Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716676
Green Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Incentives Within International Investment Agreements (IIAS): Effectiveness, Challenges, And Policy Implications
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Green Foreign Direct Investment
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716676
Abstract
The increasing severity of the climate change and the degradation of the environment have further increased the global endeavors to make the foreign investment more consistent with the sustainable development goals. Here, Green Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is now a favored tool of advancing environmentally sound economic activities, such as renewable energy, environmentally friendly technology and environmentally friendly infrastructure. Increasingly, the design of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) aimed at protecting investors and enabling the movement of capital includes provisions of sustainability orientation. The effectiveness of these commitments in motivating green FDI is also unclear, however. This paper is a critical look of the role of IIAs in the promotion of green FDI with the focus of the nature, scope and effectiveness of investment incentives within the framework of treaties. Following the method of a qualitative doctrinal research, the paper will examine the texts of the treaties, the policy documents and the scholarly literature to uncover the existing tendencies and shortcomings. The results indicate that even though contemporary IIAs have environmental provisions and corporate social responsibility clauses, and references to sustainable development, these provisions are mostly non-binding and unable to provide enforcement mechanisms, thus curtailing their practical influence on investment behavior (UNCTAD, 2023; OECD, 2022). Moreover, effective implementation of these incentives is compromised by such structural issues as the overwhelming influence of investor protection norms, regulatory limitation of host countries, and the threat of green washing (Sornararajah, 2017). The work posits that IIAs cannot be used to steer investment towards more sustainable results without fortification in law through stronger commitments of binding environmental requirements and enhanced accountability measures.
References
[1] Albornoz, F., Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Ercolani, M. G. (2009). In search of environmental spillovers. World Economy, 32(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01138.x
[2] Alschner, W. (2013). Environmental protection in investment arbitration: A treaty perspective. International Environmental Agreements, 13(3), 343–362.
[3] ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement. Jakarta: ASEAN.
[4] Berger, A., Busse, M., Nunnenkamp, P., & Roy, M. (2011). More stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Economics Letters, 112(3), 270–272.
[5] Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Zhang, J. (2017). Foreign direct investment and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 465–487.
[6] Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71.
[7] Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Addison- Wesley.
[8] European Commission. (2016). Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). Brussels.
[9] Golub, S. S., Kauffmann, C., & Yeres, P. (2011). Defining and measuring green FDI. OECD Working Papers on International Investment.
[10] Gordon, K., & Pohl, J. (2015). Environmental concerns in international investment agreements. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2015/01.
[11] Government of India. (2016). Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty.
[12] McCrudden, C. (2006). Legal research and the social sciences. Law Quarterly Review, 122, 632–650.
[13] Newcombe, A., & Paradell, L. (2009). Law and practice of investment treaties: Standards of treatment. Kluwer Law International.
[14] OECD. (2022). FDI Qualities Policy Toolkit. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[15] OECD. (2022). International investment agreements and sustainable development. OECD Publishing.
[16] Pazienza, P. (2015). The relationship between FDI and the natural environment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(4), 596–612.
[17] Sornarajah, M. (2017). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[18] Taglioni, D., Winkler, D., & others. (2013). Making global value chains work for development. World Bank Publications.
[19] Tienhaara, K. (2009). The expropriation of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press.
[20] UNCTAD. (2021). World Investment Report 2021: Investing in sustainable recovery. United Nations.
[21] UNCTAD. (2022). World Investment Report 2022: International tax reforms and sustainable investment. United Nations.
[22] UNCTAD. (2023). World Investment Report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. United Nations.
[23] UNCTAD. (2020). International investment agreements reform accelerator. United Nations.
[24] UNCTAD. (2019). Reforming investment dispute settlement: A stocktaking. United Nations.
[25] World Bank. (2020). Global investment competitiveness report 2019/2020. World Bank Publications.
[26] World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. World Bank.
[27] Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. N. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The political economy of the investment treaty regime. Oxford University Press.
[28] Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
[29] Johnson, L., Sachs, L., & Coleman, J. (2015). Investor-state dispute settlement, public interest and U.S. domestic law. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment.
How to cite this paper
@article{1716676,
author = {Indrani Mondal, Shruti Poddar},
title = {Green Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Incentives Within International Investment Agreements (IIAS): Effectiveness, Challenges, And Policy Implications},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {2294-2308},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716676.pdf},
abstract = {The increasing severity of the climate change and the degradation of the environment have further increased the global endeavors to make the foreign investment more consistent with the sustainable development goals. Here, Green Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is now a favored tool of advancing environmentally sound economic activities, such as renewable energy, environmentally friendly technology and environmentally friendly infrastructure. Increasingly, the design of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) aimed at protecting investors and enabling the movement of capital includes provisions of sustainability orientation. The effectiveness of these commitments in motivating green FDI is also unclear, however. This paper is a critical look of the role of IIAs in the promotion of green FDI with the focus of the nature, scope and effectiveness of investment incentives within the framework of treaties. Following the method of a qualitative doctrinal research, the paper will examine the texts of the treaties, the policy documents and the scholarly literature to uncover the existing tendencies and shortcomings. The results indicate that even though contemporary IIAs have environmental provisions and corporate social responsibility clauses, and references to sustainable development, these provisions are mostly non-binding and unable to provide enforcement mechanisms, thus curtailing their practical influence on investment behavior (UNCTAD, 2023; OECD, 2022). Moreover, effective implementation of these incentives is compromised by such structural issues as the overwhelming influence of investor protection norms, regulatory limitation of host countries, and the threat of green washing (Sornararajah, 2017). The work posits that IIAs cannot be used to steer investment towards more sustainable results without fortification in law through stronger commitments of binding environmental requirements and enhanced accountability measures.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716676}
}