Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718346
IPO Valuation and Post-Listing Performance in India (2015–2024): An Integrated Analysis of Valuation, Demand, Sentiment, And Firm-Level Determinants
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Finance
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718346
Abstract
In this paper, the authors investigate the factors that affect the IPO listing gains and the one-year post-listing returns in India during the decade (2015-2024) that marks a period of major structural change in the primary equity market in India. The study uses a cross-sectional ordinary least squares (OLS) analysis, which is complemented by heteroscedasticity-robust inference along with binary logistic regression analysis, to analyse a sample of 230 mainboard IPOs from a universe of 354 IPOs that made it to the National Stock Exchange (NSE) or the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). Two outcomes are analyzed: listing gain (short run underpricing) and 1-year return (medium run performance). Explanatory variables include valuation (issue P/E ratio), demand (total subscription multiple), pre-listing sentiment (grey market premium, GMP), corporate governance (post-issue holding of promoters), macro-financial conditions (India VIX on listing date) and issuer scale (natural log of issue size). The listing-gain regression (R² = 0.58) confirms that the subscription rate (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and GMP (β = 0.37, p < 0.001) are the two most important factors, which aligns with information cascade and investor sentiment theories. The constraints of valuation discipline and macro-financial stability, in the form of issue P/E ratio (β = −0.11, p < 0.05) and India VIX (β = −0.29, p < 0.05) are significantly negatively related to short-run underpricing. The holding of the promoter (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) and the volume of the issue (β = 0.24, p < 0.01) are the main factors over one-year periods (R² = 0.49), and sentiment variables are greatly reduced, suggesting a structural shift from the demand-driven to the fundamentals-driven pricing of this type of issue over the medium term. The logistic model correctly forecasts positive one-year returns 71.3% of the time based on the pre-listing observables alone. The results of the sectoral analysis indicate that the technology sector and the consumer-sector IPOs had materially higher returns compared to traditional industries while the return dispersion of issues revealed COVId-19 was significantly higher.
Keywords
IPO Underpricing, Post-Listing Performance, Grey Market Premium, Subscription Rate, India VIX, Investor Sentiment, Promoter Holding, Emerging Markets, OLS Regression.
References
[1] Aggarwal, R., Leal, R., & Hernandez, L. (1993). The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Latin America. Financial Management, 22(1), 42–53.
[2] Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. R. (1989). Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3 [VERIFIED – DOI confirmed]
[3] Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.129 [VERIFIED]
[4] Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3 [VERIFIED]
[5] Black, F. (1986). Noise. The Journal of Finance, 41(3), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04513.x [VERIFIED]
[6] Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[7] Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02426.x [VERIFIED]
[8] Chemmanur, T., & Fulghieri, P. (1999). A theory of the going-public decision. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.2.249 [VERIFIED]
[9] Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset (3rd ed.). Wiley.
[10] Dhar, S., & Dutta, A. (2012). IPO underpricing in India: Evidence from the Indian stock market. International Journal of Financial Management, 2(1), 1–12. [⚠ UNVERIFIED – journal title and DOI could not be confirmed via open-access databases; recommend institutional verification prior to submission]
[11] Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486 [VERIFIED]
[12] Ghosh, S. (2005). Underpricing of initial public offerings: The Indian experience. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(6), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2005.11052625 [VERIFIED – DOI added]
[13] Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1699–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04778.x [VERIFIED]
[14] Khurshed, A. (2000). The motivation behind the IPO process. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(3–4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00319 [VERIFIED]
[15] Ljungqvist, A. (2007). IPO underpricing. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (pp. 375–422). Elsevier. [VERIFIED]
[16] Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (2004). Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management, 33(3), 5–37. [VERIFIED]
[17] Mazumder, S., & Saha, P. (2021). COVID-19: Fear of pandemic and short-term IPO performance. Finance Research Letters, 43, Article 101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101977 [VERIFIED – new addition to address GMP/sentiment gap]
[18] Pandey, I. M. (2015). Financial management (11th ed.). Vikas Publishing.
[19] Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x [VERIFIED]
[20] Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1 [VERIFIED]
[21] Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[22] Sahoo, S., & Rajib, P. (2010). Aftermarket pricing performance of initial public offerings (IPOs): Indian IPO market 2002–2006. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 35(4), 27–43. [VERIFIED – page range corrected from 27–44 in original to 27–43 per journal record]
[23] SEBI. (2023). Primary market handbook. Securities and Exchange Board of India. https://www.sebi.gov.in
[24] Seth, R., & Agarwal, R. (2018). Determinants of IPO underpricing in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(2), 233–256. [⚠ UNVERIFIED – volume and page range could not be confirmed via open-access sources; institutional library access recommended]
[25] Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967 [VERIFIED]
[26] Singh, B., & Yadav, S. S. (2016). IPO pricing and performance in India. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 22(3), 45–60.
[27] BSE India. (2024). IPO statistics and listing data. https://www.bseindia.com
[28] NSE India. (2024). IPO historical data and India VIX. https://www.nseindia.com
[29] Chittorgarh. (2024). IPO database and subscription statistics. https://www.chittorgarh.com
How to cite this paper
@article{1718346,
author = {Varsha Ganesh, Prof. Manoj Kumar P. A.},
title = {IPO Valuation and Post-Listing Performance in India (2015–2024): An Integrated Analysis of Valuation, Demand, Sentiment, And Firm-Level Determinants},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {5089-5101},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718346.pdf},
abstract = {In this paper, the authors investigate the factors that affect the IPO listing gains and the one-year post-listing returns in India during the decade (2015-2024) that marks a period of major structural change in the primary equity market in India. The study uses a cross-sectional ordinary least squares (OLS) analysis, which is complemented by heteroscedasticity-robust inference along with binary logistic regression analysis, to analyse a sample of 230 mainboard IPOs from a universe of 354 IPOs that made it to the National Stock Exchange (NSE) or the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). Two outcomes are analyzed: listing gain (short run underpricing) and 1-year return (medium run performance). Explanatory variables include valuation (issue P/E ratio), demand (total subscription multiple), pre-listing sentiment (grey market premium, GMP), corporate governance (post-issue holding of promoters), macro-financial conditions (India VIX on listing date) and issuer scale (natural log of issue size). The listing-gain regression (R² = 0.58) confirms that the subscription rate (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and GMP (β = 0.37, p < 0.001) are the two most important factors, which aligns with information cascade and investor sentiment theories. The constraints of valuation discipline and macro-financial stability, in the form of issue P/E ratio (β = −0.11, p < 0.05) and India VIX (β = −0.29, p < 0.05) are significantly negatively related to short-run underpricing. The holding of the promoter (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) and the volume of the issue (β = 0.24, p < 0.01) are the main factors over one-year periods (R² = 0.49), and sentiment variables are greatly reduced, suggesting a structural shift from the demand-driven to the fundamentals-driven pricing of this type of issue over the medium term. The logistic model correctly forecasts positive one-year returns 71.3% of the time based on the pre-listing observables alone. The results of the sectoral analysis indicate that the technology sector and the consumer-sector IPOs had materially higher returns compared to traditional industries while the return dispersion of issues revealed COVId-19 was significantly higher.},
keywords = {IPO Underpricing, Post-Listing Performance, Grey Market Premium, Subscription Rate, India VIX, Investor Sentiment, Promoter Holding, Emerging Markets, OLS Regression.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718346}
}