Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717753
Inclusive Leadership and Workforce Diversity Management Predicting Innovative Work Behaviour in Multigenerational Organisations: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Opinion-Based Framework
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717753
Abstract
This conceptual paper examines the theoretical relationship between Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour in the context of multigenerational organisations operating across emerging and developed economies. Drawing on Social Identity Theory (SIT), Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory, and Organisational Learning Theory (OLT), the paper argues that organisations in which leaders embody and enact inclusive practices — characterised by openness, accessibility, and availability— are systematically better positioned to generate, promote, and implement innovative ideas across a generationally diverse workforce. The paper contends that inclusive leadership functions as a structural antecedent to innovative work behaviour, and that this relationship is conditioned by three critical organisational mediators: equal opportunity practices, intergenerational collaboration, and diversity training. While the transformative potential of inclusive leadership is affirmed, the paper acknowledges that its efficacy is not uniform — it is moderated by generational dynamics, organisational culture, and institutional context. The paper advances a conceptual framework, proposes empirically testable hypotheses, and contributes to both theoretical scholarship and practical leadership development.
Keywords
Inclusive Leadership, Innovative Work Behaviour, Workforce Diversity, Multigenerational Organisations, Equal Opportunity, Intergenerational Collaboration, Diversity Training, Emerging Economies
References
[1] Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.
[2] Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
[3] Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge.Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137.
[4] Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Addison-Wesley.
[5] Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99.
[6] Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
[7] Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
[8] Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227-1274.
[9] Biggs, S., Carr, A., & Haapala, I. (2017). Workplace identity and the older worker. In K. S. Shulz & G. A. Adams (Eds.), Aging and Work in the 21st Century (2nd ed., pp. 119-142). Routledge.
[10] Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
[11] Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organisational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(6), 931-944.
[12] Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2017). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375-394.
[13] Crossan, M. M., Maurer, C. C., & White, R. E. (2011). Reflections on the 2009 AMR decade award: Do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 446-460.
[14] De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
[15] Deal, J. J., & Levenson, A. (2016). What millennials want from work: How to maximize engagement in today's workforce. McGraw-Hill.
[16] Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behaviour and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
[17] Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
[18] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
[19] Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2013). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186.
[20] Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1104-1120.
[21] Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work (pp. 63-80). Wiley.
[22] Finkelstein, L. M., Truxillo, D. M., Fraccaroli, F., & Kanfer, R. (Eds.). (2015). Facing the challenges of a multi-age workforce: A use-inspired approach. Routledge.
[23] Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165-180.
[24] Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113-165.
[25] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
[26] Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716-749.
[27] Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2015). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge.
[28] Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 123-143.
[29] Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
[30] Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129-145.
[31] Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(4), 554-571.
[32] Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2011). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392-414.
[33] Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617.
[34] Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
[35] King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. Thomson Learning.
[36] Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008). Diversity initiative effectiveness: What organizations can and cannot expect from diversity recruitment, diversity training, and formal mentoring programs. In A. P. Brief (Ed.), Diversity at Work (pp. 265-317). Cambridge University Press.
[37] Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139-S157.
[38] Lyons, S. T., Urick, M., Kuron, L., & Schweitzer, L. (2019). Generational differences in the workplace: There is complexity beyond the stereotypes. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(3), 300-322.
[39] Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
[40] Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). Inclusion is the key to diversity management, but what is inclusion?Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 83-88.
[41] Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
[42] Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966.
[43] Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535.
[44] North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2015). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 993-1021.
[45] Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.
[46] Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53-79.
[47] Qi, L., & Liu, B. (2017). Effects of inclusive leadership on employee voice behaviour and team performance: The mediating role of caring ethical climate. Frontiers in Communication, 2, 8.
[48] Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190-203.
[49] Roberson, Q., Ryan, A. M., & Ragins, B. R. (2017). The evolution and future of diversity at work.Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 483-499.
[50] Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Leadership and generations at work: A critical review. Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 44-57.
[51] Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
[52] Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Revised ed.). Doubleday.
[53] Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262-1289.
[54] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin &S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
[55] Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 251-282.
[56] Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
[57] Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of Organizational Creativity (2nd ed.).Academic Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1717753,
author = {Chika Omukpai PhD, Collins, Vincent Tamunoseipriye},
title = {Inclusive Leadership and Workforce Diversity Management Predicting Innovative Work Behaviour in Multigenerational Organisations: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {4533-4543},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717753.pdf},
abstract = {This conceptual paper examines the theoretical relationship between Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour in the context of multigenerational organisations operating across emerging and developed economies. Drawing on Social Identity Theory (SIT), Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory, and Organisational Learning Theory (OLT), the paper argues that organisations in which leaders embody and enact inclusive practices — characterised by openness, accessibility, and availability— are systematically better positioned to generate, promote, and implement innovative ideas across a generationally diverse workforce. The paper contends that inclusive leadership functions as a structural antecedent to innovative work behaviour, and that this relationship is conditioned by three critical organisational mediators: equal opportunity practices, intergenerational collaboration, and diversity training. While the transformative potential of inclusive leadership is affirmed, the paper acknowledges that its efficacy is not uniform — it is moderated by generational dynamics, organisational culture, and institutional context. The paper advances a conceptual framework, proposes empirically testable hypotheses, and contributes to both theoretical scholarship and practical leadership development.},
keywords = {Inclusive Leadership, Innovative Work Behaviour, Workforce Diversity, Multigenerational Organisations, Equal Opportunity, Intergenerational Collaboration, Diversity Training, Emerging Economies},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717753}
}