International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717035

1717035 Vol 9 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?

Scott D. Clary

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Influencer Marketing

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035

Abstract

This study examines the comparative effectiveness of influencer marketing and traditional advertising by analyzing their impact on consumer engagement, brand awareness, purchase intention, and return on investment. A survey of 156 consumers with documented exposure to both marketing formats was conducted alongside interviews with 18 marketing practitioners. Respondents evaluated recent influencer and traditional advertising campaigns across five product categories. Quantitative analysis using paired-samples t-tests and multiple regression revealed that influencer marketing generates significantly higher consumer engagement and purchase intention (source credibility β = 0.52, p < 0.01; content relevance β = 0.38, p < 0.01) than traditional advertising, driven primarily by perceived source credibility and content authenticity. Traditional advertising demonstrated comparable performance in broad brand recall (71% vs. 64%, p = 0.15) and remained effective for mass-market awareness objectives. ROI analysis indicated that influencer campaigns achieved a mean cost-per-engagement of $0.82 compared to $3.24 for traditional formats. The findings suggest that neither approach is universally superior; effectiveness is contingent on strategic objectives, target demographics, and product category. A hybrid approach integrating both methods is recommended for optimal marketing performance.

Keywords

Influencer Marketing, Traditional Advertising, Consumer Engagement, Brand Awareness, Advertising ROI, Source Credibility

References

[1] Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Influencer marketing effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 86(6), 93–115. doi:10.1177/00222429221102889

[2] Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003

[3] Influencer Marketing Hub. (2024). Influencer Marketing Benchmark Report 2024. Retrieved from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/

[4] Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1

[5] Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12647

[6] Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501

[7] Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898

[8] Pansari, A., & Kumar, V. (2017). Customer engagement: The construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 294–311. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6

[9] Hollebeek, L. D., & Macky, K. (2019). Digital content marketing’s role in fostering consumer engagement, trust, and value. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 27–41. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003

[10] Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 261–277. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095222

[11] Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(3), 164–174. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1437853

[12] De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035

[13] Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.1177/002224299305700101

[14] Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. Free Press.

[15] Shapiro, B. T., Hitsch, G. J., & Tuchman, A. E. (2021). TV advertising effectiveness and profitability: Generalizable results from 288 brands. Econometrica, 89(4), 1855–1879. doi:10.3982/ECTA17674

[16] Zeqiri, J., Koku, P. S., Dobre, C., Milovan, A. M., Hasani, V. V., & Paientko, T. (2025). The impact of social media marketing on brand awareness and purchase intention. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 43(1), 28–49. doi:10.1108/MIP-06-2023-0248

[17] Gordon, B. R., Zettelmeyer, F., Bhatt, N., & Chapsky, D. (2019). A comparison of approaches to advertising measurement. Marketing Science, 38(6), 913–936. doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1181

[18] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

[19] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[20] Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191

How to cite this paper

Scott D. Clary "Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 3577-3583 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035
Scott D. Clary "Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035
Scott D. Clary (2026). Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035
Scott D. Clary "Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035
@article{1717035,
      author = {Scott D. Clary},
      title = {Influencer Marketing Vs Traditional Advertising: Which Is More Effective?},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {3577-3583},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717035.pdf},
      abstract = {This study examines the comparative effectiveness of influencer marketing and traditional advertising by analyzing their impact on consumer engagement, brand awareness, purchase intention, and return on investment. A survey of 156 consumers with documented exposure to both marketing formats was conducted alongside interviews with 18 marketing practitioners. Respondents evaluated recent influencer and traditional advertising campaigns across five product categories. Quantitative analysis using paired-samples t-tests and multiple regression revealed that influencer marketing generates significantly higher consumer engagement and purchase intention (source credibility β = 0.52, p < 0.01; content relevance β = 0.38, p < 0.01) than traditional advertising, driven primarily by perceived source credibility and content authenticity. Traditional advertising demonstrated comparable performance in broad brand recall (71% vs. 64%, p = 0.15) and remained effective for mass-market awareness objectives. ROI analysis indicated that influencer campaigns achieved a mean cost-per-engagement of $0.82 compared to $3.24 for traditional formats. The findings suggest that neither approach is universally superior; effectiveness is contingent on strategic objectives, target demographics, and product category. A hybrid approach integrating both methods is recommended for optimal marketing performance.},
      keywords = {Influencer Marketing, Traditional Advertising, Consumer Engagement, Brand Awareness, Advertising ROI, Source Credibility},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717035}
  }