Instructional Capability, Performance and Job Satisfaction Among Entrepreneurship Faculty

References

[1] Ariffin, M. F., Mat, Z., & Aris, A. (2020). A comprehensive review on determinants of employees’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 10(6). https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000314

[2] Ariffin, M., et al. (2020). Job satisfaction: Basis for professional development program. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24628

[3] Bongalonta, M. B. (2020). Job satisfaction of faculty members of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in Bicol, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.05.19

[4] Busque-Carrier, M., Ratelle, C. F., & Le Corff, Y. (2021). Work values and job satisfaction: The mediating role of basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Career Development, 49(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211043878

[5] Cabrera, J. S., & Eslabon, R. T. (2023). Teachers’ job satisfaction and performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(2).

[6] Daroy, I. T., & Gomez, D. O. (2025). Self-efficacy and job satisfaction as predictors of teachers’ performance in higher education institutions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21623

[7] De Cadiz, G. (2023). Student achievement: A gauge for attaining quality education. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4387535

[8] Department of Education. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. https://www.deped.gov.ph

[9] Department of Education. (2020). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Quezon City, Philippines: DepEd. https://tec.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Philippine-Professional-Standards-for-Teachers.pdf

[10] Dinda, A. (2024). Job satisfaction in the workplace: Systematic literature review (SLR). Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(6), 2014–2021. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i6.1135

[11] Dora, G. (2022, January–February). Teachers' working hours during the COVID-19 pandemic. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=teachers+performance+global+pandemic&id=EJ1328554

[12] East Tennessee State University. (2020). Definition of faculty and types of faculty appointments. Retrieved from definition_of_faculty_and_types_of_faculty_appointments_08242020.pdf

[13] Elger, D. (2007). Theory of performance. In Course design guide (pp. 1–5).

[14] Eryilmaz, N., Kennedy, A. I., Strietholt, R., & Johansson, S. (2025). Teacher job effectiveness and job satisfaction among teachers: The role of subject matter and other demographic variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 674504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674504

[15] Fernández-Macias, E., & Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente, R. (2014). Job satisfaction. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3451–3454). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1632

[16] Gamuza, R. A., Lachica, R. L., & Bautista, M. A. (2025). Teachers’ self‑efficacy and performance. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 2(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647894

[17] Gepila, E. C., Jr. (2020). Assessing teachers using Philippine standards for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080302

[18] Guibin, M. (2025). Job satisfaction. In The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 784–785). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55647-5_1632

[19] Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

[20] Janaban, A. A. (2021). Knowledge, practices and teaching performance among teachers. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11482726

[21] Kamijan, Y. (2021). Faktor internal dan faktor eksternal terhadap kinerja guru di masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 2(5), 630–638.

[22] Kanya, N., Fathoni, A. B., & Ramdani, Z. (2021). Factors affecting teacher performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(4), 21693. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21693

[23] Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2026). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. Harvard Business School Faculty & Research. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/topics/Pages/entrepreneurship.aspx

[24] Palmera, N. S. (2025). School heads’ instructional management and teachers’ capability of public elementary schools. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(8). eISSN: 2799-0664.

[25] Piquero, L. (2023). Teachers’ core competencies and performance in a DepEd high school. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal,16(2), 460–470. Philippine E-Journals.

[26] Puruwita, R., Jamian, A., & Azir, M. (2022). Instructional leadership and teachers’ job performance at high-performing vocational schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15413a

[27] Ratten, V. (2023). Entrepreneurship: Definitions, opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22217

[28] Sucalit, Y. D., & Curayag, E. P. (2025). Teachers’ job satisfaction in relation to their teaching performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.470105

[29] Tamban, V., & Maningas, O. (2020). Research capability of public school teachers: A basis for research capability enhancement program. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.61.222235

[30] Udechukwu, O. D. (2024). Understanding job satisfaction and its influences in Nigerian government firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(5s), 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2453

[31] Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

[32] Zhang, X., & An, I. L. (2024). Teacher’s instructional competence, commitment, and satisfaction. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 28(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3684

@article{1716700,
      author = {Rose Lyn G. Abuan, Anelyn A. Janaban, DM},
      title = {Instructional Capability, Performance and Job Satisfaction Among Entrepreneurship Faculty},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {2707-2725},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716700.pdf},
      abstract = {This study determined the instructional capability, performance, and job satisfaction among entrepreneurship faculty in State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) across Panay Island, Philippines, during Academic Year 2025- 2026. A total of 107 faculty members from six SUCs participated. Data were gathered through a validated questionnaire on faculty profile, instructional capability, and job satisfaction, while performance ratings were obtained from the Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF). Using a descriptive correlational design, the study employed frequency count, percentage, mean, Mann-Whitney U Test, Kruskal-Wallis H Test, and Spearman’s rho at a 0.05 level of significance. Results indicated that faculty demonstrated Very High instructional capability, Very Satisfactory performance and Very High job satisfaction. Significant differences in instructional capability and job satisfaction were observed by age, length of service, and academic rank, but not by sex and educational attainment. Faculty performance remained consistent across classifications. Correlational analysis revealed that instructional capability and performance were not significantly related; however, both were positively associated with job satisfaction. Recommendations include enhancing faculty development programs, strengthening institutional support systems, implementing recognition and incentive mechanisms, and fostering innovation and mentoring. These measures aim to sustain high instructional capability, effective performance, and professional fulfillment among entrepreneurship faculty in SUCs.},
      keywords = {Instructional Capability, Performance, Job Satisfaction, Entrepreneurship Faculty},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716700}
  }