Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718221
AI-Generated Cartton on YouTube Kids: An Analysis on Pacing, Sensory Intensity and Toddler Attention
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Journalism and Mass Communication
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718221
Abstract
Since the recent boom in AI, there has been a rapid use and generation of various types of AI content all across different digital platforms. One area where this is seemed to take a majority control over is cartoon. Majority of the audience have seen ai-generated cartoon of cats and ducks similarly, cartoon for toddlers has seen a huge surge of ai-generated cartoon. Compare to traditional cartoons which the previous generation have grew up on, the AI cartoons are fast paced, employ highly-saturated colors, have quick fast cuts and most of them seem to have continuation error or distortion, all to sustain attention. Such a shift in how content for toddlers is created has brought a drastic change in their behavior. Where cartoons used to be something played in the background for a limited time, it’s now had the toddler glued to the screen and parents have noticed their toddlers being more aggressive and unsettled once such cartoons are turned off. Despite this drastic shift, limited study has been done on how these ai-cartoons negatively affect the toddler’s cognitive development and disrupts and shortens their attention span. This research paper aims to address this issue through a qualitative analysis for which 15 AI- generated cartoon clips have been selected from YouTube Kids to study the characteristics of AI cartoons and examining how such content exceeds a toddler’s processing abilities. This research aims to highlight the implications and encourage to being more focus on development appropriate media for children.
Keywords
AI- Generated Cartoon, YouTube Kids, Pacing, Visual intensity, Toddler Attention
References
[1] Akhter, R., Islam, A. S., & Ward, K. B. (2005). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Domestic Violence Against Women in Bangladesh. National Library of Medicine, 146(3644), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3644.668
[2] Alpuğan, Z. (2024). NAVIGATING THE DIGITAL LANDSCAPE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF DIGITAL MEDIA’S IMPACT ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT. NişAntaşI
[3] ÜNiversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/NişAntaşI ÜNiversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 572– 592. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1481354
[4] Aso, K., Watanabe, K., Negoro, T., Haga, Y., Kito, M., Maeda, N., & Ohki, T. (1994). Photosensitive epilepsy in children. Seizure, 3(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1059- 1311(05)80165-7
[5] Barr, R., Lauricella, A., Zack, E., & Calvert, S. L. (2010). Infant and Early Childhood Exposure to Adult-Directed and Child-Directed Television Programming: Relations with Cognitive Skills at Age Four. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0038
[6] Bogue, R. (2024, November 22). Book Review-Stolen Focus: Why You Can’t Pay Attention – And How to Think Deeply Again. Thor Projects. Retrieved April 1, 2026, from https://thorprojects.com/2024/11/22/book-review-stolen-focus-why-you-cant-pay-attention-and- how-to-think-deeply-again/
[7] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[8] Chase, W. P. (1937). Color vision in infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 203– 222. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060462
[9] Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA. (n.d.). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27987374/
[10] Christakis, D. A. (2011). The effects of Fast-Paced cartoons. PEDIATRICS, 128(4), 772–774. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2071
[11] Colombo, J. (2001). The development of visual attention in infancy. In Annual Reviews, Annu. Rev. Psychol. (pp. 337–367).
[12] Coyne, S. M., Shawcroft, J., Gale, M., Gentile, D. A., Etherington, J. T., Holmgren, H., & Stockdale, L. (2021). Tantrums, toddlers and technology: Temperament, media emotion regulation, and problematic media use in early childhood. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106762
[13] Dionne-Dostie, E., Paquette, N., Lassonde, M., & Gallagher, A. (2015). Multisensory integration and child neurodevelopment. Brain Sciences, 5(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci5010032
[14] Fan, L., Lu, M., Qi, X., & Xin, J. (2022). Do animations impair executive function in young children? Effects of animation types on the executive function of children aged four to seven years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158962
[15] Geist, E., & Gibson, M. (2000). The effect of network and public television programs on four and five year olds’ ability to attend to educational tasks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 250. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ628323
[16] Holesinger, N., & Oguine, O. C. (2026). Growing Up in Hyper-Speed: A Systematic review of Fast-Paced media and executive function in early Childhood. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6046334
[17] Kirvelis, D., & Vanagas, V. (2014). E. N. Sokolov’s Neural Model of Stimuli as Neuro- cybernetic Approach to Anticipatory Perception. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1600.2567
[18] Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1987). Shifts in Selective Visual Attention: Towards the Underlying Neural Circuitry. National Library of Medicine, 4(4), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 009-3833-5_5
[19] Kostyrka‐Allchorne, K., Cooper, N. R., & Simpson, A. (2016). Touchscreen generation: children’s current media use, parental supervision methods and attitudes towards contemporary media. Acta Paediatrica, 106(4), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13707
[20] Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
[21] Leckey, S., Gonzales, C., Selmeczy, D., & Ghetti, S. (2024). Toddlers’ visual exploration during decisions predicts uncertainty monitoring 1 year later. Child Development, 96(1), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14174
[22] Levin, S. R., & Anderson, D. R. (1976). The development of attention. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01391.x
[23] Li, P. H., & Lee, J. C. (2025). AI, Brain, and Child: navigating the intersection of artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and child development. AI Brain and Child, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00004-4
[24] Lillard, A. S., & Peterson, J. (2011). The immediate impact of different types of television on young children’s executive function. PEDIATRICS, 128(4), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1919
[25] McCollum, J. F., Jr, & Bryant, J. (2003). Pacing in children’s television programming. Mass Communication & Society, 6(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0602_1
[26] Mehmet‐Radji, O. (2004). Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children. Child Care Health and Development, 30(5), 559–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2214.2004.00456_4.x
[27] Namazi, S. A., & Sadeghi, S. (2024). The immediate impacts of TV programs on preschoolers’ executive functions and attention: a systematic review. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01738-1
[28] Neugnot-Cerioli, M., Muss Laurenty, O., & everyone.ai. (n.d.). The Future of Child Development in the AI Era: Cross-Disciplinary perspectives between AI and child development experts. https://everyone.ai/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/EveryoneAI.ResearchPaper.pdf
[29] Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516
[30] Richards, J. E. (2010). The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: Behavioral and psychophysiological measures. Developmental Review, 30(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.005
[31] Scheirer, J., Picard, R., & Cantrell, A. (2025). Personalized Animations for Affective Feedback: Generative AI Helps to Visualize Skin Conductance. ACM Digital Library, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1145/3746270.3760237
[32] Simmering, V. R., & Wood, C. M. (2017). The development of real-time stability supports visual working memory performance: Young children’s feature binding can be improved through perceptual structure. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1474–1493. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000358
[33] Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
[34] Troop-Gordon, W., Gordon, R. D., Vogel-Ciernia, L., Lee, E. E., & Visconti, K. J. (2016). Visual attention to dynamic scenes of ambiguous provocation and children’s aggressive behavior.
[35] Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(6), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1138412
[36] Vasilev, M. R., Parmentier, F. B., & Kirkby, J. A. (2020). Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(5), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820982267
[37] Veale, R., Hafed, Z. M., & Yoshida, M. (2017). How is visual salience computed in the brain? Insights from behaviour, neurobiology and modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 372(1714), 20160113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0113
[38] Wright, J. C., & Huston, A. C. (1983). A matter of form: Potentials of television for young viewers. American Psychologist, 38(7), 835–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.38.7.835
[39] Wu, T. (2016). The attention merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads. National Geographic Books.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718221,
author = {Pritpal Kaur, Dr. Bhargavi D. Hemmige},
title = {AI-Generated Cartton on YouTube Kids: An Analysis on Pacing, Sensory Intensity and Toddler Attention},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {4191-4219},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718221.pdf},
abstract = {Since the recent boom in AI, there has been a rapid use and generation of various types of AI content all across different digital platforms. One area where this is seemed to take a majority control over is cartoon. Majority of the audience have seen ai-generated cartoon of cats and ducks similarly, cartoon for toddlers has seen a huge surge of ai-generated cartoon. Compare to traditional cartoons which the previous generation have grew up on, the AI cartoons are fast paced, employ highly-saturated colors, have quick fast cuts and most of them seem to have continuation error or distortion, all to sustain attention. Such a shift in how content for toddlers is created has brought a drastic change in their behavior. Where cartoons used to be something played in the background for a limited time, it’s now had the toddler glued to the screen and parents have noticed their toddlers being more aggressive and unsettled once such cartoons are turned off. Despite this drastic shift, limited study has been done on how these ai-cartoons negatively affect the toddler’s cognitive development and disrupts and shortens their attention span. This research paper aims to address this issue through a qualitative analysis for which 15 AI- generated cartoon clips have been selected from YouTube Kids to study the characteristics of AI cartoons and examining how such content exceeds a toddler’s processing abilities. This research aims to highlight the implications and encourage to being more focus on development appropriate media for children.},
keywords = {AI- Generated Cartoon, YouTube Kids, Pacing, Visual intensity, Toddler Attention},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718221}
}