A Review on Auto- Mechanized Scarecrow for Agricultural Purpose

References

[1] C. Pornpanomchai, M. Homnan, N. Pramuksan, and W. Rakyindee, “Smart Scarecrow,” in International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 294–297, doi: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2011.644.

[2] K. Król, Kao, and J. Hernik, “The Scarecrow as an Indicator of Changes in the Cultural Heritage of Rural Poland,” Sustainability, vol. 11, p. 6857, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11236857.

[3] A. A. Alneimi, M. J. Alsaidi, and M. F. Elahag, “Multi-function e-scarecrow (MFeSC),” Journal of Student Research, 2020.

[4] O. Barakat, S. Hashim, A. Ramli, F. Hashim, K. Samsudin, I. Al-Baltah, and M. Al-Habshi, “SCARECROW: Scalable Malware Reporting, Detection and Analysis,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 8, pp. 1–12, 2013.

[5] D. Miller, J. Milstein, and C. Stein, “Scarecrow: If I only had AI,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 22, pp. 325–332, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10514-006-9017-4.

[6] C. Lesté-Lasserre, “Scarecrows at sea may save many birds,” New Scientist, vol. 250, p. 21, 2021, doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(21)00832-0.

[7] J. Araguz, “Confessions of a Former Scarecrow,” Prairie Schooner, vol. 94, pp. 31–32, 2020, doi: 10.1353/psg.2020.0082.

[8] K. Betz-Heinemann and J. Tzanopoulos, “Scarecrows and Scapegoats: The Futility and Power of Cleaning a Landscape,” Worldwide Waste: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, 2020, doi: 10.5334/wwwj.33.

[9] W. Abdelhakim, “Scaring Birds: The Concept of the Scarecrow in Ancient Egypt,” International Journal of Heritage, Tourism and Hospitality, vol. 14, pp. 42–51, 2020, doi: 10.21608/ijhth.2020.154143.

[10] S. Davies, “Dingle dangle scarecrow,” Early Years Educator, vol. 20, pp. viii–ix, 2018, doi: 10.12968/eyed.2018.20.4.viii.

[11] A. Nollkaemper, “Saving the Scarecrow,” European Journal of International Law, vol. 26, pp. 957–964, 2015, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chv060.

[12] G. Delanty, “The Scarecrow,” The Irish Review, vol. 10, 1991, doi: 10.2307/29735594.

[13] E. Hone, “Science Scarecrows,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 70, pp. 322–326, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1970.tb08631.x.

[14] J. Thomas, “Automated Deer Scarecrow,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, 2002, doi: 10.1121/1.151.

@article{1717332,
      author = {Prof. S. S. Pawar, Kumar Nimbarte, Ranjitkumar Jambhulkar, Vaibhav Zalke},
      title = {A Review on Auto- Mechanized Scarecrow for Agricultural Purpose},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {30-34},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717332.pdf},
      abstract = {The automatic scarecrow is a viable and consistent alternative for protecting agricultural produce from bird and animal infestations. By safely repelling the pests, it efficiently eliminates any form of destruction on the crop. The objective of the project was to create and construct a mechanical bird repellant that produces a distress sound to ward off birds. RF modules were employed to create two wireless devices under the control of an ATmega328P microcontroller. The prototype includes a sound system, a motorized mechanism, and a motion detector. Once motion is detected, the system will activate both the servomotors and the buzzer to make the device move and emit the sound. The contemporary scarecrow is an adaptable solution to be used for various purposes ranging from minimizing monetary losses due to bird infestations to humanely repelling birds from farmlands.},
      keywords = {Flapping mechanism, Linear Motion, Buzzer. Bird Repellent.},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717332}
  }