Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717322
Analysis of Passenger Expectations and Satisfaction in the Airline Industry Using SERVQUAL and ECT Framework
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717322
Abstract
This paper will analyse passenger expectations and satisfaction within the airline industry by determining the important factors in influencing service perceptions, the differences between frequent and non-frequent flyers, and the possible service quality improvements. The study uses the Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT) and SERVQUAL framework to assess the difference between the expectations and perceived service performance of the passengers. It adopted a mixed-method research design, which integrated structured survey responses on 161 airline passengers with a qualitative feedback analysis. Demographic trends, dimensions of service quality, and satisfaction ratings among passengers of various segments were analysed with the help of statistical tools. According to the results, punctuality, responsiveness of customer service, seat comfort, cleanliness of cabin, and in-flight services play a significant role in the overall satisfaction of a passenger. Comparative analysis shows that frequent flyers consider reliability and personalized services to be more important, and non-frequent flyers view comfort and cost aspects as the most important. The analysis also reveals there are significant gaps in punctuality, in-flight services and digital service integration as the main aspects that should be improved. The findings have practical implications for airline management to improve their service quality, passenger loyalty, and close expectation-performance gaps by making specific operational and service improvements.
Keywords
Airline Industry, Passenger Satisfaction, Service Quality, Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), SERVQUAL Framework, Frequent Flyers, Service Improvement, Customer Experience, Reliability, Punctuality.
References
[1] R. L. Oliver, “A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 460–469, 1980.
[2] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality,” J. Retail., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 12–40, 1988.
[3] J. Smith and L. Thomas, “Understanding customer preferences in airline services: A statistical analysis,” J. Aviat. Stud., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 45–60, 2023.
[4] J. An and Y. Noh, “Airline customer satisfaction and loyalty: Impact of in-flight service quality,” Serv. Bus., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 293–307, 2009.
[5] T. Curtis, “Satisfaction with airline service quality: Frequent vs non-frequent flyers,” Int. J. Aviat. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 40–55, 2012.
[6] H. Jiang, “Service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty in China’s airline industry,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 57, pp. 65–75, 2016.
[7] E. Park, “Determinants of customer satisfaction with airline services,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 133, pp. 112–124, 2019.
[8] H. Ban and H. Kim, “Understanding customer experience and satisfaction through airline passengers’ online reviews,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 15, Art. no. 4066, 2019.
[9] J. Ali, A. Jusoh, A. Q. Abro, and M. A. Abro, “Service quality and its impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty in the airline industry: A PLS-SEM approach,” J. Contemp. Issues Bus. Gov., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 273–290, 2021.
[10] N. Batarlienė, “Assessment of factors determining airline consumer loyalty,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, Art. no. 1320, 2023.
[11] L. Dell’Olio, “Passengers’ perception of airlines’ services: Addressing quality and satisfaction,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 103, Art. no. 102229, 2025.
[12] “Drivers and outcomes of airline passenger satisfaction: A meta-analysis,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 11, Art. no. 100522, 2024.
[13] “Service quality and customer satisfaction in Nigerian air transport,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 50, pp. 12–20, 2016.
[14] International Air Transport Association, “Annual report on global air passenger trends,” IATA, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2024.
[15] Airline Industry Reports, “Passenger satisfaction trends and airline service improvement factors,” Aviation Insights Publication, 2024.
How to cite this paper
@article{1717322,
author = {Mohammed Tahir Pasha, Jeffery Ebenezer},
title = {Analysis of Passenger Expectations and Satisfaction in the Airline Industry Using SERVQUAL and ECT Framework},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {503-508},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717322.pdf},
abstract = {This paper will analyse passenger expectations and satisfaction within the airline industry by determining the important factors in influencing service perceptions, the differences between frequent and non-frequent flyers, and the possible service quality improvements. The study uses the Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT) and SERVQUAL framework to assess the difference between the expectations and perceived service performance of the passengers. It adopted a mixed-method research design, which integrated structured survey responses on 161 airline passengers with a qualitative feedback analysis. Demographic trends, dimensions of service quality, and satisfaction ratings among passengers of various segments were analysed with the help of statistical tools. According to the results, punctuality, responsiveness of customer service, seat comfort, cleanliness of cabin, and in-flight services play a significant role in the overall satisfaction of a passenger. Comparative analysis shows that frequent flyers consider reliability and personalized services to be more important, and non-frequent flyers view comfort and cost aspects as the most important. The analysis also reveals there are significant gaps in punctuality, in-flight services and digital service integration as the main aspects that should be improved. The findings have practical implications for airline management to improve their service quality, passenger loyalty, and close expectation-performance gaps by making specific operational and service improvements.},
keywords = {Airline Industry, Passenger Satisfaction, Service Quality, Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), SERVQUAL Framework, Frequent Flyers, Service Improvement, Customer Experience, Reliability, Punctuality.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717322}
}