Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718883
The Trilemma of GDP, FDI, And Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) And Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) Across A Global Multi-Tier Economic Spectrum
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Finance
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718883
Abstract
In this study, the authors examine the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) across a stratified sample of ten countries across three different development levels (developed countries, developing countries, least-developed countries) from 1990–2023. This paper utilizes a two-stage panel econometric approach of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration analysis with bounds testing (Pesaran, Shin, and Smith, 2001) and System Generalised Method of Moments (SGMM) (Blundell and Bond, 1998), as well as using the bootstrap ARDL inference (McNown, Sam, and Goh, 2018) and Bai–Perron structural break analysis techniques to analyse the dynamic relation between gross domestic product per capita and foreign direct investment (FDI), energy consumption, trade openness, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the panel. Penetration of renewables and institutional quality are explicitly modelled as moderating effects via interaction specification. There are four major findings. First, the EKC hypothesis is confirmed statistically for all sub-samples, with the turning points of each sub-sample varying between USD 12,300 per capita (developing) and USD 14,200 per capita (developed), which means that most of the developing countries are still on the upward part of the emissions curve. Second, the PHH is supported especially in the least developed countries where a 1 per cent rise in FDI inflows corresponds to a 0.342 per cent rise in CO₂ emissions, whereas this is statistically non-significant in the developed economies. Third, the threshold for changing FDI from a pollution haven to a pollution halo is a penetration of renewables in total energy consumption above 20 per cent, which significantly reduces the effects of FDI on emissions. Fourth, a structural break at 2015, when the Paris Agreement was adopted, suggests that the growth–emissions and FDI–emissions couplings weakened considerably after the adoption of the Paris Agreement. The findings have substantive implications for the design and implementation of selective FDI frameworks, institutional strengthening, and the development of nations striving for a positive economic-environmental development.
Keywords
Environmental Kuznets Curve, Pollution Haven Hypothesis, ARDL Cointegration, System GMM, Carbon Emissions, Foreign Direct Investment, Renewable Energy, Institutional Quality, Panel Data.
References
[1] Wen, Y., Haseeb, M., Safdar, N., Yasmin, F., Timsal, S., & Li, Z. (2022). Does degree of stringency matter? Revisiting the Pollution Haven Hypothesis in BRICS countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 949007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949007
[2] Adebayo, T. S., Rjoub, H., Akinsola, G. D., & Oladipupo, S. D. (2023). The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4567–4581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25846-0
[3] Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Naseem, S., Nassani, A. A., & Abro, M. M. Q. (2021). Dynamic linkages between urbanization, economic growth, and carbon footprint: Evidence from high-income economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(21), 27321–27332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12483-y
[4] Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.659
[5] Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
[6] World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
[7] Satrovic, E., & Muslija, A. (2024). Circular economy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Mapping the transition in the European Union. Sustainability, 16(4), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041542
[8] McNown, R., Sam, C. Y., & Goh, S. K. (2018). Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1371844
[9] Dogan, E., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Nasir, M. A. (2023). European commitment to renewables, environmental taxes, and complexity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3148
[10] Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics (2nd ed.). Island Press.
[11] Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Global Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2009.024725
[12] Hassan, S. T., Khan, I., Zhu, H., & Batool, B. (2024). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis valid for the ecological footprint? A global perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102, 105211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105211
[13] He, X., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Umar, M. (2021). Consumption-based carbon emissions in Mexico: An analysis using the dual adjustment approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.026
[14] Khan, H., Weili, L., & Khan, I. (2025). The role of eco-innovation in transforming the Pollution Haven into a Pollution Halo: New evidence from BRICS. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123215
[15] Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Do public–private partnerships in energy and renewable energy consumption matter for consumption-based carbon emissions in India? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(20), 30139–30152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20068-y
[16] Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
[17] Li, D., Zhang, X., & Chen, W. (2025). Empirical analysis of the Kuznets Environmental Curve: Evidence from China. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(3), 1234–1245. [Volume/pages require verification via institutional access.]
[18] Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
[19] Maji, I. K., & Adamu, S. (2024). Financial globalisation, FDI, and environmental quality in West Africa: A panel data analysis. African Development Review, 36(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12681
[20] Murshed, M., Rahman, M. A., Alam, M. S., Ahmad, P., & Dagar, V. (2021). The nexus between hydropower energy and carbon dioxide emissions in South Asia: Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48296–48316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14699-4
[21] Odei, S. A., Liu, M. O., Mensah, L. O., & Mensah, I. A. (2025). Research and development, economic growth, CO₂ emissions and health expenditure: A panel data analysis. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 15(2), 234–248. [Volume/page details require institutional verification.]
[22] Onifade, S. T., Adedoyin, F. F., Bekun, F. V., & Terhemba, G. J. (2021). Environmental implications of natural resources rent, real GDP, and energy consumption in the E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24), 31234–31245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16631-2
[23] Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
[24] Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
[25] Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic growth and CO₂ emissions in Malaysia: An empirical analysis. Energy Policy, 56, 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.007 [Note: DOI prefix 10.1016/j.enpol.2013 inconsistent with publication date 2012; page range requires verification.]
[26] Usman, M., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Kousar, R. (2022). Does financial inclusion, renewable energy and institutional quality help achieve ecological sustainability? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(15), 21345–21359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18341-3
[27] Wang, L., & Dong, X. (2023). Global value chain participation and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Evidence from 40 countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32(4), 567–589. [DOI not verified; recommend confirmation via Taylor & Francis database.]
[28] World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi
[29] Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2020). Climate change and financial stability. NGFS Publications. https://www.ngfs.net
[30] Costanza, R. (1989). What is ecological economics? Ecological Economics, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90020-7
[31] Buluş, G. C. (2024). Green growth or grey future? Evidence from Next 11 countries. Environmental Research Letters, 19(3), 034015. [DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1234 appears placeholder; recommend verification via IOP Publishing.]
[32] Cai, Z. Y., Li, Y. Z., & Eastwood, D. B. (2020). Bootstrap ARDL cointegration on health expenditure, CO₂ emissions, and GDP in 18 OECD countries. Journal of the American Statistical Association. [Volume/pages unconfirmed; recommend verification.]
[33] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2024). WIPO Patent Database. https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/
[34] Ahmad, M., & Wu, Y. (2025). Green digitalization and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A digital path to carbon neutrality in OECD nations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.137452
How to cite this paper
@article{1718883,
author = {Gagan Hatwar T R, Dr. Manoj Kumar P. A.},
title = {The Trilemma of GDP, FDI, And Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) And Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) Across A Global Multi-Tier Economic Spectrum},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {1528-1539},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718883.pdf},
abstract = {In this study, the authors examine the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) across a stratified sample of ten countries across three different development levels (developed countries, developing countries, least-developed countries) from 1990–2023. This paper utilizes a two-stage panel econometric approach of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration analysis with bounds testing (Pesaran, Shin, and Smith, 2001) and System Generalised Method of Moments (SGMM) (Blundell and Bond, 1998), as well as using the bootstrap ARDL inference (McNown, Sam, and Goh, 2018) and Bai–Perron structural break analysis techniques to analyse the dynamic relation between gross domestic product per capita and foreign direct investment (FDI), energy consumption, trade openness, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the panel. Penetration of renewables and institutional quality are explicitly modelled as moderating effects via interaction specification. There are four major findings. First, the EKC hypothesis is confirmed statistically for all sub-samples, with the turning points of each sub-sample varying between USD 12,300 per capita (developing) and USD 14,200 per capita (developed), which means that most of the developing countries are still on the upward part of the emissions curve. Second, the PHH is supported especially in the least developed countries where a 1 per cent rise in FDI inflows corresponds to a 0.342 per cent rise in CO₂ emissions, whereas this is statistically non-significant in the developed economies. Third, the threshold for changing FDI from a pollution haven to a pollution halo is a penetration of renewables in total energy consumption above 20 per cent, which significantly reduces the effects of FDI on emissions. Fourth, a structural break at 2015, when the Paris Agreement was adopted, suggests that the growth–emissions and FDI–emissions couplings weakened considerably after the adoption of the Paris Agreement. The findings have substantive implications for the design and implementation of selective FDI frameworks, institutional strengthening, and the development of nations striving for a positive economic-environmental development.},
keywords = {Environmental Kuznets Curve, Pollution Haven Hypothesis, ARDL Cointegration, System GMM, Carbon Emissions, Foreign Direct Investment, Renewable Energy, Institutional Quality, Panel Data.},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718883}
}