Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718185
Relationship between Teacher Characteristics and ICT Competence in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Enugu, Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718185
Abstract
Adaptation to technological and digital tools in teaching is a worrisome situation in Nigerian education sector despite the advancement and development of technology in the country. This study investigated the relationship between biology teacher characteristics and ICT competence in Enugu Education Zone. One (1) research question and three (3) null hypotheses guided the study which was tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted the descriptive survey research design. The entire 105 public and 151 private biology teachers in Enugu Education zone were investigated given the total number of 256 biology teachers. The main instrument; structured questionnaire was validated and the reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach Alpha, which yielded 0.849 showing high reliability. The research question was answered using mean and standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). In conclusion, this study's findings suggest that ICT competence among teachers is not significantly influenced by gender, years of teaching experience, or type of school. The absence of significant differences across these variables implies that ICT training and professional development should focus on individual teacher needs, rather than demographic characteristics, schools and policy makers should prioritize inclusive, equitable ICT integration strategies, future research should explore other factors influencing ICT competence, such as teacher motivation, school culture, and resource availability.
References
[1] Abe, T.O. and Gbenro, S.O. (2014). A Comparison of students’ attitudinal variables towards mathematics between private and public senior secondary schools. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research, 1(1), 32-39.
[2] Adeoye, I. A., Adanikin, A. F. & Adanikin, A. (2020). COVID-19 and E-learning: Nigeria Tertiary Education System Experience. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 5 (5), 2454-6194.
[3] Adelakun, I.S., (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Nigerian Education System: Impacts, Management, Response, and Way Forward. International Technology and science (Education Journal), 3 (4), 2617-4588.
[4] Abdu-Raheem (2012). Gender Differences and Students’ Academic Achievement and Retention in Biology among Senior Secondary Schools in Ekiti State.European Journal of education Studies 4(1):45-58.
[5] Alea, A., AlDahdouh, A., Antonio, O. J. & Caires, S. (2015). Understanding Knowledge Network, Learning and connectivism. International Journal of Technology and Distance Learning. 12 (10): 3-21.doi: 10.5281/zenodo.46186
[6] Albrahim, F.A. (2020). Online Teaching Skills and Competence. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET).19:1
[7] Al-Fudail, M. & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating Teacher Stress when using Technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004
[8] Ali, W.; Alea, L.A.; Fabrea, M.F.; Roldan, R.d.A. & farooqi, A.Z. (2020). Teacher’s COVID-19 Awareness, Distance Learning Education Experience and Perception Towards Institutional Readiness and challenges. International Journals of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 19(6). 127-144.
[9] Alwraikat, M. (2017). A Glimpse at International Technology Education Standards in higher Education institutions, International Journal of Instructional Technology Distance Learning, 8(5). https://doi.org/2014.10.
[10] Ayala, A.F. (2008). Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their Genotypes? Current Biology. Cambridge, MA; Cell Press: Cambridge.
[11] Avise, J.C and Ayla, F.J. (2010). In the light of evolution IV, the human Condition.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington,D.C: National Academy of sciences107 (suppl.): 8897-8901.
[12] Barnes, M. E. and Brownell, S. E. (2016). Practices and Perspectives of College Instructors on addressing Religious Beliefs when Teaching Evolution. Biology Education Research 15, 3-19.
[13] Bailie, J. L. (2011). Effective Online Instructional Competencies as Perceived by Online University Faculty and Students: A Sequel Study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 82-89.
[14] Baloran, T. E. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies of Students During COIVD-19 Pandemic, Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25:8, 635-642, Doi: 10.1080/15325024.2020.1769300
[15] Barlow, N. (2009). Darwin's Ornithological Notes". Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Historical Series. London; Trustees of the British Museum.2(7): 201-278.
[16] Beardsley, P.M, Bloom, M. V and Wise, S. B. (2012). Challenges and Opportunities for Teaching and Designing Effective K-12 Evolution Curricula. In. Binns, I. C. and Bloom, M. A. (2017). Recognizing Science from non-Science: Preservice Elementary Teacher’s Perspectives on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent design. 9201: 4-28.
[17] Berkman, M.B.; Pacheco, J.S and Platzer. (2008). Evolution and Creationism in Americans’Classrooms. A National portrait. PLOS bio. 6(5): e124. dio.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 006024.
[18] Binns, I. C. and Bloom, M. A. (2016). Recognizing science from non-science:
[19] Preservice elementary teachers’ perspectives on evolution, creationism, and intelligent design. Paper presented at the
[20] Branch, G. (2007). Understanding Creationism after kitzmiller. BioScience. Oxford: Oxford University press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Science. 57 (3): 278-284.
[21] Bowman, K. L. (2007). An Empirical study of Evolution, Creationism and Intelligent design instruction in public school. Michigan: Michigan State University Publication.
[22] Brickhouse, N. W., Father, Z. R, Letts, W. J. IV, and Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of Students' views about Evidence, Theory, and the interface between Science and Religion in an Astronomy Course. J Res Sci Teach 37, 340- 362.
[23] Bube, R. H. (2014). Man, Come of Age: Bonhoeffer’s Response to the God-of-the Gab. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. Louisville. KY: Evangelical Theological Society. 14(4): 203-220.
[24] Cleaves, A. and Toplis, R. (2007). In the shadow of Intelligent Design: the teaching of Evolution. Journal of Biological Education. 42, 1. pp.30-35.
[25] Cobern, W. W. (1994). Point: belief, understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 583-590.
[26] Cobern, W.W. (2015). Thinking about Science and Christian Orthodox Beliefs: a Survey of Perservice Elementary Teachers. Western Michigan University, Wood Hall Kalamazoo.
[27] Collie, R.J. &Martin, A.J. (2017). Teachers' sense of Adaptability: Examining Links with Perceived Autonomy support, Teachers' Psychological Functioning, and Students’ Numeracy Achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003
[28] Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in Biology makes sense Except in the Light of Evolution, AM Biol Teach 35, 125-129.
[29] Doolittle, W. F. (2000). Uprooting the Tree of life. Scientific American Stuttgart: American. Georg von Holtzbrinck Publishing Group.
[30] Draper, P. R. (2005). God, Science, and Naturalism. In. Wainwright, William J. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
[31] Ecklund, E. H. and Scheitle, C. P. (2007). Religion among Academic Scientists: Distinctions, Disciplines, and Demographics. Soc Probl 54, 289-307.
[32] Edeh, M.N.; Nwafor, C.E.; Obafemi, F.A.; Shuvro, S.; Atonye, F.G.…. Omar, A.A. (2020). Impact of Corornavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN 2222-288X. Vol II,13
[33] Emmons, N.A. and Kelemen, D. A. (2015). Young Children Acceptance of Within-species Variation: complications for Essentialism and Teaching Evolution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 148-160.
[34] Ezeudu, S.A. (2003). Classroom environment as correlate of students’ cognitive achievement in senior secondary school geography. The Journal of WCCI Nigeria chapter 4(2): 65-73.
[35] Gervais, W. M. (2015). Override the Controversy: Analytic Thinking Predicts Endorsement of Evolution. Cognition 142, 312- 321.
[36] Harris, S. (2020). How to Prevent Teacher Burnout during the Coronavirus Pandemic. The Conversation.https://theconversation.com/how-to-prevent-teacher-burnout-During-the- coronavirus-pandemic-139353
[37] Helsper, E. J., &Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503-520.
[38] Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. https://medicine.hofstra.edu/pdf/faculty/facdev/facdev-article
[39] Hermann, R. S. (2011). Breaking the Cycle of continued Evolution Education Controversy: On the need to Strengthen Elementary level Teaching of Evolution. Evolution: Education and outreach, 4, 267- 274.
[40] Hermann, R. S. (2012). Cognitive Apartheid: On the Manner in which High School Students Understand without believing in Evolution. Evol Educ Outreach 5, 619-628.
[41] Kini, T. & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of the Research Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Teaching_Experience
[42] Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
[43] Lawson, A. E. and Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about Evolution and Rejecting a Belief in special Creationism: Effect of Reflective Reasoning Skill, Prior, Knowledge, Prior Belief and Religious Commitment. J Res Sci Teach 29, 143-166.
[44] Levesque, P J. and Guillaume, A. M. (2010). Teachers, Evolution, and Religion: No Resolution in Sight. Review of Religious Research, 51, 349- 365.
[45] Manwaring, K. F., Jensen, J. L., Gill, R. A. and Bybee, S. M. (2015). Influencing highly Religious Undergraduate Perception of Evo: Mormons as a case study. Evol Educ Outreach 8, 23.
[46] Martins, J.L. (2003). What is Field Theory? American Journal of Sociology 109(1) 1-40
[47] Mbajiorgu, N. M. and Anidu, I. (2017). Non-western students’ causal reasoning about biologically adaptive changes in humans, other animals and plants: instructional and curricular implications. International Journal of Science Education, 39(9), 1133-1153.
[48] Mbajiorgu, N. M. and Udeh, V. (2015). Worldview and academic self- concept (ASC) as predictors of biology achievement among Nigerian Senior Secondary School students. Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria,50, 85-96.
[49] Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C and Okamoto, S. (2006). Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 313(5788):765-766.
[50] Neboh, O.I. (2009). Issues in Science Education. Enugu: Cheston Agency Press Ltd.
[51] Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y. & Sheppard, K., (2009). Academic Preparation in Biology and, Advocacy for Teaching Evolution: Biology Versus Non-Biology Teachers. Science Education, 93:1122 – 1146.
[52] Nisbet, M. (2005). Polling About Evolution: Low Information Public Underscores Importance of communication Strategy. www.csicop.org/list/listarchive/msq004.html
[53] Numbers, R. L. (2006). The Creationists: from Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[54] Odagboyi, I.A. (2015). The Effect of Gender on the Achievement of Students in Biology using the Jagsaw Method. Journal of education and Practice 6(170: 14-18.)
[55] Onyema, E.M. & Deborah, E. C. (2019). Potentials of Mobile Technologies in Enhancing the mEffectiveness of Inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Education (IJE), 2(1), 1– 25. https://doi.org/10.5121/IJE.2019.1421.
[56] Onyia Eze. G. U., Mbajiorgu,. N. & Neboh,. O. (2024). The Need for Remote Teaching Competence for Biology Teachers in Enugu education Zone as a Blue Print for Teaching During Emergency Situations for Sustainable Education. In D. Abonyi (Eds), proceeding of Annual International Conference on Innovative and Emerging Technology for Transformative Research and Sustainable Development (pp.1846- 1862). SPGS
[57] Onyia Eze,.G. U. & Mbajiorgu,. N. (2023). Conception about the Origin of Life among Senior Secondary School Biology students in Enugu Education zone. International Journal of Innovative science and Research Technology. 8(4) 2456-2165
[58] Pennock, R. T. (2007). How not to teach the controversy about creationism. In L. S. Jones and M. J. Reiss, eds.Teaching about scientific origins: taking account of creationism.pp.59-74. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
[59] Piaget, J. (1964). Development and Learning. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 2, 176-186.
[60] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
[61] Randy, M. (2004). The Evolution-Creationism Continuum in College Biology Classrooms. Minneapoils Minnesota: University of Minnesota Publication.
[62] Raven, P.H. and Johnson, G. B. (2009). Biology. (6th Edition). New York: Boston, MA; McGraw- Hill Companies, Inc.
[63] Rice, J. W, Olson, J. K. & Colbert, J. T. (2010). University evolution education: the effect of evolution instruction on biology majors’ content knowledge, attitude toward evolution, and theistic position. Evolution Education Outreach 4, 137–144.
[64] Rissler, L. J., Duncan, S. I. and Caruso, N. M. (2014). The Relative importance of Religion and Education on University Students' views of evolution in the Deep South and State Science Standards across the United States. Evol Educ Outreach 7, 24.
[65] Sinatra, G.M, Sutherland, S.A, McConaughy, F. and Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and Beliefs in Students' Understanding Acceptance of Biological Evolution. J Res Sci Teach 40, 510- 528.
[66] Šķietniece, I. (2020). Vai Mācības attālinātiietekmē izglītības kvalitāti? SkolasVārds, 14(179), 3-6. :///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Skolas_Vards
[67] Smith, M.U. (2009). Counterpoint: Belief, Understanding, and the Teaching of Evolution. Journal of Current status of Research in Teaching and Learning, Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues.SciEduc 19, 539- 571.
[68] Southerland S.A. and Scharmann L.C (2013). Acknowledging the religious beliefs students bring into the science classroom: using the bounded nature of science. Theory Pract52, 59–65.
[69] Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Sang, G. (2012). Identifying factors influencing teachers' adoption of ICT in the classroom. Educational Studies, 38(4), 517-528.
[70] UNESCO, (2020). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse.
[71] UNICEF Nigeria. (2020). Nigeria Education in Emergencies Working Group; Nigeria Education Sector COVID-19 Response Strategy in North East. https://covid19.ncdc.gov.ng
[72] World Health Organization. (2020) Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
[73] World Health Organization. (2020). Questions and Answers on Corona viruses. https://www.who.int/newsroom/q-a-detail/q-acoronaviruses
[74] World Health Organization. (2020) Summary of Probable SARS Cases with Onset of Illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/index.html
How to cite this paper
@article{1718185,
author = {Grace Ukamaka Onyia, Ngozika Mbajiorgu, Olive Neboh},
title = {Relationship between Teacher Characteristics and ICT Competence in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {4675-4692},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718185.pdf},
abstract = {Adaptation to technological and digital tools in teaching is a worrisome situation in Nigerian education sector despite the advancement and development of technology in the country. This study investigated the relationship between biology teacher characteristics and ICT competence in Enugu Education Zone. One (1) research question and three (3) null hypotheses guided the study which was tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted the descriptive survey research design. The entire 105 public and 151 private biology teachers in Enugu Education zone were investigated given the total number of 256 biology teachers. The main instrument; structured questionnaire was validated and the reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach Alpha, which yielded 0.849 showing high reliability. The research question was answered using mean and standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). In conclusion, this study's findings suggest that ICT competence among teachers is not significantly influenced by gender, years of teaching experience, or type of school. The absence of significant differences across these variables implies that ICT training and professional development should focus on individual teacher needs, rather than demographic characteristics, schools and policy makers should prioritize inclusive, equitable ICT integration strategies, future research should explore other factors influencing ICT competence, such as teacher motivation, school culture, and resource availability.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718185}
}