International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718316

1718316 Vol 2 · Issue 11 Download Paper

Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery

Onyinyechi Isima

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Project Failure Analysis & Management

DOI: 10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316

Abstract

Project failure is a recurring problem all over the world. Both developed and developing countries are at risk of it. Even though there have been improvements in the ways of managing projects and the tools used to do so; many projects still do not meet the expected goals almost in terms of cost, time, scope, and quality. This paper focuses on the main reasons behind the failure of projects and constructs a theory for figuring out the most critical missing elements in project execution. Using a quantitative method, the study surveyed project management professionals to identify critical gaps in project delivery, relating from different industries to project management failures. Results show that factors such as communication failure, mis-estimation of project goals, neglecting risk management procedures, and lack of proper funding to name a few are the most frequent reasons of project failure. Besides, project outcomes are also highly dependent on organizational culture, governance structures, and external environmental factors. The aim is to equip managers with a framework that will help them find and fix gaps in project delivery system through proper planning, engaging stakeholders, and constant assessment of performance.

Keywords

Project Failure, Project Management, Delivery Gaps, Risk Management, Stakeholder Engagement, Project Performance

References

[1] Kerzner, H. (2019). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

[2] Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2017). Leadership in project management: Leading people and projects to success (2nd ed.). Routledge.

[3] Project Management Institute. (2019). Pulse of the profession 2019: Success in disruptive times. Newtown Square, PA: Author.

[4] Project Management Institute. (2016). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.

[5] Standish Group. (2019). CHAOS report 2019: Beyond infinity. The Standish Group International.

[6] Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2019). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 37(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002

[7] Flyvbjerg, B. (2016). Top ten behavioral biases in project management: An overview. Project Management Journal, 52(6), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211049046

[8] Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project management: A managerial approach (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

[9] Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2019). Does Agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 37(8), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.001

[10] Zwikael, O., & Meredith, J. (2019). Evaluating the success of projects and portfolios. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(2), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2018-0117

[11] World Bank. (2017). Projects and operations: Improving project performance. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[12] Bourne, L. (2015). Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation. Gower Publishing, Surrey.

[13] DeMarco, T. (2013). Controlling Software Projects: Management, Measurement and Estimation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

[14] Dinsmore, P.C. and Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2014). The AMA Handbook of Project Management. 4th ed. American Management Association, New York.

[15] Drucker, P.F. (2007). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Routledge, New York.

[16] Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston.

[17] Hillson, D. (2017). Practical Project Risk Management: The ATOM Methodology. 3rd ed. Management Concepts Press, Virginia.

[18] Phillips, J. (2016). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.

[19] Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 6th ed. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania.

[20] Schwalbe, K. (2016). Information Technology Project Management. 10th ed. Cengage Learning, Boston.

[21] Sommerville, I. (2016). Software Engineering. 10th ed. Pearson Education, London.

[22] Wiegers, K. and Beatty, J. (2013). Software Requirements. 3rd ed. Microsoft Press, Washington.

How to cite this paper

Onyinyechi Isima "Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 11 2019 Page 691-702 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316
Onyinyechi Isima "Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 11, May. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316
Onyinyechi Isima (2019). Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(11). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316
Onyinyechi Isima "Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 11, May. 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316
@article{1718316,
      author = {Onyinyechi Isima},
      title = {Why Projects Fail: A Framework for Identifying Critical Gaps in Project Delivery},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {11},
      pages = {691-702},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718316.pdf},
      abstract = {Project failure is a recurring problem all over the world. Both developed and developing countries are at risk of it. Even though there have been improvements in the ways of managing projects and the tools used to do so; many projects still do not meet the expected goals almost in terms of cost, time, scope, and quality. This paper focuses on the main reasons behind the failure of projects and constructs a theory for figuring out the most critical missing elements in project execution. Using a quantitative method, the study surveyed project management professionals to identify critical gaps in project delivery, relating from different industries to project management failures. Results show that factors such as communication failure, mis-estimation of project goals, neglecting risk management procedures, and lack of proper funding to name a few are the most frequent reasons of project failure. Besides, project outcomes are also highly dependent on organizational culture, governance structures, and external environmental factors. The aim is to equip managers with a framework that will help them find and fix gaps in project delivery system through proper planning, engaging stakeholders, and constant assessment of performance.},
      keywords = {Project Failure, Project Management, Delivery Gaps, Risk Management, Stakeholder Engagement, Project Performance},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I11-1718316}
  }