Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717893
Balancing Drug Control and Personal Liberty: A Critical Analysis of Section 37 NDPS Act
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Legal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717893
Abstract
The NDPS Act, 1985 was implemented to counteract the increasing threat of drug trafficking & substance abuse in India through a strict legal structure. Among it’s most debated provisions is Section 37, which enforces rigorous requirements for the granting of bail in situations involving commercial volumes of narcotic substances. This provision marks a notable divergence from conventional criminal law where bail is treated as the rule and jail as the exception. The stringent bail requirements under the NDPS Act have raised serious Constitutional issues pertaining to individual freedom, presumption of innocence, & the right to a fair and speedy trial guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The research critically examines the constitutional validity and judicial interpretation of Section 37 while analysing the tension between state interest in drug control & individual rights. It further evaluates the impact of prolonged undertrial detention and explores whether the stringent bail conditions satisfy the doctrine of proportionality. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need to balance effective drug enforcement with constitutional safeguards and procedural fairness.
Keywords
NDPS Act, Section 37, Bail Jurisprudence, Personal Liberty, Article 21, Presumption of Innocence, Constitutional Validity
How to cite this paper
@article{1717893,
author = {Aryan Mendiratta},
title = {Balancing Drug Control and Personal Liberty: A Critical Analysis of Section 37 NDPS Act},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {2709-2716},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717893.pdf},
abstract = {The NDPS Act, 1985 was implemented to counteract the increasing threat of drug trafficking & substance abuse in India through a strict legal structure. Among it’s most debated provisions is Section 37, which enforces rigorous requirements for the granting of bail in situations involving commercial volumes of narcotic substances. This provision marks a notable divergence from conventional criminal law where bail is treated as the rule and jail as the exception. The stringent bail requirements under the NDPS Act have raised serious Constitutional issues pertaining to individual freedom, presumption of innocence, & the right to a fair and speedy trial guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The research critically examines the constitutional validity and judicial interpretation of Section 37 while analysing the tension between state interest in drug control & individual rights. It further evaluates the impact of prolonged undertrial detention and explores whether the stringent bail conditions satisfy the doctrine of proportionality. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need to balance effective drug enforcement with constitutional safeguards and procedural fairness.},
keywords = {NDPS Act, Section 37, Bail Jurisprudence, Personal Liberty, Article 21, Presumption of Innocence, Constitutional Validity},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717893}
}