Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718304
Framing Effects of Political Advertising on Electoral Decision-Making: Evidence from the Ondo State Governorship Election
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Political Advertising & Voter Behavior
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I10-1718304
Abstract
This study evaluates how the framing of political advertising shapes voter perceptions and choices in a sub-national Nigerian election. Drawing on framing theory (Entman, 1993) and the agenda-setting framework (McCombs & Shaw, 1972), and considering media literacy/political efficacy as moderating factors (Scheufele & Nisbet, 2012), we analyse campaign communication during the Ondo State governorship election. A mixed-methods design combined quantitative content analysis of 120 print advertisements across four newspapers with a survey of 400 registered voters spanning the state’s three senatorial districts. Intercoder reliability for content coding was substantial (κ = 0.81). Regression models indicate that exposure to reform-oriented, experienced-leader, and outsider/challenger frames significantly predicted issue prioritization and candidate evaluations, while negative and emotive appeals increased recall but had mixed effects on trust. Interaction tests show that voters with higher political efficacy and media literacy were less susceptible to manipulative framing, highlighting the buffering function of literacy. The findings extend African political communication scholarship by demonstrating the potency of framing in sub-national contests and underscore implications for advertising regulation, media ethics, and voter education. We recommend stricter enforcement of advertising standards, integrating media literacy into civic curricula, and newsroom commitments to fact-checking campaign claims.
Keywords
Political Advertising, Framing; Agenda-Setting, Media Literacy, Electoral Decision-Making, Ondo State, Nigeria
References
[1] Adeniran, R. (2020). Fact-checking in Nigeria: Opportunities and challenges for verification in election coverage. African Journalism Studies, 41(4), 45–63. doi.org
[2] Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria. (2022). Advertising Standards of Practice (ASOP). arcon.gov.ng
[3] Akinfemisoye, M. O. (2020). Media framing of the 2019 Nigerian presidential election. African Journalism Studies, 41(2), 45–62. doi.org
[4] Asunka, J., Brierley, S., Golden, M., Kramon, E., & Ofosu, G. (2019). Electoral fraud or violence: The effect of observers on party manipulation strategies. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 129–151. doi.org
[5] Beam, M. A. (2014). Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41(8), 1019–1041. doi.org
[6] Bleck, J., & Van de Walle, N. (2018). Electoral politics in Africa since 1990: Continuity in change. Cambridge University Press. doi.org
[7] Bossetta, M. (2018). A framework for Facebook political campaigning: A fourfold typology of political actors and content. Political Communication, 35(2), 232–247. doi.org
[8] Bratton, M., Bhavnani, R., & Chen, T.-H. (2012). Voting intentions in Africa: Ethnic, economic or partisan? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 50(1), 27–52. doi.org
[9] Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., & Willis, J. (2020). The moral economy of elections in Africa: Democracy, voting and virtue. Cambridge University Press. doi.org
[10] Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. doi.org
[11] Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi.org
[12] Gichohi, P. M. (2021). Digital campaigning and the 2017 Kenyan elections: Platforms, practices and policies. Journal of African Media Studies, 13(2), 247–264. doi.org
[13] Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
[14] Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi.org
[15] Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209. doi.org
[16] McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi.org
[17] Ndlela, N., & Mano, W. (Eds.). (2020). Social media and elections in Africa, volume 1: Theoretical perspectives and country studies. Palgrave Macmillan. doi.org
[18] Nigerian Broadcasting Commission. (2023). Nigeria Broadcasting Code (6th ed., as amended). nbc.gov.ng
[19] Ojebode, A. (2013). Rhetoric of campaign advertising in Nigeria’s 2011 elections. Journal of African Elections, 12(2), 101–121. doi.org
[20] Okoro, N., & Santas, T. (2017). An appraisal of the use of social media for political advertising in the 2015 Nigerian general elections. African Research Review, 11(1), 188–201. doi.org
[21] Olorunnisola, A. A., & Opara, E. (2020). Political communication and voter behavior in Nigeria. Journal of African Media Studies, 12(1), 33–50. doi.org
[22] Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. doi.org
[23] Reuters Institute. (2024). Digital News Report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
[24] Resnick, D. (2019). The politics of crackdowns: Protests, repression, and authoritarian survival in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 52(8), 1167–1202. doi.org
[25] Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. C. (2012). Being a citizen in the digital age: New media and civic engagement in the 2008 U.S. election. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 155–169. doi.org
[26] Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). SPJ code of ethics. spj.org
[27] Strömbäck, J., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediated and moderated effects of campaign advertising: News coverage, information processing, and political cognition. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(2), 174–197. doi.org
[28] Stremlau, N., Gagliardone, I., & Nkrumah, B. (2018). Elections and the media in Africa: Reflections and implications for policy. Journal of African Media Studies, 10(1), 17–33. doi.org
[29] Uzochukwu, C. E., Yartey, D. K., & Ojebuyi, B. R. (2018). Use of social media in political communication in Nigeria. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism, 8(3), 1–8. doi.org
[30] Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2019). News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(5), 647–664. doi.org
[31] Voltmer, K. (2013). The media in transitional democracies. Polity.
[32] Ward, S. J. A. (2015). The invention of journalism ethics (2nd ed.). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718304,
author = {Adedowole, I. F},
title = {Framing Effects of Political Advertising on Electoral Decision-Making: Evidence from the Ondo State Governorship Election},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {6},
number = {10},
pages = {1176-1182},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718304.pdf},
abstract = {This study evaluates how the framing of political advertising shapes voter perceptions and choices in a sub-national Nigerian election. Drawing on framing theory (Entman, 1993) and the agenda-setting framework (McCombs & Shaw, 1972), and considering media literacy/political efficacy as moderating factors (Scheufele & Nisbet, 2012), we analyse campaign communication during the Ondo State governorship election. A mixed-methods design combined quantitative content analysis of 120 print advertisements across four newspapers with a survey of 400 registered voters spanning the state’s three senatorial districts. Intercoder reliability for content coding was substantial (κ = 0.81). Regression models indicate that exposure to reform-oriented, experienced-leader, and outsider/challenger frames significantly predicted issue prioritization and candidate evaluations, while negative and emotive appeals increased recall but had mixed effects on trust. Interaction tests show that voters with higher political efficacy and media literacy were less susceptible to manipulative framing, highlighting the buffering function of literacy. The findings extend African political communication scholarship by demonstrating the potency of framing in sub-national contests and underscore implications for advertising regulation, media ethics, and voter education. We recommend stricter enforcement of advertising standards, integrating media literacy into civic curricula, and newsroom commitments to fact-checking campaign claims.},
keywords = {Political Advertising, Framing; Agenda-Setting, Media Literacy, Electoral Decision-Making, Ondo State, Nigeria},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I10-1718304}
}