Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717514
Distance-Based Assessment of Suspected Microplastic Particle Abundance in Agricultural Soils Near a Dumpsite in Central Luzon, Philippines
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Environmental Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717514
Abstract
Microplastic contamination in terrestrial environments has emerged as a growing environmental concern, particularly in agricultural soils that may act as sinks of plastic particles. This study assessed the abundance and characteristics of suspected microplastic particles in agricultural soils near a dumpsite in San Isidro, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, and examined how their distribution varies with distance. A quantitative descriptive design with a distance-based approach was used. Soil samples were collected from four zones located at 150 m, 300 m, 450 m, and 600 m from the dumpsite using composite sampling. Samples were processed through air-drying, sieving, density separation using sodium chloride (NaCl), and visual identification with hot needle testing. Results showed that suspected microplastic particles were present in all zones, with the highest abundance at 150 m (62 particles/kg) and the lowest at 600 m (5 particles/kg), indicating a decreasing trend with distance. Irregular plastic-like particles and fragments were the dominant forms, while smaller particles (0.9–<2 mm) were slightly more abundant. The findings suggest that proximity to the dumpsite may influence microplastic distribution in agricultural soils. This study demonstrates the usefulness of low-cost methods for preliminary assessment and highlights the need for improved waste management and further research using advanced analytical techniques.
References
[1] P. C. Bartley III, W. C. Fonteno, and B. E. Jackson, “Horticultural substrate characterization by sieve analysis,” HortScience, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 715–725, 2022.
[2] M. Bläsing and W. Amelung, “Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 612, pp. 422–435, 2018.
[3] M. Claessens et al., “Detection of microplastics in sediments,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 1–2, pp. 227–233, 2013.
[4] A. A. de Souza Machado et al., “Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 52, no. 17, pp. 9656–9665, 2018.
[5] J. P. G. L. Frias and R. Nash, “Microplastics: Definition consensus,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 138, pp. 145–147, 2019.
[6] G. W. Gee and J. W. Bauder, “Particle-size analysis,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd ed., pp. 383–411, 1986.
[7] C. Gonzales, R. F. Shiu, and H. P. Bacosa, “Microplastic pollution in agricultural soils in Iligan, Philippines,” Soil and Sediment Contamination, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 905–921, 2025.
[8] G. Kalčíková et al., “Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 231, pp. 221–228, 2017.
[9] Y. Li et al., “Microplastic pollution in rice systems,” Science of the Total Environment, 2023.
[10] Y. Liu et al., “Microplastics in the Haihe River,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 262, 2020.
[11] E.-L. Ng et al., “Microplastic pollution in agroecosystems,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 627, pp. 1377–1388, 2018.
[12] E. D. Osorio et al., “Microplastics in Manila Bay river systems,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 9, 2021.
[13] F. Radford et al., “Extraction of microplastics in soils,” Analytical Methods, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1695–1705, 2021.
[14] M. C. Rillig, R. Ingraffia, and A. A. de Souza Machado, “Microplastic incorporation in soils,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, 2017.
[15] M. C. Rillig et al., “Microplastic effects on plants,” New Phytologist, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 1066–1070, 2019.
[16] A. J. C. Santos et al., “Heavy metal contamination in Nueva Ecija soils,” Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology, 2021.
[17] Y. Seo et al., “Microplastics in soils: Extraction and identification methods,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2025.
[18] R. C. Thompson et al., “Lost at sea: Where is all the plastic?,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5672, p. 838, 2004.
[19] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Composite sampling,” 1995.
[20] W. Wang, J. Ge, and X. Yu, “Environmental fate of microplastics in soil ecosystems,” 2022.
[21] C. Zhang et al., “Microplastics in soils: Occurrence and sources,” Science of the Total Environment, 2021.
[22] G. S. Zhang and Y. F. Liu, “Distribution of microplastics in soil aggregates,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 642, pp. 12–20, 2020.
How to cite this paper
@article{1717514,
author = {John Rain P. Lomboy, C.J P. Fernando, Vicent Miel C. Dulay, Abegail C. Bautista, Engr. Rosel V. Babalcon},
title = {Distance-Based Assessment of Suspected Microplastic Particle Abundance in Agricultural Soils Near a Dumpsite in Central Luzon, Philippines},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {1951-1955},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717514.pdf},
abstract = {Microplastic contamination in terrestrial environments has emerged as a growing environmental concern, particularly in agricultural soils that may act as sinks of plastic particles. This study assessed the abundance and characteristics of suspected microplastic particles in agricultural soils near a dumpsite in San Isidro, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, and examined how their distribution varies with distance. A quantitative descriptive design with a distance-based approach was used. Soil samples were collected from four zones located at 150 m, 300 m, 450 m, and 600 m from the dumpsite using composite sampling. Samples were processed through air-drying, sieving, density separation using sodium chloride (NaCl), and visual identification with hot needle testing. Results showed that suspected microplastic particles were present in all zones, with the highest abundance at 150 m (62 particles/kg) and the lowest at 600 m (5 particles/kg), indicating a decreasing trend with distance. Irregular plastic-like particles and fragments were the dominant forms, while smaller particles (0.9–<2 mm) were slightly more abundant. The findings suggest that proximity to the dumpsite may influence microplastic distribution in agricultural soils. This study demonstrates the usefulness of low-cost methods for preliminary assessment and highlights the need for improved waste management and further research using advanced analytical techniques.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717514}
}