Suitability of Chemistry Laboratory Equipment in Secondary Schools: Evidence from Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya

References

[1] Adewusi, O. (2020). Chemistry education and the realisation of Kenya Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(4), 35–48.

[2] Asare, I., Parker, J., & Osei-Himah, V. (2018). Teachers' attitude towards improvisation and its effect on the study of science in the Junior High Schools in Aowin Municipality, Ghana. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(4), 90–95.

[3] Githui, M. W., Koech, P. K., & Thinguri, R. (2021). Influence of teachers' improvisation of heat-producing materials on acquisition of science skills among pre-primary school learners in Kiambu, Kenya. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 34(9), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2021/v34i930357

[4] Gongden, E. J., Gongden, J. J., & Lohdip, Y. N. (2020). Assessment of the difficult areas of the senior secondary school chemistry syllabus. African Journal of Chemical Education, 10(1), 19–29.

[5] Ibe, F. N., Obikezie, M., & Chikendu, R. (2021). Effect of improvised instructional materials on chemistry students' academic retention in secondary school. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 1(5), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.46654/IJRESD.1520

[6] Iyamuremye, A., Twagilimana, I., & Niyonzima, F. N. (2024). Examining the utilization of web-based discussion tools in teaching and learning organic chemistry in selected Rwandan secondary schools. Heliyon, 10(20), e39356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39356

[7] Kenya National Examinations Council. (2023). 2022 KCSE examination essential statistics. KNEC. https://knec.ac.ke/

[8] Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

[9] Khamali, J. B., Mondoh, H. O., & Kwen, J. A. (2025). Relationship between availability of laboratory materials and students' academic performance in chemistry in Kilifi North Constituency, Kenya. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 15(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.15.1.0121

[10] Kyado, J. J., Achor, E. E., & Adejoh, M. J. (2021). Science laboratory availability, adequacy and utilization as correlates of students' academic achievement in chemistry in senior secondary schools. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research: Sciences, Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 82–99.

[11] Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.

[12] Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Factors affecting secondary schools students' attitudes toward learning chemistry: A review of literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1931. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379

[13] Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2018). Implementation of the competence-based curriculum: An overview of science teacher training in Rwanda. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 357–367.

[14] Ngendabanga, C., Nkurunziza, J. B., & Mugabo, L. R. (2025a). Innovative approaches in chemistry teaching: A systematic review on the use of improvised chemicals for student engagement and performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00302K

[15] Ngendabanga, C., Nkurunziza, J. B., & Mugabo, L. R. (2025b). The use of improvised chemicals and materials in teaching and learning chemistry in two selected districts of Rwanda. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2461138. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2461138

[16] Okori, O. A., & Jerry, O. (2017). Improvisation and utilisation of resources in the teaching and learning of science and mathematics in secondary schools in Cross River State. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i1.4

[17] Ramaila, S. (2022). The use of improvised resources in science classrooms in South African township schools. In M. Carmo (Ed.), Education and New Developments 2022 (pp. 367–370). inScience Press. https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v1end083

[18] Ramothwala, M., & Ramaila, S. (2020). Factors influencing teachers' inclination to use improvised resources in life sciences classrooms. In M. Carmo (Ed.), Education and New Developments 2020 (pp. 12–15). inScience Press. https://doi.org/10.36315/2020end003

[19] Reid, N., & Ali, A. A. (2020). Making sense of learning: A research-based approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53677-0

@article{1717369,
      author = {Wekesa Davis Namaswa},
      title = {Suitability of Chemistry Laboratory Equipment in Secondary Schools: Evidence from Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {763-773},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717369.pdf},
      abstract = {Chemistry occupies a strategic place in Kenya's science curriculum, yet KCSE performance in the subject has remained poor for over a decade. Drawing on the first objective of a larger descriptive survey, this paper examines the suitability of Chemistry laboratory equipment in public secondary schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Western Kenya. The study was guided by Dewey's experiential learning theory and adopted a descriptive survey design. A sample of 320 respondents was drawn from a universe of 2,210, comprising principals, Heads of Chemistry Department, Chemistry teachers, laboratory technicians, Form Four students, the Sub-County Quality Assurance and Standards Officer, and the SMASSE Sub-County coordinator. Data were generated through questionnaires, interview schedules, and an observation checklist, and analysed with descriptive statistics using SPSS version 19.0. Findings showed that Chemistry laboratory equipment was inadequate in 53.2% of the schools and that 33.8% of available resources were locally improvised, against 26.8% from government supply. When equipment was lacking, 46.5% of respondents reverted to theoretical instruction. The principal barriers to equipment acquisition were unreliable Constituency Development Fund disbursements (70.4%), inadequate government allocations (64.8%), and teacher understaffing (35.2%). The study concludes that equipment inadequacy is a systemic barrier to effective Chemistry instruction and recommends timely government funding, transparent CDF allocation, and the deployment of professionally qualified teachers and laboratory technicians.},
      keywords = {Chemistry laboratory equipment; Laboratory Research Method; Improvisation; Secondary schools.},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717369}
  }