of remote work on employee engagement and productivity. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, ten peer-reviewed studies were discussed in a variety of settings, such as hybrid or remote workplaces. Results indicate that remote employment supports the aspects of flexibility, autonomy, and work-life balance-significant facilitators of engagement and performance-and opens up issues of social isolation, boundary blur, and inefficiency in communications. The moderation factors that were found to play significant roles were leadership style, digital infrastructure, and employee self-regulations. On the whole, there is an indication that remote working can be engaging and productive with the presence of inclusive leadership, good digital communication system, and organizational support systems.
Keywords
Remote work, Employee engagement, Productivity, Systematic review, Hybrid work.
References
[1] Adriyanto, A. (2023). Evaluation of employee engagement level in improving productivity and etention in the company. Atestasi Journal, 6(1), 45-56.*
[2] Anakpo, G., Nqwayibana, Z., & Mishi, S. (2023). The impact of work-from-home on employee performance and productivity: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4529.*
[3] Andrlić, B., Priyashantha, K. G., & De Alwis, A. C. (2023). Employee engagement management in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(2), 987.*
[4] Arif, M. A., & Sherwani, N. U. K. (2025). Remote work and its impact on employee engagement and productivity: A bibliometric analysis. ICTACT Journal of Management Studies, 11(2), 2116-2123.*
[5] Back, K.-J. (Ed.). (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance Strategies in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003563358
[6] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.*
[7] Bakker, A. B., Van Emmerik, H., & Van Riet, P. (2008). How job demands, resources, and burnout predict objective performance: A constructive replication. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800801958637
[8] Choudhary, N., & Jain, S. (2025). A systematic literature review to explore the antecedents of employee engagement among remote workers. Journal of Work and Management, 17(1), 50-68.*
[9] Dharva, P. (2024). Assessing the disparities in COVID-19 outcomes among different socioeconomic and demographic groups and implications for public health policy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wales Trinity Saint David).
[10] Fatima, H., Javaid, Z. K., Arshad, Z., & Ashraf, M. (2024). A systematic review on the impact of remote work on employee engagement. Business and Behavioral Economics Journal, 11(3), 211-229.*
[11] Ferdous, T., Ali, M., & Desouza, K. C. (2025). An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews.
[12] Hajjami, O., & Crocco, O. S. (2024). Evolving approaches to employee engagement: Comparing antecedents in remote work and traditional workplaces. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(3-4), 375-392.*
[13] Kim, H. S., Waight, J., & Xu, X. (2025). Navigating leadership in hybrid or remote workplaces: A systematic review of employee engagement strategies. Human Resource Development Review, 24(1), 35-58.*
[14] Raghaw, D. (2024). Exploring the impact of remote work on employee engagement and productivity. International Journal of Industrial and Applied Psychology, 9(2), 115-128.*
[15] Ruželė, D., Stankevičienė, A., & Koreivaitė, G. (2025, October). The impact of remote work on job satisfaction, engagement and individual work performance in the banking sector. In Evidence-Based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship (Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 896-911). Emerald Publishing Limited.
[16] Sandoval, J. (2025). Communication Challenges Faced by Software Development Startup Small Businesses When Working With Remote Employees (Doctoral dissertation, City University of Seattle).
[17] Zhu, X., McCuskey Shepley, M., & Lu, Z. (Eds.). (2026). Environmental Design for Health: A Framework and Visual Guide (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003568148
How to cite this paper
@article{1716494,
author = {Sumit Kumar},
title = {The Impact of Remote Work on Employee Engagement and Productivity: A Systematic Review},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {1990-1998},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716494.pdf},
abstract = {Remote work proliferated all over the world since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and thus has fundamentally changed the way organizations work, collaborate, and measure performance. This is a systematic review that summarized studies on the effects of remote work on employee engagement and productivity. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, ten peer-reviewed studies were discussed in a variety of settings, such as hybrid or remote workplaces. Results indicate that remote employment supports the aspects of flexibility, autonomy, and work-life balance-significant facilitators of engagement and performance-and opens up issues of social isolation, boundary blur, and inefficiency in communications. The moderation factors that were found to play significant roles were leadership style, digital infrastructure, and employee self-regulations. On the whole, there is an indication that remote working can be engaging and productive with the presence of inclusive leadership, good digital communication system, and organizational support systems.},
keywords = {Remote work, Employee engagement, Productivity, Systematic review, Hybrid work.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716494}
}