International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718164

1718164 Vol 9 · Issue 11 Download Paper

Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context

Samaila umar Kabiru Auduwa Aisha Ahmed Alkali

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Sustainability

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164

Abstract

The gap between design intent and real thermal conditions in buildings is well-documented, but its institutional and stakeholder aspects in public-sector architecture in hot-dry regions remain unexplored. This study examines passive cooling in public schools in Nigeria's Sahelian zone, analysing published case studies from many perspectives. The study investigates the competing logics of architects, public works authorities, and school users using secondary analysis of 32 carefully chosen case studies. The performance gap is caused by competing stakeholder logics, including officials' cost- and schedule-driven decisions, security policies embedded in institutional rules, and professional norms that equate "modern" with concrete. Institutional theory explains how coercive (procurement rules), mimetic (industry imitation), and normative (professional expectations) influences work together to maintain this disparity. This study presents the Institutionally Mediated Thermal Performance (IMTP) paradigm, which combines adaptive comfort, performance gap, and institutional theories to explain how these influences consistently change design results and limit occupant adaption. The article presents a stakeholder-centered analytical approach for analysing building performance in Global South contexts. Policy recommendations include implementing interim thermal compliance checkpoints during construction and changing procurement criteria to incorporate life-cycle cost analysis.

References

[1] Abba, H.Y., Abdul-Majid, R.B. and Ahmed, M.H. (2020). A review of thermal comfort studies in different building types in Nigeria. International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 7(2), pp.10-15.

[2] Abdulkareem, M., & Al-Maiyah, S. (2025). Improving the Thermal Environment of Abuja’s Affordable Housing Through Passive Design Solutions. Sustainability, 17(18), 8435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188435

[3] Abdullah, I. A., Salisu, A. S. and Dahiru, A. (2023) “Determining the Adaptive Thermal Comfort and Preference Votes of Children in Public Primary Schools in the Hot Semi-arid Climatic Zone of Nigeria”, Journal of Human Centered Technology, 2(2), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.11113/humentech. v2n2.48.

[4] Agada, L.E. and Yakubu, M.S. (2022) “HEAT WAVE AND ITS IMPACT IN NORTHEASTERN NIGERIA: A CASE STUDY OF YOBE STATE, NIGERIA”, FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 6(1), pp. 232–239. doi:10.33003/fjs-2022-0601-893.

[5] Agyekum, Kofi & Dompey, Annabel & Pittri, Hayford & Botchway, Edward. (2023). Design for Maintainability (DfM) Implementation Among Design Professionals: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country Context. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 43. 10.1108/IJBPA-06-2023-0078.

[6] Banjo, A. V., Daramola, S. A., Ajayi, O. O., & Odefadehan, C. T. (2025). Performance Evaluation of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEBs) vs. Conventional Building Materials in Nigeria: Multi-Criteria Analysis: Cost, Durability, Thermal Comfort & Environmental Sustainability. Engineering Research Journal, 5(4), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18119304

[7] Batagarawa, Amina & Baba, Huraira. (2022). Keeping Cool Under the Hot Arewa Sun: Natural Cooling Systems in Traditional Hausa Architecture of Nigeria. 10.1007/978-3-031-04714-5_7.

[8] Bordass, B. and Leaman, A. (2013) ‘A new professionalism: remedy or fantasy?’, Building Research & Information, 41(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.750572.

[9] Bordass, B., Cohen, R., Standeven, M. and Leaman, A. (2001) 'Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings', Building Research & Information, 29(2), pp. 114–128.

[10] Bowen, Glenn. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9. 27-40. 10.3316/QRJ0902027.

[11] Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[12] Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

[13] de Dear, Richard & Brager, Gail & D., Cooper. (1997). Developing an Adaptive Model of Thermal Comfort and Preference - Final Report on RP-884.. ASHRAE Transactions. 104.

[14] DiMaggio, Paul & Powell, Walter. (2000). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Isomorphism in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review. 48. 147-160. 10.2307/2095101.

[15] Dmochowski, Z. R. & Nigeria. National Commission for Museums and Monuments. (1990) An introduction to Nigerian traditional architecture. London: Ethnographica in Association with the National Commission for Museums and Monuments.

[16] Dosio, Alessandro. (2017). Projection of temperature and heat waves for Africa with an ensemble of CORDEX Regional Climate Models. Climate Dynamics. 49. 10.1007/s00382-016-3355-5.

[17] Fry, M. and Drew, J. (1964) Tropical Architecture in the Dry and Humid Zones. London: Batsford.

[18] Givoni, B. (1998) Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

[19] Indraganti, Madhavi. (2010). Adaptive use of natural ventilation for thermal comfort in Indian apartments. Building and Environment. 45. 1490-1507. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.013.

[20] Janda, Kathryn. (2011). Buildings don't use energy: People do. Architectural Science Review. 54. 15-22. 10.3763/asre.2009.0050. Janda, K. B. (2011). Buildings don’t use energy: people do. Architectural Science Review, 54(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.3763/ASRE.2009.0050

[21] Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. (2015) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th Edition, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 252 p. Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. (2015) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

[22] Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

[23] Leaman, A. and Bordass, B. (2001) 'Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe occupant surveys and their implications', Building Research & Information, 29(2), pp. 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008045

[24] Leaman, Adrian & Bordass, Bill. (2007). Are users more tolerant of 'green' buildings? Building Research and Information. 35. 662-673. 10.1080/09613210701529518.

[25] Makinde, Olusola & Alabi, Olugbenga & Makinde, Olubukunmi & Kunle, Abdulrasaq & Abdulrasaq kunle, Ayinla. (2024). Performance Evaluation Criteria for Nigerian Government Buildings: A Case Study of Kwara State Secretariat Buildings. International Journal of Islamic Architecture. 13. 5-24. 10.30495/ijaud.2024.73185.1684.

[26] Menezes, A.C., Cripps, A., Bouchlaghem, D. and Buswell, R. (2012) 'Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non‑domestic buildings: using post‑occupancy evaluation to reduce the performance gap', Applied Energy, 97, pp. 355-364.

[27] Meuser, P. and Dalbai, A. (eds) (2021) Architectural Guide Sub-Saharan Africa. Berlin: DOM Publishers.

[28] Nicol, James & Humphreys, Michael. (2002). Adaptive Thermal Comfort and Sustainable Thermal Standards for Buildings. Energy and Buildings. 34. 563-572. 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3.

[29] Nwankwo, Steve & Nwankwo, Chidiuto. (2025). Post-occupancy evaluation of public and private building architectural design performance in the tropical rainforest climate of Owerri, Southern Nigeria. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 156. 10.1007/s00704-025-05686-7.

[30] Oyedele, Lukumon & Tham, K.. (2005). Examining architects' performance in Nigerian private and public sectors building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 12. 52-68. 10.1108/09699980510576899.

[31] Preiser, W.F.E. and Vischer, J.C. (2005) Assessing Building Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

[32] Rababa, Barah; Cockbill, Stuart; Roberts, Ben M (2025). Bridging the gap: co-designing passive cooling futures with UK households. Loughborough University. Conference contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/29438480.v1

[33] Rimamtanung, W.Y. and Charles, M. (2023) 'Barriers to implementing sustainable design strategies for energy efficiency in buildings in Nigeria', Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Research, p. 70.

How to cite this paper

Samaila umar, Kabiru Auduwa, Aisha Ahmed Alkali "Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 11 2026 Page 3855-3863 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164
Samaila umar, Kabiru Auduwa, Aisha Ahmed Alkali "Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164
Samaila umar, Kabiru Auduwa, Aisha Ahmed Alkali (2026). Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(11). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164
Samaila umar, Kabiru Auduwa, Aisha Ahmed Alkali "Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164
@article{1718164,
      author = {Samaila umar, Kabiru Auduwa, Aisha Ahmed Alkali},
      title = {Rethinking the Building Performance Gap: A Multi‑Perspective Stakeholder Analysis of Passive Cooling in Nigeria’s Sahelian School Context},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {3855-3863},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718164.pdf},
      abstract = {The gap between design intent and real thermal conditions in buildings is well-documented, but its institutional and stakeholder aspects in public-sector architecture in hot-dry regions remain unexplored. This study examines passive cooling in public schools in Nigeria's Sahelian zone, analysing published case studies from many perspectives. The study investigates the competing logics of architects, public works authorities, and school users using secondary analysis of 32 carefully chosen case studies. The performance gap is caused by competing stakeholder logics, including officials' cost- and schedule-driven decisions, security policies embedded in institutional rules, and professional norms that equate "modern" with concrete. Institutional theory explains how coercive (procurement rules), mimetic (industry imitation), and normative (professional expectations) influences work together to maintain this disparity. This study presents the Institutionally Mediated Thermal Performance (IMTP) paradigm, which combines adaptive comfort, performance gap, and institutional theories to explain how these influences consistently change design results and limit occupant adaption. The article presents a stakeholder-centered analytical approach for analysing building performance in Global South contexts. Policy recommendations include implementing interim thermal compliance checkpoints during construction and changing procurement criteria to incorporate life-cycle cost analysis.},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718164}
  }