Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718874
Robust PID Antenna Position Control System with Disturbance Mitigation Using Differential Evolution Algorithm Variants
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Control Engineering
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1718874
Abstract
This paper presents a robust and efficient way of tuning PID controller using different variants of differential evolution (DE) algorithms for control of antenna positioning system and external disturbance mitigation. Quite a number of failure in complex control systems e.g. flights is attributed to external disturbance resulting from natural events, and sometimes from man oriented events. Hence controllers should not only be rated based on their ability to track the command input (target), but also in their ability to mitigate the effects of external disturbance. Five DE variants were implemented in this experiment, out of which DE/rand/2/JDE/bin appear to be optimal in addressing the problem, with maximum disturbance amplitude of 0.00073 which decayed rapidly to zero within 3 seconds, peak overshot of 0.0167, rise time of 0.04sec, and settling time of 0.08sec. This has an overall cost or objective fitness function of 0.034. The second optimal optimizer is DE/rand/1/bin with maximum disturbance amplitude of 0.00079.
Keywords
Differential Evolution Algorithms, PID Controller, Step Response, Ziegler–Nichols Tuning Method, Optimization, Objective Fitness Function.
References
[1] A.R. Laware1, V.S. Banda and D.B. Talange. Real Time Temperature Control System Using PID Controller and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA),International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2013
[2] I J Narath and M. Gopal: Control system Engineering, fourth Edition, 2006
[3] J. Brest, S. Greiner, B. Boškovic, M. Mernik, and V. Žumer. Self-Adapting ControlParameters in Differential Evolution: A Comparative Study on Numerical Benchmark Problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10(6):646–657, 2006.
[4] Katsuhiko Ogata Modern Control Engineering Fifth Edition Upper Saddle River 3010
[5] K Smriti Rao, Ravi Mishra Comparative study of P, PI and PID controller for speed control of VSI-fed induction moto, International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2014
[6] S. Iliya. Application of Computational Intelligence in Cognitive Radio Network for Efficient Spectrum Utilization, and Speech Therapy. PhD Thesis, 2017.
[7] S. Iliya, F. Neri, D. Menzies, P. Cornelius, and L. Picinali. Differential evolution schemes for speech segmentation: A comparative study. In IEEE Symposia Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), 2014.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718874,
author = {Sunday Iliya , Olurotimi Olakunle Awodiji, Geraldine Rangmoen Rimven},
title = {Robust PID Antenna Position Control System with Disturbance Mitigation Using Differential Evolution Algorithm Variants},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {4970-4976},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718874.pdf},
abstract = {This paper presents a robust and efficient way of tuning PID controller using different variants of differential evolution (DE) algorithms for control of antenna positioning system and external disturbance mitigation. Quite a number of failure in complex control systems e.g. flights is attributed to external disturbance resulting from natural events, and sometimes from man oriented events. Hence controllers should not only be rated based on their ability to track the command input (target), but also in their ability to mitigate the effects of external disturbance. Five DE variants were implemented in this experiment, out of which DE/rand/2/JDE/bin appear to be optimal in addressing the problem, with maximum disturbance amplitude of 0.00073 which decayed rapidly to zero within 3 seconds, peak overshot of 0.0167, rise time of 0.04sec, and settling time of 0.08sec. This has an overall cost or objective fitness function of 0.034. The second optimal optimizer is DE/rand/1/bin with maximum disturbance amplitude of 0.00079.},
keywords = {Differential Evolution Algorithms, PID Controller, Step Response, Ziegler–Nichols Tuning Method, Optimization, Objective Fitness Function.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1718874}
}