Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718062
Parametric Study on Seismic Response of Mid-Rise RCC Buildings and Impact of Irregularities on Seismic Performance of these Buildings in Bhutan
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Engineering
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I11-1718062
Abstract
The seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete (RCC) buildings is strongly influenced by structural irregularities, stiffness variation and overall building configuration. This research evaluates the seismic response of mid-rise RCC structures with different plan and vertical irregularities under earthquake conditions relevant to Bhutan. Structural models including regular, L-shaped and T-shaped buildings were analysed using Response Spectrum Analysis in ETABS according to IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 provisions. The effect of masonry infill walls was incorporated through equivalent diagonal strut modelling. Different structural cases, including soft-storey conditions, were examined to assess their influence on seismic performance. Important response parameters such as storey displacement, inter-storey drift, base shear and stiffness were compared for all models. The analysis showed that irregular structures are more vulnerable to seismic effects due to increased torsion and deformation demands, whereas infill walls improve stiffness and reduce lateral movement. The study emphasizes the need for proper seismic design and stiffness distribution in earthquake-resistant RCC buildings.
Keywords
Seismic Response, Structural Irregularity, Soft Storey, ETABS, Response Spectrum Analysis, Infill Walls.
References
[1] IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
[2] IS 456: 2000. Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
[3] IS 13920: 2016. Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
[4] IS 875 (Part 2):1987. Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures – Imposed Loads. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1987.
[5] IS 875 (Part 3):2015. Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures – Wind Loads. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2015.
[6] IS 4326:2013. Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2013.
[7] IS 875 (Part 1):1987. Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures – Dead Loads. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1987.
[8] Department of Engineering Services, MoWHS (2018). Bhutan Building Rules – Seismic Design Provisions.
[9] Murty, C. V. R., Goswami, R., Vijayanarayanan, A. R., & Mehta, V. V. (2012). Some Concepts in Earthquake Behaviour of Buildings.
[10] Chen, W. F., & Lui, E. M. (2005). Earthquake Engineering for Structural Design. CRC Press.
[11] P. Agarwal and M. Shrikhande, Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. New Delhi, India: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2006.
[12] Abd-Elhamed A, Mahmoud S, Alotaibi KS. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with different heights and floor systems. Sci Rep 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41656-7.
[13] Dogra N, Upadhyay A. A study on seismic wave impacts and structural response in mid-rise RCC buildings: A case-based ETABS analysis. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 2025;13(4). doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.68440.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718062,
author = {Kinga Wangdi, Dr. D. I. Narkhede},
title = {Parametric Study on Seismic Response of Mid-Rise RCC Buildings and Impact of Irregularities on Seismic Performance of these Buildings in Bhutan},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {3552-3557},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718062.pdf},
abstract = {The seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete (RCC) buildings is strongly influenced by structural irregularities, stiffness variation and overall building configuration. This research evaluates the seismic response of mid-rise RCC structures with different plan and vertical irregularities under earthquake conditions relevant to Bhutan. Structural models including regular, L-shaped and T-shaped buildings were analysed using Response Spectrum Analysis in ETABS according to IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 provisions. The effect of masonry infill walls was incorporated through equivalent diagonal strut modelling. Different structural cases, including soft-storey conditions, were examined to assess their influence on seismic performance. Important response parameters such as storey displacement, inter-storey drift, base shear and stiffness were compared for all models. The analysis showed that irregular structures are more vulnerable to seismic effects due to increased torsion and deformation demands, whereas infill walls improve stiffness and reduce lateral movement. The study emphasizes the need for proper seismic design and stiffness distribution in earthquake-resistant RCC buildings.},
keywords = {Seismic Response, Structural Irregularity, Soft Storey, ETABS, Response Spectrum Analysis, Infill Walls.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718062}
}