International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718773

1718773 Vol 9 · Issue 12 Download Paper

Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar

Debolina Kar Farooq Ahmed Shariff

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Film Studies

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773

Abstract

This thesis examines the relationship between visual spectacle and narrative engagement in the films of Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar, two of the most influential figures in contemporary mainstream Hindi cinema. The central argument is that spectacle in Hindi popular cinema should not be treated merely as ornamentation or excess; rather, it frequently performs crucial narrative, emotional, and ideological functions. Through a comparative qualitative textual analysis, the study investigates how mise-en-scene, colour design, architecture, costume, choreography, music, lighting, and spatial composition participate in the construction of meaning and audience engagement. The selected corpus includes Devdas (2002), Bajirao Mastani (2015), and Padmaavat (2018) from Bhansali, and Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham (2001), Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003), and My Name Is Khan (2010) from the Johar/Dharma authorial universe. The analysis finds that Bhansali transforms spectacle into an operatic language of emotional externalisation, while Johar mobilises spectacle through polish, glamour, aspirational settings, and emotionally direct musical sequences. The thesis concludes that both filmmakers represent two distinct but interrelated modes the baroque-operatic and the glossy-melodramatic, both of which challenge the simplistic binary of 'style versus substance' by demonstrating that style itself produces narrative meaning, emotional alignment, and cultural imagination.

Keywords

Visual Spectacle, Narrative Engagement, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, Karan Johar, Melodrama, Auteur Theory, Visual Semiotics, Mise-En-Scene, Bollywood.

References

[1] Brooks, Peter (1976). The Melodramatic Imagination. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300065534/the-melodramatic-imagination/

[2] Vasudevan, Ravi (1989). "The Melodramatic Mode and the Commercial Hindi Cinema." Screen, 30(3), 29–50. https://academic.oup.com/screen/article-abstract/30/3/29/1632310

[3] Vasudevan, Ravi (2010). The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-230-11812-6

[4] Gopalan, Lalitha (2002). Cinema of Interruptions: Action Genres in Contemporary Indian Cinema. British Film Institute. https://www.amazon.com/Cinema-Interruptions-Action-Genres-Contemporary/dp/0851709222

[5] Mishra, Vijay (2002). Bollywood Cinema: Temples of Desire. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Bollywood-Cinema-Temples-of-Desire/Mishra/p/book/9780415930154

[6] Prasad, M. Madhava (1998). Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ideology-of-the-hindi-film-9780195652956

[7] Thomas, Rosie (1985). "Indian Cinema: Pleasures and Popularity." Screen, 26(3–4), 116–131. https://academic.oup.com/screen/article-abstract/26/3-4/116/1931095

[8] Gunning, Tom (1986). "The Cinema of Attractions." Wide Angle, 8(3–4), 63–70. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1966773

[9] Ganti, Tejaswini (2004, revised 2013). Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Bollywood-A-Guidebook-to-Popular-Hindi-Cinema/Ganti/p/book /9780415583886

[10] Dwyer, Rachel, and Patel, Divia (2002). Cinema India: The Visual Culture of Hindi Film. Reaktion Books. https://reaktionbooks.co.uk/work/cinema-india

[11] Dwyer, Rachel (2006). Filming the Gods: Religion and Indian Cinema. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Filming-the-Gods-Religion-and-Indian-Cinema/Dwyer/p/book/97 80415314251

[12] Dwyer, Rachel (2014). Bollywood's India: Hindi Cinema as a Guide to Contemporary India. Reaktion Books. https://reaktionbooks.co.uk/work/bollywoods-india

[13] Gopal, Sangita, and Moorti, Sujata, eds. (2008). Global Bollywood: Travels of Hindi Song and Dance. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/global-bollywood

[14] Morcom, Anna (2007). Hindi Film Songs and the Cinema. Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315092980/hindi-film-songs-cinem a-anna-morcom

[15] Dudrah, Rajinder Kumar (2006). Bollywood: Sociology Goes to the Movies. Sage Publications. https://archive.org/details/bollywoodsociolo0000dudr

[16] Mishra, Vijay (2007). The Literature of the Indian Diaspora: Diasporic Imaginations. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Literature-of-the-Indian-Diaspora-Diasporic-Imaginations/Mishra/p/book/978041577123

[17] Rajadhyaksha, Ashish, and Willemen, Paul, eds. (1999). Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema. British Film Institute / Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopaedia-Indian-Cinema-Ashish-Rajadhyaksha/dp/0851706696

[18] Gokulsing, K. Moti, and Dissanayake, Wimal (1998). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. https://www.worldcat.org/title/indian-popular-cinema-a-narrative-of-cultural-change/oclc/37903534

[19] Kabir, Nasreen Munni (2001). Bollywood: The Indian Cinema Story. Channel 4 Books. https://www.amazon.com/Bollywood-Indian-Cinema-Nasreen-Munni/dp/0752261460

[20] Virdi, Jyotika (2003). The Cinematic ImagiNation: Indian Popular Films as Social History. Rutgers University Press. https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/the-cinematic-imagination/9780813531908

[21] Chakravarty, Sumita (1993). National Identity in Indian Popular Cinema, 1947–1987. University of Texas Press. https://utpress.utexas.edu/9780292711853/

[22] Dissanayake, Wimal, ed. (1993). Melodrama and Asian Cinema. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/melodrama-and-asian-cinema/A3B6F7D5D5C18A0B4A23F7E1F9C0D8B2

[23] Booth, Gregory D. (2008). Behind the Curtain: Making Music in Mumbai's Film Studios. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/behind-the-curtain-9780195327489

[24] Pendakur, Manjunath (2003). Indian Popular Cinema: Industry, Ideology and Consciousness. Hampton Press. https://www.worldcat.org/title/indian-popular-cinema-industry-ideology-and-consciousness/oclc/51553522

[25] Desai, Jigna (2004). Beyond Bollywood: The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Beyond-Bollywood-The-Cultural-Politics-of-South-Asian-Diasporic-Film/Desai/p/book/9780415969253

[26] Joshi, Lalit Mohan, ed. (2002). Bollywood: Popular Indian Cinema. Dakini Books. https://www.worldcat.org/title/bollywood-popular-indian-cinema/oclc/52046968

[27] Srinivas, S.V . (2009). Megastar: Chiranjeevi and Telugu Cinema after N.T. Rama Rao. Oxford University Press.https://global.oup.com/academic/product/megastar-9780198062011

[28] Gopal, Sangita (2011). Conjugations: Marriage and Form in New Bollywood Cinema. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/bo ok/chicago/C/bo10877244.html

[29] Mehta, Rini Bhattacharya, and Pandharipande, Rajeshwari, eds. (2010). Bollywood andGlobalization: Indian Popular Cinema, Nation, and Diaspora. Anthem Press. https://www.anthempress.com/bollywood-and-globalization-hb

[30] Samanta, T., and Rawat, R. K. (2026). "The Politics of Color in Historical Films: Cultural Dualities in Padmaavat and Bajirao Mastani." ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i2s.2026.7054

How to cite this paper

Debolina Kar, Farooq Ahmed Shariff "Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 12 2026 Page 899-907 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773
Debolina Kar, Farooq Ahmed Shariff "Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 12, Jun. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773
Debolina Kar, Farooq Ahmed Shariff (2026). Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773
Debolina Kar, Farooq Ahmed Shariff "Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 12, Jun. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773
@article{1718773,
      author = {Debolina Kar, Farooq Ahmed Shariff},
      title = {Visual Spectacle Vs Narrative Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {899-907},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718773.pdf},
      abstract = {This thesis examines the relationship between visual spectacle and narrative engagement in the films of Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Karan Johar, two of the most influential figures in contemporary mainstream Hindi cinema. The central argument is that spectacle in Hindi popular cinema should not be treated merely as ornamentation or excess; rather, it frequently performs crucial narrative, emotional, and ideological functions. Through a comparative qualitative textual analysis, the study investigates how mise-en-scene, colour design, architecture, costume, choreography, music, lighting, and spatial composition participate in the construction of meaning and audience engagement. The selected corpus includes Devdas (2002), Bajirao Mastani (2015), and Padmaavat (2018) from Bhansali, and Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham (2001), Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003), and My Name Is Khan (2010) from the Johar/Dharma authorial universe. The analysis finds that Bhansali transforms spectacle into an operatic language of emotional externalisation, while Johar mobilises spectacle through polish, glamour, aspirational settings, and emotionally direct musical sequences. The thesis concludes that both filmmakers represent two distinct but interrelated modes the baroque-operatic and the glossy-melodramatic, both of which challenge the simplistic binary of 'style versus substance' by demonstrating that style itself produces narrative meaning, emotional alignment, and cultural imagination.},
      keywords = {Visual Spectacle, Narrative Engagement, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, Karan Johar, Melodrama, Auteur Theory, Visual Semiotics, Mise-En-Scene, Bollywood.},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718773}
  }