Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716702
Employees’ Engagement, Innovative Practices and Performance
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Education
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716702
Abstract
This study examined employees’ engagement, innovative practices, and performance in manufacturing firms across the five congressional districts in the Province of Iloilo for the year 2025. Employees were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure fair representation. A researcher-made questionnaire adopted from various relevant literature, validated using Good and Scates criteria and pilot-tested for reliability, served as the primary instrument. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson’s r in SPSS at a 0.05 alpha level. Findings revealed that employees demonstrated high engagement, regularly practiced innovative behaviors, and consistently delivered outstanding performance. Engagement was most evident in confidence in leadership, belief in mission and values, and organizational pride. Innovation was reflected in sustainability advocacy, knowledge-sharing, and digital communication, while performance was highlighted by ethical standards, effective communication, and goal-setting. Differences in engagement were not significant across demographics, while innovative practices varied by position and tenure, and performance differed only by position. Correlation analysis confirmed significant relationships among engagement, innovation, and performance, underscoring their interconnected role in workplace success. Conclusions indicated that Iloilo’s manufacturing workforce was largely composed of older employees and high school graduates, distributed across managerial, supervisory, and rank-and-file roles. Employees consistently showed dedication, creativity, and professionalism, with leaders and newer employees displaying stronger innovation and performance. Recommendations encouraged stakeholders to strengthen leadership development, workforce training, sustainability advocacy, and collaboration to sustain competitiveness in Iloilo’s manufacturing sector.
Keywords
Employees’ Engagement, Innovative Practices, and Performance
References
[1] Al Hamdan, Z. and Issa, H. B., 2022. The role of organizational support and self‐efficacy on work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, pp. 1–11.
[2] AlMazrouei, H. (2021). Empowerment leadership as a predictor of expatriates learning goal orientation and creative work involvement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08- 2020-2366.
[3] Andika, R., & Darmanto, S. (2020). The effect of employee empowerment and intrinsic motivation on organizational commitment and employee performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 18(2), 241-251.
[4] Amah, O. E., (2020). Innovative Work Behaviors: Role of Employee Engagement & Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(2), pp. 356–173.
[5] Arnoff, J. (1971) Achievement Motivations Training and Executives advancement, Journal of Applied Science New York Vol. 7(1).
[6] Budriene, D. and Diskiene, D., 2020. Employee Engagement: Types, Levels and Relationship With Practice of Hrm. Malaysian E Commerce Journal, 4(2), pp. 42–47. https://doi.org/10.26480/mecj.02.2020.42.47
[7] Bakker, A. B. and Demerouti, E., 2008. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), pp. 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
[8] Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. (1995), ‘Empowering Service Employees’, Sloan Management Review, 36(4): 73-84.
[9] Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L. and Leiter, M. P., 2011. Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), pp. 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.546711
[10] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[11] Business Victoria. (2023). Improve employee innovation: Increase profitability and staff retention with an innovative culture. https://business.vic.gov.au/business-information/grow-your-business/improve-employee-innovation
[12] Chen, M. Despeisse, B. Johansson, (2020). Environmental sustainability of digitalization in manufacturing: a review Sustainability (Switzerland), pp. 1-33, 10.3390/su122410298
[13] Choi, S. L., Goh, C. F., Adam, M.B.H., & Tan, O. K. (2016). Transformational leadership, empowerment, and job satisfaction: The mediating role of employee empowerment. Human Resources for Health, 14(73), 1–14. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12960-016-0171-2
[14] Cui, J. (2025). The Explore of Knowledge Management Dynamic Capabilities, AI-Driven Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge-Based Organizational Support, and Organizational Learning on Job Performance: Evidence from Chinese Technological Companies. arXiv preprint. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02468
[15] Configurational Theory in Traditional Manufacturing Industries: A New Model of High-Performing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176818
[16] Dr. N. Deepalakshmi, 2024. Employee Engagement And Organizational Performance: A Human Resource Perspective April 2024 Educational Administration Theory and Practice journal 30(4):5941-5948 DOI:10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2323
[17] Dixit, A., & Upadhyay, Y. (2021). Role of JD-R model in upticking innovative work behaviour among higher education faculty. RAUSP Management Journal, 56(2), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-03-2020-0060
[18] El Junusi, Rahman & Agriyanto, Ratno & Wardayati, Maria. (2023). The Role of Innovative Work Behavior and Proactive Behavior in Mediating Employee Engagement and Performance at Public Universities. International Journal of Economics and Management. 17. 345-358. 10.47836/ijeam.17.3.05.
[19] Afum, Y. Agyabeng-Mensah, JA. Owusu, (2020). Translating environmental management practices into improved environmental performance via green organizational culture: insight from Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs J. Supply Chain Manage. Syst., pp. 31-49
[20] E. Appelbaum, t. bailey, p. berg, a.L kalleberg bailey t. A. (2000).Manufacturing advantage: why high-performance work systems pay off Cornell Univ. Press.
[21] Fierce. (2023). The Financial Rewards of Employee Engagement: Better Relationships Bring Results. A fierce white paper. www.fierceinc.com https://wethrive.net/employee-engagement/engagement-models-theories/
[22] Gallup., (2018). The engaged workplace. https://www.gallup.com/services/%0A190118/engaged-workplace.aspx.
[23] Gindert, M., & Müller, M. L. (2024). The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Ideation and the Performance of Innovation Teams. arXiv preprint. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18357
[24] Ghani, B., Hyder, S.I., Yoo, S.J.B., & Han, H. (2023). Does employee engagement promote innovation? The Facilitators of innovative workplace behaviour via mediation and moderation. Heliyon, 9(11), e21817.
[25] Hessari, H., Daneshmandi, F., & Nategh, T. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Technostress on the Perceived Organizational Commitment by Mediating Role of Individual Innovation. arXiv preprint. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07806
[26] High-commitment management. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-commitment_management
[27] Side project time. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_project_time
[28] Ichdan, D, A. (2024). Analysis of employee performance through productivity: The role of kaizen culture, motivation, and work discipline in the manufacturing industry. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 4(1), 13-28.
[29] Incentive Research Foundation (2019). What top performing manufacturing companies do differently for incentives and rewards. Retrieved from https://theirf.org/research_post/what-top-performing-manufacturing-companies-do-differently-for-incentives-and-rewards-2019/
[30] Javaid, A. Haleem, R.P. Singh, R. Suman, S. Rab, (2021). Role of additive manufacturing applications towards environmental sustainability Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res., pp. 312-322, 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.07.005
[31] Jánošková, K., & Kráľ, P. (2021). Innovation measurement: An extensive literature analysis. SHS Web of Conferences, 129, 05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112905003
[32] Kaur, N. (2025). Productivity and efficiency in the manufacturing sector: The effect of employee engagement on organizational performance. JOISS Research. Retrieved from https://joissresearch.org/journal/productivity-and-efficiency-in-the-manufacturing-sector-the-effect-of-employee-engagement-on-organizational-performance/.
[33] Karuna, Jadhav, (2023), September 2023. "A Study on Innovative Employee Engagement Practices."DOI:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393660241_A_Study_on_Innovative_Employee_Engagement_Practices
[34] Knox, S., & Marin-Cadavid, C. (2022). A practice approach to fostering employee engagement in innovation initiatives in public service organizations. Public Management Review, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2055775
[35] Kunc, M., & O’Brien, F. (2019). The resource-based view: A review anassessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 45(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798331
[36] Ludmilla Shkurti and Labeat Mustafa (2024). The impact of employee engagement and innovation performance on business success in manufacturing and service enterprises in Albania and Kosovo. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 94-102. doi:10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.09
[37] Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2018). Goal setting theory: Controversies and resolutions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.002
[38] Maskudi, Suseno BD, Munawir A, Firjatullah S. (2024). Employee innovation performance: Exploring non-standard service relationships, psychological contracts, and knowledge sharing in green manufacturing industry development. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(7): 5111. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.5111
[39] Madonna P. Melchor, 2024. The Influence of HRM Practices on Employee Performance: A Study of Retail Establishments in a Municipality in the Philippine Mindoro State University- Bongabong, Philippines DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100252 Received: 16 October 2024; Accepted: 21 October 2024; Published: 21 November 2024
[40] Maskudi, Suseno BD, Munawir A, Firjatullah S. (2024). Employee innovation performance: Exploring non-standard service relationships, psychological contracts, and knowledge sharing in green manufacturing industry development. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(7): 5111. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.5111
[41] Mamun, et.al, (2020). A Theoretical Study On Factors Influencing Employees Performance, Rewards And Motivation Within Organisation. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(3).113-124.2020
[42] Nacu, A. (2023). Performance evaluation survey questions. Forms.app.. Retrieved from https://forms.app/en/blog/performance-evaluation-survey
[43] Nair, S., Ni, L. W., Tabianan, K., Perumal, I., & Jayabalan, N. (2023). Factors affecting employee performance in the manufacturing industry: A study on Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 58(1). Retrieved from https://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1546
[44] Paillé, JH. Meija-Morelos, (2019). Organisational support is not always enough to encourage employee environmental performance. The moderating role of exchange ideology J.Clean.Prod.,pp. 10611070,10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.192
[45] Q. Wang, R. Shi, F. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Gao, (2022), How organizational psychological ownership affects corporate green operations - based on a social exchange theory perspective Front. Psychol., 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985017
[46] Rahadian, F. A. (2020). Employee performance and knowledge management in a manufacturing company: Internal and external factors to consider. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 4(4). Retrieved from https://dinastipub.org/DIJDBM/article/view/1899
[47] R. Cropanzano, MS. Mitchell, (2005), Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review J. Manage, pp. 874-900, 10.1177/0149206305279602
[48] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
[49] Sabbir MdM, KMR. Taufique, (2022). Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non-cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy Bus. Strategy. Environment pp. 11012810.1002/bse.2877
[50] Shah, A. K., Shukla, A., & Rao, P. K. (2025). Evaluating employee performance in the Indian manufacturing sectors: Identifying critical success factors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijoa-0920244812/full/html
[51] Lorincová, P. Štarchoň, D. Weberová, M. Hitka, M. Lipoldová, (2019).Employee motivation as a tool to achieve sustainability of business processes Sustainability in Switzerland.
[52] Sheila D. Cabrestante, Eric Arthur N. Dio* Graduate School, University of St. La Salle, Bacolod City, Philippines. Leadership Competencies as Predictors of Employee Engagement: The Role of Driving Change Through Innovation. September 2025. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives 3(10):531-538. DOI:10.69569/jip.2025.644
[53] Schendlinger, T. (2023). Drivers and challenges of business model innovation. Master’s thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz
[54] Toms, B. K., & Naseer, N. (2023). A study of performance of employees in manufacturing companies. Elementary Education Online, 20(3), 4564–4569. Retrieved from https://ilkogretimonline.org/index.php/pub/article/view/2904
[55] T. Iftikar, S. Hussain, M.I. Malik, S. Hyder, M. Kaleem, A. Saqib, (2022). Green human resource management and pro-environmental behaviour nexus with the lens of AMO theory Cogent Bus. Manage., (2022), 10.1080/23311975.2022.2124603
[56] T. Arshi, 2019, Assessing impact of employee engagement on innovation and the mediating role of readiness for innovation January 2019 International Journal of Comparative Management 2(2):174 DOI:10.1504/IJCM.2019.100857
[57] Van Zyl, and Olckers, C., (2021). Work engagement and task performance within a global Dutch ICT-consulting firm: The mediating role of innovative work behaviors. Current Psychology, 40(8), pp. 4012–4023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00339-1
How to cite this paper
@article{1716702,
author = {Roselyn P. Paclejan, Anelyn A. Janaban, DM},
title = {Employees’ Engagement, Innovative Practices and Performance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {2746-2765},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716702.pdf},
abstract = {This study examined employees’ engagement, innovative practices, and performance in manufacturing firms across the five congressional districts in the Province of Iloilo for the year 2025. Employees were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure fair representation. A researcher-made questionnaire adopted from various relevant literature, validated using Good and Scates criteria and pilot-tested for reliability, served as the primary instrument. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson’s r in SPSS at a 0.05 alpha level. Findings revealed that employees demonstrated high engagement, regularly practiced innovative behaviors, and consistently delivered outstanding performance. Engagement was most evident in confidence in leadership, belief in mission and values, and organizational pride. Innovation was reflected in sustainability advocacy, knowledge-sharing, and digital communication, while performance was highlighted by ethical standards, effective communication, and goal-setting. Differences in engagement were not significant across demographics, while innovative practices varied by position and tenure, and performance differed only by position. Correlation analysis confirmed significant relationships among engagement, innovation, and performance, underscoring their interconnected role in workplace success. Conclusions indicated that Iloilo’s manufacturing workforce was largely composed of older employees and high school graduates, distributed across managerial, supervisory, and rank-and-file roles. Employees consistently showed dedication, creativity, and professionalism, with leaders and newer employees displaying stronger innovation and performance. Recommendations encouraged stakeholders to strengthen leadership development, workforce training, sustainability advocacy, and collaboration to sustain competitiveness in Iloilo’s manufacturing sector.},
keywords = {Employees’ Engagement, Innovative Practices, and Performance},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716702}
}