Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717678
Politics on Plate: Food Standards, Governance and the Health Welfare of Citizens in India
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Food Safety and Governance
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1717678
Abstract
Food regulation in India sits at the intersection of governance, politics, and public health, and this relationship directly shapes the quality of food available to consumers as well as the credibility of the systems meant to protect them. This study examines how governance influences both the making and enforcement of food safety policy, with particular attention to adulteration, contamination, and misleading labelling, all of which continue to pose serious risks to public health. Although the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India was established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 to create a more integrated regulatory framework, the continued adulteration of everyday products such as milk, spices, and edible oils shows that enforcement still falls short in practice. These violations do not just lower food quality; they also expose consumers to poisoning, malnutrition, and long-term lifestyle related diseases. The issue, then, is not only about law on paper but about a wider governance gap shaped by political interference, corruption, weak infrastructure, limited staffing, under equipped laboratories, and delays in legal adjudication. At the same time, fragmented accountability, overlaps between central and state agencies, and poor public access to regulatory data reduce transparency and weaken public trust. By combining legislative analysis, regulatory evaluation, and political economy, this research argues for stronger implementation, better institutional capacity, digital monitoring, and more open data systems so that food safety standards can translate into real consumer protection.
References
[1] Ansell C and Gash A, ‘Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice’ (2008) Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
[2] Bansal S and others, ‘Food Adulteration: Sources, Health Risks and Detection Methods’ (2015) 57 Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.
[3] Bardhan P, ‘The Economist’s Approach to the Problem of Corruption’ (2006) 34(2) World Development 341.
[4] Beck U, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Mark Ritter tr, Sage Publications 1992) (first published 1986).
[5] Buchanan JM and Tullock G, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (University of Michigan Press 1962). Centre for Public Interest Litigation v Union of India (2013) 16 SCC 279.
[6] Chan M, ‘Food Safety Must Accompany Food and Nutrition Security’ (2014) 384 The Lancet 1910. Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Performance Audit on Food Safety in India. Consumer Protection Act 2019.
[7] Crean D and Ayalew A, ‘Good Nutrition: The Critical Role of Food Safety in Ensuring Food Security’ (2016) <https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/452395> accessed 6 January 2025.
[8] Debnath A and others, ‘Qualitative Detection of Adulterants in Milk Samples from Kolkata and Its Suburban Areas’ (2015) 3 International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences 81.
[9] Dubash NK, Regulatory Institutions and Governance in India (Oxford University Press 2018).
[10] Food and Agriculture Organization, ‘Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System and Guidelines for Its Application’ in Recommended International Code of Practice: General Principles of Food Hygiene, Annex to CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev 3 <https://www.fao.org/3/y1579e/y1579e03.htm> accessed 6 January 2025.
[11] Food Safety and Standards Act 2006.
[12] Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations 2011.
[13] Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations 2011.
[14] Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations 2011.
[15] Grace D, ‘Food Safety in Low and Middle Income Countries’ (2015) 12(9) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10490.
[16] Haji A and others, ‘Selected Food Items Adulteration, Their Impacts on Public Health, and Detection Methods: A Review’ (2023) 11 Food Science and Nutrition 7534.
[17] Harris KJ, Dipietro RB, Murphy KS and others, ‘Critical Food Safety Violations in Florida: Relationship to Location and Chain Versus Non-Chain Restaurants’ (2014) 38 International Journal of Hospitality Management 57.
[18] Hutter BM, Managing Food Safety and Hygiene: Governance and Regulation as Risk Management (Edward Elgar 2011).
[19] India Filings, ‘Food Labeling Regulations in India’ <https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/> accessed 22 April 2025.
[20] In Re: Public Health – Protect the Present and Safeguard the Future from Food Adulteration (High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, 1 July 2024).
[21] Kandpal SD and others, ‘Estimation of Quality of Raw Milk (Open and Branded) by Milk Adulteration Testing Kit’ (2012) 24 Indian Journal of Community Health 188.
How to cite this paper
@article{1717678,
author = {Sankritya Singh},
title = {Politics on Plate: Food Standards, Governance and the Health Welfare of Citizens in India},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {4340-4345},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717678.pdf},
abstract = {Food regulation in India sits at the intersection of governance, politics, and public health, and this relationship directly shapes the quality of food available to consumers as well as the credibility of the systems meant to protect them. This study examines how governance influences both the making and enforcement of food safety policy, with particular attention to adulteration, contamination, and misleading labelling, all of which continue to pose serious risks to public health. Although the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India was established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 to create a more integrated regulatory framework, the continued adulteration of everyday products such as milk, spices, and edible oils shows that enforcement still falls short in practice. These violations do not just lower food quality; they also expose consumers to poisoning, malnutrition, and long-term lifestyle related diseases. The issue, then, is not only about law on paper but about a wider governance gap shaped by political interference, corruption, weak infrastructure, limited staffing, under equipped laboratories, and delays in legal adjudication. At the same time, fragmented accountability, overlaps between central and state agencies, and poor public access to regulatory data reduce transparency and weaken public trust. By combining legislative analysis, regulatory evaluation, and political economy, this research argues for stronger implementation, better institutional capacity, digital monitoring, and more open data systems so that food safety standards can translate into real consumer protection.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717678}
}