Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717714
Gap Analysis of Hazard identification & Risk Assessment (HIRA) System for JH Construction and Engineer’s Company
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Health, Safety and Environment Engineering
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717714
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRA) practices in a large-scale construction project, where complex activities, heavy machinery usage, and multiple stakeholders significantly increase occupational safety risks. The research focuses on identifying gaps between established safety standards and their actual implementation on site, with the aim of improving overall safety performance and compliance with occupational health and safety frameworks. A mixed-method approach was used, combining site observations, structured interviews, document reviews, and quantitative risk assessment techniques across key construction activities such as excavation, earthwork, material handling, asphalt laying, and traffic management. The collected data were evaluated against international safety standards to assess deficiencies in hazard identification, risk evaluation, and control implementation. The gap analysis revealed several critical weaknesses, including incomplete hazard identification in high-risk operations, inadequate documentation of risk assessments, limited worker involvement in safety processes, and inconsistent application of the hierarchy of controls. The study also identified shortcomings in training effectiveness, safety communication, audit frequency, and monitoring systems. These deficiencies collectively increase the likelihood of accidents, injuries, and operational disruptions. To address these issues, the study recommends implementing a standardized HIRA framework, strengthening training programs, integrating safety planning into project design and scheduling, and enhancing continuous monitoring and auditing mechanisms. The adoption of digital tools for real-time risk assessment and improved reporting systems is also suggested to support proactive hazard management. Overall, the study highlights that systematic gap analysis is a valuable method for evaluating and improving safety management systems in construction. By aligning current practices with established standards, organizations can significantly enhance workplace safety, reduce risks, and promote a stronger safety culture within construction projects.
References
[1] Emplacement Gantry Gap Analysis Study”, Bechtel Saic Company LLC, May 2005.
[2] Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure, 2008, University of western Sydney, \
[3] Management System Manual”,Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[4] Procedure for Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control”, JH Construction Company.
[5] Procedure for Hazard Monitoring and Action”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[6] “Procedure for Significant Aspect Identification”, Limited, Mumbai, 2006. JH Construction Company
[7] “Procedure for Monitoring, Measurement and Analysis of the Data”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[8] “Procedure for Preparation of Objectives and Targets”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[9] Procedure for Environmental Performance Assessment”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[10] Khan, F. I. and Abbasi, S. A., (2001), Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 14, pp. 43-59.
[11] Frank, T., Brooks, S., Creekmore, R., Hasselbalch, B., Murray, K., Obeng, K., Reich, S. and Sanchez, E., (2008), Quality Risk Management Principles and Construction Industry Case Studies, pp. 1-9.
[12] Dziubinski, M., Fratczak, M. and Markowski, A. S., (2006), Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 19, pp 399-408.
[13] Frank, T., Brooks, S., Creekmore, R., Hasselbalch, B., Murray, K., Obeng, K., Reich, S. and Sanchez, E., (2008), Quality Risk Management Principles and Construction Industry Case Studies, pp. 1-9.
[14] “Safety and Environmental Management System – ISO 14001 & OHSAS 18001 GAP Analysis”, National Energy Board, 2002.
[15] Sami Karna.: “Analyzing Customer Satisfaction and Quality in Construction – The Case of Public and Private Customer”, Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, Special Series, Vol. 2
[16] Procedure for Finalizing and Periodic Review of OH&S Objectives”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[17] Procedure for Performance Measurement and Monitoring”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[18] Procedure for Accident / Incidents Investigation”, Construction Company Limited, Mumbai, 2006.
[19] (2004).
[20] “The Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure GAP Analysis”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
[21] Web Sites:
[22] www.epa.gov/safewater
[23] www.google
How to cite this paper
@article{1717714,
author = {Md Gheyasuddin, Gulab Sahu, Ajay Kumar Gupta},
title = {Gap Analysis of Hazard identification & Risk Assessment (HIRA) System for JH Construction and Engineer’s Company},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {1663-1677},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717714.pdf},
abstract = {This study examines the effectiveness of Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRA) practices in a large-scale construction project, where complex activities, heavy machinery usage, and multiple stakeholders significantly increase occupational safety risks. The research focuses on identifying gaps between established safety standards and their actual implementation on site, with the aim of improving overall safety performance and compliance with occupational health and safety frameworks. A mixed-method approach was used, combining site observations, structured interviews, document reviews, and quantitative risk assessment techniques across key construction activities such as excavation, earthwork, material handling, asphalt laying, and traffic management. The collected data were evaluated against international safety standards to assess deficiencies in hazard identification, risk evaluation, and control implementation. The gap analysis revealed several critical weaknesses, including incomplete hazard identification in high-risk operations, inadequate documentation of risk assessments, limited worker involvement in safety processes, and inconsistent application of the hierarchy of controls. The study also identified shortcomings in training effectiveness, safety communication, audit frequency, and monitoring systems. These deficiencies collectively increase the likelihood of accidents, injuries, and operational disruptions. To address these issues, the study recommends implementing a standardized HIRA framework, strengthening training programs, integrating safety planning into project design and scheduling, and enhancing continuous monitoring and auditing mechanisms. The adoption of digital tools for real-time risk assessment and improved reporting systems is also suggested to support proactive hazard management. Overall, the study highlights that systematic gap analysis is a valuable method for evaluating and improving safety management systems in construction. By aligning current practices with established standards, organizations can significantly enhance workplace safety, reduce risks, and promote a stronger safety culture within construction projects.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717714}
}